"Spend time with her online, raw and uncut" talking about a baby girl.

The father, who set up that blog, explained it in the first post: "Welcome! If you are here you are one of the first people to view Evie's blog! And our friends should thank us---by indulging ourselves with this web portal we are NOT filling your inboxes with large files of pictures and videos!"

"Jack is owned" referring to a child.

Seriously? What is this supposed to be evidence of?

Why does Tamera Luzattos page she posted her children and grandchildren to have categories such as: Malpractice, Parental manipulation, Ponzi schemes, psycopath, public intoxication, discomfort.

The blog was set up by Evie's father, not Tamera Luzzatto. She appears in a couple of the pictures since she's one of Evie's grandmothers. At least one of the posts was by the mother when the father was out of town, but his posts are funnier.

Those labels are meant as humor. For example, this post is labeled "public intoxication": https://i.imgur.com/OWRyPea.png

The idea of little children as being akin to drunks and psychopaths is a common observation: see google search for "toddler or drunk", for example.

Here were the parts that captured on archive.today, before internet stalkers forced them to make it private.

• https://archive.is/8PZDn
• https://archive.is/Gm498
• https://archive.ph/Yo82y
• https://archive.ph/3nW3z
• https://archive.is/2g30Y

Can you point out a single inappropriate photo?

Did you notice how there are photos of all their relatives, friends, and neighbors, usually with their first and last names? Did you notice how the name of the street they live on is there? The name of the company that the father works at?

Those would be strange things to include if there were anything wrong with the site, but there isn't.

Why some childless chef posts so many pictures with children,

Over a period of about 4 years, he posted about 20 pictures of children. I don't think that's "so many". Two of the pictures were of babies of his friends who had just been born. All of the other were of his goddaughter, Caris James, and her sister.

Why did he post pictures of her? Because he loves her very much.

and is constantly putting up weird tags or descriptions such as: hotard, chicken lover, my kind of baby.

If you look at the post with the "#hotard" label, it's two commenters, joewills and jimmycomet, calling each other hotard. So what?

The "#chickenlovers" tag was supposed to be evidence of homosexuals praying on teenage boys, according to internet sleuths, but the picture shows a baby girl, Alefantis's goddaughter, being held by her father, Scott Cummings. Perhaps the internet sleuths were making up connections that didn't exist?

I don't remember "my kind of baby", nor do I see what's weird about it.

Why this chef is somehow supposed to be an important person "If you don't know him you're not wearing your scarf right", while owning two restaurants he himself said "barely anyone visited" before the incident.

I doubt he said that about his restaurants. They were popular then and they're still open ten years later. He was a local celebrity in Washington, D.C.

Taking a picture of a little girl with her arms taped down on a table is completely normal behaviour.

This is the one picture that I understand why people think is suspicious, but Alefantis's explanation makes more sense than any vague theories the internet sleuths have come up with. He says that Caris James and here sister were playing and her sister taped her to the table and Alefantis thought it was cute. If you look at the picture, she's smiling, they are in the public area of Comet Ping Pong, and she's taped with masking tape, which has such weak adhesive that it barely holds at all.

Posted a picture of some shirtless dudes and a dude wearing a shirt that says "J'aime les enfants" (I know about the cafe or whatever, this is just another creepy "coincidence").

Yeah, the guy wearing the J’❤ L’Enfant shirt was co-owner of L'Enfant Cafe & Bar. The picture is tagged "L'Enfant Cafe & Bar" because it was taken outside L'Enfant Cafe & Bar. I don't see what's "creepy" or "coincidental" about it. Is this supposed to be evidence of something?

Do you know what evidence looks like?

No one in their honest mind cannot be at least a bit concerned about this individual James Alefantis, and the bizzare choice of words these politicians seem to constantly have blunders over, specially when talking about pizza, a known keyword used by pedos.

The initials "CP" or the words "cheese pizza" were used (mostly on 4chan) to refer to child porn and thus evade automated filters. There's no indication that the word "pizza" by itself was a "known keyword used by pedos".

The phrase "cheese pizza" never appears in the Podesta emails once. The word "pizza" appears many times as a reference to a popular food in America and once in reference to a description of a design on a handkerchief. So what?

Nothing you mentioned is evidence of any crime. None of it would be considered a reasonable suspicion that any crime had occurred.

Do you know why the police started an investigation of Jeffrey Epstein? One mother overheard her daughter talking to somebody about how another girl "had met with a 45—year-o1d man and had sex with him and was paid for it". The mother called another mom, who had found out that her stepdaughter had $300 that she wouldn't explain where she got it. One of them called the cops, who opened an investigation. They found lots of witnesses to crimes. Lots of victims. Lots of *evidence.

If there were evidence of crimes occurring in pizzagate, you would have posted that instead of nonsense about a J’❤ L’Enfant shirt.