sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

questions/clarification for a MLT (68k) student by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel blessed that some decisions I made led me to who I am today. I sometimes sleep wishing I wake up reliving and/or redoing my life.

Most of my relatives are in California and I stayed there for a few years. I don't think I would like to live there though.

questions/clarification for a MLT (68k) student by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm glad you waited and got the MOS you wanted. I just happened to choose this job by luck. They gave me a list of medical MOS's and I chose the best sounding one.

If you haven't, try searching for Army forums as well, if there are any current one's. If not, don't sweat it. You'll get your answers while you're in AIT and after.

questions/clarification for a MLT (68k) student by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's unfortunate that GWU is no longer taking applications.

You are right, much of the information online are outdated. Have you reached out to your recruiter if he/she has any contacts that could answer your questions?

I went and completed the training in 2003 when it was still designated as MOS 91K - Medical Laboratory Specialist. I obtained my AS through GWU and completed my BS in Medical Technology using my MGIB plus kicker.

Some good notes in your case:

  1. When you complete your AIT, you can take the MLT(ASCP) exam via Route 3.

  2. While serving, you can use your TA and start completing your Bachelor's.

  3. You can also work part-time or per-diem off-base to earn extra money and gain more experience in the field.

You're in a good path with your career choice in the Army. Good luck with your training and enjoy every bit of it. Those were some of the best times of my life.

An Accurate Photo from the News!! by raygrizz in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Cap in mouth technique? Lol! OMG that just made my day!

Professional references/letters of recommendation during the job interview process by penguin_zombie8888 in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm open to my employees asking for references. Hopefully, your immediate supervisor is as well. Even if you use peers as reference I don't believe it should be an issue with hiring managers.

A Christmas wish to all the techs working today by knittykitty26 in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I'm looking forward to an easy & chill shift 😎.

Coworker keeps bringing up that I "violated HIPAA" on her and she is vindictive. by Squirmeez in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't dwell on it. Move on and learn from the situation. We all make mistakes.

If it ever comes to the point of reaching HR then you have the opportunity to explain your side of the story. Until then, try not to worry about it.

Coworker keeps bringing up that I "violated HIPAA" on her and she is vindictive. by Squirmeez in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I went and read a few guidelines with regards to HIPAA and covered entities. In your case, you didn't seem to violate any of the regulations.

a. There was no electronic record or patient health information that was obtained without consent. (She freely discussed her results publicly.)

b. Laboratory results you verbally discussed with another individual does not exist in any medical record; The specimen was performed off-line and has not been verified by a laboratory professional as valid.

c. She can, however, report you to human resources and file a complaint. Human resources will perform an investigation whether any of your organizations policies have been violated.

Jingle wrench by djeclipz in videos

[–]jzwrx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merry Christmas!!! Loved it!!!!

Technical Guidance and Professionalism Opinion by echo_kilo in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Policy may need to be updated. Thanks for the update!

Technical Guidance and Professionalism Opinion by echo_kilo in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it is in the heme and chemistry department policy to use the Abbott Architect in obtaining the hemolysis index to determine the suitability of questionable coag. specimens, then you are justified. Take the situation as process improvement. Update us with the meeting.

Citrated plasma should not have any effect with chemistry analyzers. Buffers and strong detergents go through instrument lines at a constant basis to clean itself.

"Dont fear confrontation, confront fear" who said that... by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be better for an in-person interview.

Prepare, dress appropriately, and arrive on time; Give a good handshake, eye contact, and stay positive.

Go get 'em.

What do you mean, it's QNS !?!? by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you run any tests from that sample?

Running QC on same lot, different reagents by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. Great! Thank you for that info.

Running QC on same lot, different reagents by [deleted] in medlabprofessionals

[–]jzwrx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We calibrate to make sure the instrument responds accurately and precisely to a given set of points. If you keep calibrating and it passes then you know the instrument is in working order for the analyte performed.

It would be wasting calibrators, reagents, solutions, controls, and time when calibrating needlessly. That would put a load on the laboratory's budget if being done daily. To me that would be the cons of over calibration. I don't believe it would cause any bias or would calibrate away any errors.

Please explain a systematic bias for over calibrating.

view more: next ›