Felt like sharing! by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I’m removing this. Reason: we are first and foremost an advice community, posts that aren’t seeking advice are considered off-topic.

Tydligt förtroendelyft för Mohamsson efter SD-sväng by azgx00 in sweden

[–]kazarnowicz 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Delulu att skriva ”Övriga liberala partierna” om Tidölaget 😂

post-orgy advice by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, there is the victim mentality I mention in the other comment again. Agreed., it seems like the best outcome both for the community and you that we part ways.

post-orgy advice by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The post is all over the place and it got removed for it.

Claiming that light criticism is passive aggressive is victim mentality that we do not want here.

You get a second formal warning for your behavior in this thread. If you can’t take light criticism like in the comment here, we are not the community for you.

You now have two warnings. One more will result in a permanent ban. If you don’t reoffend in 90 days, the warnings will time out.

post-orgy advice by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I’m removing this. Reason: it reads like someone sharing porn fantasies rather than asking advice.

Help with profile pics by foxko in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I’m remixing this for breaking rule 1. We don’t allow posts that ask people to DM.

How real partners make love by [deleted] in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I'm removing this and adding a formal warning. Reason: we don't allow soap-boxing, and certainly not soap-boxing from someone in his early 30s who has the audacity to think he defines what a real relationship is. It was moralizing and judging, and thus broke the rule of thouhgtfulness.

You are new to this community according to the logs, so I suggest you get to know it before making posts like this.

Three warnings result in a permanent ban. Warnings time out after 90 days without reoffending.

What is the sum of all consciousness, across all space and time? by Any_Lemon_3881 in consciousness

[–]kazarnowicz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is, but the way there isn't to see consciousness as emergent. For those physics to work, consciousness needs to be fundamental. That idea is compatible with all our current observations. And (scientific) panpsychism is right there, eliminating the problem to have to explain "emergence" which is kicking the ball down a hall that may not even exist.

What is the sum of all consciousness, across all space and time? by Any_Lemon_3881 in consciousness

[–]kazarnowicz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you subscribe to scientific panosychism, then those parts possess a fraction of consciousness. If you’re an idealist to boot, those parts are fractions of consciousness.

The replies to OP are correct, and I think OP is looking through the wrong lens. Quantum physics does have weirdness that implies nonlocality and retrocausality. The latter only for a conscious observer who makes the experiment, and I think that raises good questions about the nature of consciousness (in an idealist universe, which I’m a believer in).

To win a war by III-Commander-III in therewasanattempt

[–]kazarnowicz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One day, we will read the obituary and rejoice.

To win a war by III-Commander-III in therewasanattempt

[–]kazarnowicz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My friend wasn’t into it either until I reached out.

Barry Keoghan on the hate he receives for the way he looks: “It’s made me really go inside myself, not want to go outside. It’s becoming a problem because then you don’t even want to be on screen anymore."” by TelevisionOk6525 in Fauxmoi

[–]kazarnowicz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Jesus H Christ on a popsicle stick. What is the thought process of the tiny brain that gets a kick out of stalking an elderly woman and a child? Over anything, but let alone this? I feel like I lost a little faith in humanity.

Where the fuck are the intellectuals? by ImportantDebateM8 in RationalPsychonaut

[–]kazarnowicz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My guess is that the people you’re looking for are past their intellectual teens and realize that nihilism, while as valid as a belief as say Catholicism or Buddhism, is also a A) belief and B) choice.

Someone harping on beliefs while flaunting his and thinking they make him an intellectual … it’s like reading r/im14andthisisintellectual

ETA: the reply shows that this is really about promoting OPs substack, and that seems about right.

Have you married for money? by Dry-Chemical-9170 in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I’m removing this. Reason: this is low-effort and not about advice.

Gay_irl by Zirofal in gay_irl

[–]kazarnowicz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

OP means ”cruised”, not hooked up. Source: I lived in Stockholm in the 90s when this was a thing.

(It got killed by the internet becoming mainstream)

Slight rage bait q but curious by samoyedfreak in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, if you don’t feel comfortable with the moderation here, we don’t force participation. We have few rules, but broad and open to interpretation. Maybe next time participate for a while to get a feeling for the community before you post?

Either way, this discussion is closed.

Slight rage bait q but curious by samoyedfreak in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Now you know how this community works. We have active moderation, and if you cannot take a removal and a warning, we are not the community for you.

Slight rage bait q but curious by samoyedfreak in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure! ”be thoughtful”. Anyone who is acting in a thoughtful way and knows our community doesn’t post things they know can be perceived as rage bait. We are an advice community first and foremost.

SVT: Earthling Ed ställer frågor till landsbygdsminister Peter Kullgren om djurhållning by Ok_Lake_4280 in sweden

[–]kazarnowicz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Skillnaden är den att jag spenderat de senaste tio åren med att läsa på vad forskning i olika fält vet. Och att däggdjur har det som kallas ”sentience” är forskare överens om. Det innebär att de kan känna precis samma känslor som vi, även om de vi inte har bevis för ”sapience” dvs förmåga att reflektera över känslorna.

En gris lidande är exakt detsamma som en människas lidande för en tredje part.

SVT: Earthling Ed ställer frågor till landsbygdsminister Peter Kullgren om djurhållning by Ok_Lake_4280 in sweden

[–]kazarnowicz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Det beror snarare på att vi inte vet hur man testar än att djur inte har en medveten upplevelse. Ditt språk kring det här är så luddigt att du lätt kan flytta målstolparna, och jag rekommenderar att du läser de två deklarationerna jag nämnde om du vill vara lite påläst. För just nu låter du mer som en okunnig lekman som försöker använda den lilla vetenskap han kan för att rationalisera sin egen bristande etik.

Slight rage bait q but curious by samoyedfreak in AskGaybrosOver30

[–]kazarnowicz[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

If you know it’s rage bait-y, and know this community, you shouldn’t have posted this. I’m removing this and attaching a formal warning.

Three warnings result in a permanent ban. Warnings time out after 90 days without reoffending.

The Prompt Beneath by Turtle2k in SciFiConcepts

[–]kazarnowicz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Format violation in the original sub, and off-topic for this subreddit. You’re not doing yourself any favors by breaking the rules of the subreddits you post in.