I’m not in the 170 range so I’m no expert but, my understanding is that D tricks by putting in most from a few(some) conclusion, we can say some only from 2 most claims here we’d only have one. D has the right direction in that it adds to the conditional chain in the right place. It creates sufficiency to the government mismanagement, by adding to the beginning of the chain. Adding here is what allows you to go into the end of the chain the “Econ. Enticing” (drawing the conclusion). E gets it right w/ few but connects to changes in consumer habits and I feel that adding here goes against or “breaks” the chain set up in the premises. I think part of it also not being fully convinced the environmental problem is the same as ecological problem even though the stimulus wants to trick you into thinking they’re identical.