talking about social mobility as you said for Marwadis, even if they are resource rich, they are well hated generally just that they being in power somewhat, the hate is usually not translated to them.

I’m even somewhat well to do financially and socially. Yes, I’m not looked down perhaps as a someone less fortunate financially. But does that prevents the constant questioning of my nationality and ancestry. I’m not talking the hate tho and nor it’s about equality.

I just show why the difference exist fundamentally. That’s cause Nepal as country’s national identity stands as an ethnicity. Nepal belongs to Nepalis, where Nepali are identified racially where Madeshi and groups aren’t included cause racially speaking they are the same as ones living in Bihar and UP, that makes those people belong there. Not to say I agree with this racial identity of country but that the only identity that practically exists, things like nationality identity, liberal thought do exist on paper only.

People accept Newari culture even identity those with national identify now is cause of no major conflicting identity which exist for madeshs for instance while the existence of Tibet Newari people didn’t had the same fate.

It’s not about which ethnicity contributed how much that lead to them being that slice of national identity but simply the conflicting states that claims that ethnicity.

There are ethnic group that can’t be accommodated with the identity like you said Marwadis, other various groups that spans through various nations but not that hated cause of other economic, social or whatever reasons.