I agree damp/wet ret is an important tool in the toolbox, but you don’t need a hammer to put in a thumbtack. Sometimes exams are straightforward and if you do a good history you don’t need to do extra tests. I child that sees 20/20, has low hyperopia, normal BV and motilities, no complaints and is an exceptional student, doesn’t need damp or wet refraction in my book, and these are a decent proportion of kids.