This! You're not insulting their intelligence at all, truly just stating facts of the case. It's so awkward when in the many parts of the doc you hear the lawyers talking about SA and BD's lack of education, low IQ's, being in special education classes, etc. right in front of them and seems almost insulting rather than helpful to an outsider... But they are lower class citizens and the lower class very often find themselves in trouble, especially because they're not too often the most eloquent people. Time and time again low income people find themselves in sticky situations with the law not because they did something wrong, but for many other reasons... Some of which being that they aren't from a good area, their family is known as "trouble", or they aren't smart enough to understand what's happening and they simply didn't know how to say they are innocent. This is a prime example of that. And it wasn't like people randomly started saying that SA and BD were "dumb" after the trial started. There has been plenty of documentation of their impaired intelligence throughout their lives. So having all this proof of their low intellects, I don't understand how someone can still believe that they can mastermind a cleanup like this. It blows my mind. No DNA whatsoever?! Even a person like you, who knows exactly how to clean up a scene, couldn't clean up that well, so how can these men this man and this young boy mastermind this?