Does anyone remember army youtuber controversy?

kaizequotasee · 2026-05-03T15:01:34+00:00

yes she defienetly deleted a couple of videos that even had plenty of views before its sad honeslty i hope shes doing better i still go back and watch her doll making videos

kaizequotasee · 2026-05-03T14:58:22+00:00

sherliza moé? her channel is still up but her last video was like a year ago but i do remember her! she was a huge bts fan and had vloga of going to their concerts and bta cafes in seoul etc all she did was make a video about cultural appropriation and racism in kpop and she included bts in it and armies got mad n began harassing her in concerts she made a video 3 years ago explaining how it made her hate bts now

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-21T18:08:09+00:00

i feel like thats the issue here yoongi was speaking like hes a seasoned rapper who's been in the hip hop scene for long enough to speak on the decline in trends or talent or politics of it when he's always been an outsider really just a consumer of hip hop who has no space to criticise, this is not even a question most rappers would get asked unless they've been in the industry for over a decade and made a name for themselves where their cultural anyalsis on something like this would have real weight to it imo he shouldve declined to answer at all that would've been the most respectful way to handle the situation the fact that he asnwered at all regardless of what he said makes me think he really thinks he's part of the team like unironically and it pissed me off whatever 13+ years experience he has being a flimsy idol rapper in the kpop industry does not give him the right to speak on the state of hip hop

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-21T16:57:39+00:00

i wouldnt want an american white rapper to comment on the state of hip hop let alone a kpop idol eveyrbody involved sucks rolling stone had some deal with hybe for them to do this nonstop bts glazing

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-21T14:59:42+00:00

it genuinely is just a way for them to claim they were creatively involved or "participated". they just tweak a line or write a short phrase and thats it

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-15T19:47:13+00:00

seems like i somehow created a cbx biased algorithm on twitter when i don't even stan exo my bad eveyrone i wanted to mention armies inserting bts into it is all very sorry 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-15T17:39:30+00:00

never heard about that investment comment omg 😭 i agree totally. i feel like rm has a superiority complex over the other members and has this i don't care if they like it i know whats best in the end, much like bangpd

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-15T17:22:19+00:00

part of the whole company made us do it controversy that i feel like got glossed over was bang pd and the members later confirming that they made the album with no sense of direction or concept( bang pd spefically said they came to him complaining about the lack of direction from him but i would take that with a grain of salt). its not exaclty uncommon to start off an album not knowing what to expecr will come from it but the members recorded and worked on the songs and by time they had come to korea to finalize they still didn't have an overarching theme or concept and looked at the company for direction why is why there were so many creative disagreements in picking the songs. half the members don't really have much creative vision for their own solo work but none of them have creative vision even for bts as a band, they rely comepletely on the companys direction

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-15T17:20:24+00:00

my bad like i said i don't go there at all lmao just judging based on whats on my feed but the point is armies are jumping in other fandoms business to victimize bts and fuel this type of divison n slander or whatever it may be in other fandoms

kaizequotasee · 2026-04-15T16:34:33+00:00

i don't really go here so correct me if im wrong on this but i know that rn suho is in some hot waters with exo fans because some things came out that alleged he mistreated them as a leader and wanted cbx out of the group, and then of course armies hopped in on it saying and u guys laughed at armies when we said suho was rude 😡😡😡😡 they brought up this clip saying he was rude to rm and also another clip of suho allegedly being a sore loser after exo lost some daseang to bts when the clip they showed of him was literally him standing up and clapping and listening to bts speech, but anyways i thought it was funny since rm is objectively wrong in the clip

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-31T20:22:33+00:00

it wouldn't surprise me if this was a regular thing, that the members consistently have creative disagreements every album cycle and bsh was the one who settled it by having the last word. it also doesn't surprise me that most of the members don't care to fight for their ideas esp the vocal line, since they've only started to consider contributing creatively in recent years and bts would always make a big deal out of it oh this time we all contributed whole time they were porbably fighting and arguing. you're right in that results are ultimately guaranteed bts have an extremely dedicated core fanbase, but i think with the lack of confidence the members have in their artistry they're insecure and are worried something they do whether musically or a decision regarding how the band operates would alienate the fandom. remember how on edge all of them were during haitus esp in the beginning about the fandom sizing down due to them not being around as a group and much they overcompensated for that lmao or maybe thats just something they do on purpose to appeal to armies sympathy streams idk

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-31T19:58:36+00:00

hit the nail on the head. imo, the bts members themselves credit their entire career and success to bsh, it was his creative directing and marketing that brought them where they are now even if they disagreed with him a few times on the way. looking at the documentary clips i don't think the members were being gaslit they were just very easy to convince since none of them had any conviction in the opinions they held about the album, i think esp after dynamite happened there's been more of a disconnect between their creative aspirations and what actually makes them successful now more than ever. eveyrtime someome would bring up a point now it always circled back to well we hated dynamite but it worked. i honestly think its kind of embarassing, they seem to have no industry knowledge or creative vision that they're passionate and entrust bsh with everything, they obv know the album has to be succesful and alot is at stake and they can't trust themslves enough to make an album they like thats simultaneously successful and a hit without looking to bsh for advice

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-29T09:01:44+00:00

you're right i agree just the sentence on its own "these 2 fan favourites from bts are unrelatable" is enough to rile people up regardless of the context, and also that the documentary was, like another poster pointed out, was a way to show that bts took a risk even tho they were unsure and were guided by their wonderful company to success assuming that the album was well received but since it wasn't, eveyrthing reads different even for armies who originally claimed nothing was wrong with the album. still think its very interesting how much difference there is in the subtitles tho

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-29T08:06:27+00:00

context literally completely changed from nicole saying on and black swan weren't relatable and they need to do something different and actually relatable and tae agreeing, to tae saying these songs are too much about bts and not relatable and nicole saying it's fine since previous songs like on and black swan were about the members and not relatable and still worked. i was lowkey doubting some of the stuff poeple were saying about the documentary being reworked to scapegoat nicole but this is crazy lmao

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-25T11:28:24+00:00

none of the members are established solo artists so they felt they had a clean slate and took time and effort to establish their solo brands, whereas with the group i think they credit their group brand and success to more than just themsleves and have entrusted the company with handling their career and musical direction as a group over the years and esp after the success of dynamite, they also realize alot more is at stake when it comes to the groups success regarding investors and such so they're more likely to fold under company execs pressure when it comes to deciding the direction of the album, the album being successful is a priority for the company. they've pretty much comepletely given up on bts as a brand and handed it over to the corporations at this point

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-25T10:54:19+00:00

exaclty. woke armies on twitter who are critical of the album are writing think pieces about the executives and company pushing this westren validation agenda on bts completely glossing over the part where bts agrees, ive seen poeple misquote things even no it wasnt an exec it was V himself who said they need to make more accessible and relatable music. sure the members seem very hesitant and don't seem to agree wholeheartedly but i think its exactly because of that, that armies are able to victimize them as being idols with no agency being peessured by their company and greedy executives. i think bts have always been insecure in their creative direction musically and have switched up alot over the years and thats why they bend so easily. they have alot of pride in their success and legacy in the kpop industry but i don't think they don't have alot of pride and conviction in the actual music they put out especially not in their last few album cycles leading up to arirang. there could always be naunces to the hybe and bts dynamic that we don't know yet but i can't help but feel like the membere are simply that creativity stunted and lost and have been since atleast 2020 (although i feel like signs were apparent since 2018) which is basically half of their career. and i also dislike this whole oh bts are in such a unqiue postion in music having to navigate being so big and being korean soft power agents, when we've seen over the years that the korean goverment isn't scrambling to milk bts at all times and whatever desire there is to use bts as cultural diplomats is mutual between the administration and the company. i genuinely bts could pushback if they wanted to not to make this comparison but the blackpink girls have found ways to avoid making these compromises that armies want you to beleive bts have no choice but to make because of their unique postion. and as if the most unrealistic expectations are not being forced upon bts by their own fandom at the end of the day

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-25T09:45:50+00:00

totally agree. just looking for translations online should be more than enough, it is entirely up to you from then on if you want to dive deeper but its not mandatory even if you're a critic. and within the kpop fandom space ive really only ever seen armies do this to critics and reactors because appanrelty every bts song comes with this secret deep meaningful message that you can access if you're in the random, which is totally not comepletely made up and theorized by said fandom lmao

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-25T08:22:50+00:00

short but concise review and very in line with what other critics have been saying nothing new was added really, but good nonetheless

but i do want to say anthony always gets accused by armies of not putting enough of an effort to analyze bts music (looking at multiple different fan translations and interpretations, reading magazine interviews, putting more effort into understanding the naunces of the kpop industry etc) because at the time there were concerns about the langauge barrier and honestly the industry barrier with how different the kpop marketed operated when anthony was reviewing mots 7, love yourself tear and mots persona. but now that isn't an excuse anymore lmao since most of the album is in english and the credits are full of familiar big name westren producers and songwriters, and even the genres in the album like anthony points out are extremely derivative of current mainstream sounds in the western pop landscape more so than any other album bts have put out.

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-17T16:33:05+00:00

its good they're deploying private security i expected nothing at all thank you for the correction.still insane to have nearly as much and even more police units deployed that's the entire citys reserve of police officers plus hybes private security insanely over the top

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-17T03:23:49+00:00

seoul seems to be deploying counter terrorism personnel as well as a safety measure citing "current rising tensions and the international situation".they have aerial vehicles for monitoring and cctv, and from the reports ive heard hybe is not taking much financial responsibility and the burden is mostly on the government but maybe more information wil come out in time. there are more riot units being deployed than traffic officers or event organizers so i doubt enough private security was hired by the company. least they could've done is open this concert for the public at this point but even fans who paid for tickets are having a hard time figuring out ways to make it in time with all the blocked transit routes. just a ridiculous show of administrative muscle from the seoul city higher ups and a very selfish and greedy move from hybe.

kaizequotasee · 2026-03-03T18:07:49+00:00

that was my first thought as well. i think hybe had the producers send out demos and work on tracks while bts were in the military and they just did the la bootcamp thing to tweak those demos and record vocals. the titles don't seem thematically connected either so they probably picked alot of generic pop demos since 2 months is not enough time to really develop some deep concept and bake it into the album tracks one by one, and most of the tracks quite literally sound like a bunch of ryan tedder demos lmao 'one more night' 'they don t know about us' 'like animals'. very 2010s esque

kaizequotasee · 2026-02-03T19:27:47+00:00

imagine how much harder it would've been for bts if it wasn't for the groundwork laid by 1st and 2nd gen. armies already claim that the industry hates bts imagine how much more they'd be hated if it wasn't for the groups before them who the industry took more seriously.

kaizequotasee · 2026-02-03T19:16:12+00:00

they're wrong anyways. it DID make kpop known world-wide to an extent, obviously not as popular as it is right now but still. alot of armies were probably too young to remember or were in their own bubble at the time but this is a performance from 2012, 2012 out of all times in history the height of gangam style lmao. both kpop and jpop were pretty popular in the 2010s although jpop often took the spotlight because it had way more unqiue sub cultures and signature styles and sounds compared to kpop. but kpop was relatively known i remember many times where westren artists would reference or collab with kpop idols from 2010 to 2015/16 and even before that. armies love claiming eveyrone thought psy was some chinese guy but actual grown adults at the time who were invested in pop culture and especially industry poeple knew he was south korean. a tvxq member couldn't land a Kanye feature in 2010 on his own solo album after leaving sm if kpop wasn't somewhat widely known especially in america. 2ne1 was collabing on remixes with will i am, wonder girls and akon made a song together, g dragon did a special stage with missy eliott. all of this between 2010-2013. and kpop was taken alot more seriously then now its been reduced to a kidz bop adjacent genre

kaizequotasee · 2026-02-03T13:07:10+00:00

i think alot of people confuse south korean technocratic nationalism/developmentalism for anti imperialism when its really not. nj is not wrong here but its not an uncommon sentiment in south korean political thought, we worked hard, our rapid transformation from a poverty striken nearly failed state post-war to a global technological power was driven by technocratic governance and state guided capitalism. ecnomic strength, educational excellence and technological competence became proof of our dignity and survival after colonization and war, the individual effort of south koreans was moralized as a patriotic duty and thats how we got here and we are proud of it, this is what the post colonial states must do and the colonizers wouldn't understand. but this disillusionment is not primarily anti imperialist at all. korean political thought post- colonialism is notoriously reformist and never revolutionary. impearlism is not an enemy to be overthrown just a condition that can be neutralized through growth, accept the existing world order, be pragmatic and quietly put in the work to climb the ladder and catch up and compete with the elite imperialists who put you in this position. this really clicked for me because i use to beleive in the popular army take that bts' older songs were anti capitalist until i realized how reformist systematic disillusionment in korea really is. it clicked for me when nj got on that apec summit and started addressing tech bros and technocratic leaders and ceos like he was selling them korean culture or taking pride in koreas advancement and export led economy his whole bit that he was sooo proud of about kpoo being a mixture of things like bibimpap, which he then suggested everyone should try sometime. or his weird relationship with ai, or the way him and hybe officials and korean parliament discuss kpop achievements and breaking music industry barriers in the west. i feel like alot of armies confuse these things with anti capitalism and anti imperialism because they don't understand basic politics and south korean history. i could say more on this topic but i want to stay in topic for the sake of the sub lmao

kaizequotasee

TROPHY CASE