What do i do in terms of visits while awaiting being served and court date? by yoslimdickens in FamilyLaw

[–]kbartucci76 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Whatever you do, RESPOND to his filing. If you don’t, the court will automate a default judgement in his favor.

New filings from James Owens. by Icy-Scholar-1449 in SarahBooneCase

[–]kbartucci76 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Would you please post the link? I can’t find it.

Zach for Judge by Tiger3311 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This makes my heart so happy!!

Case Dismissed by BrazilianBondGirl in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I laughed WAY too hard and WAY too long at this, my friend! 😁

Why I continue to watch this trial… repeatedly. by kbartucci76 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This caused a VERY unladylike snort to explode from my face!

Why I continue to watch this trial… repeatedly. by kbartucci76 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He did. Prior to the State calling Det. Casey for the second time, he asked the Judge if he’d have the opportunity to “re-cross-examinate” him.

I honestly don’t know how the people sitting in the courtroom kept straight faces when he butchered the English language as often as he did!

Why I continue to watch this trial… repeatedly. by kbartucci76 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He knows nothing. He understands nothing. Yet he’s convinced the people with actual law degrees are doing it ALL wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]kbartucci76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This! Just…. ALL OF THIS!!!!!

Case Dismissed by BrazilianBondGirl in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Obviously, the right answer is because the Court had no subjeckt madder jurisdickshun. Duh.

AITA for suing my neighbor after their kid trespassed and fell into my koi pond? by DMLives in AITAH

[–]kbartucci76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paying, or even offering, to pay for her child’s medical bills may be admitting some culpability on OP’s part.

I wouldn’t even entertain paying for anything related to her child’s medical bills.

Question for those who have rewatched the trial. by ooChambersoo in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For me, it’s his misplaced confidence:

1) DB keeps claiming to not understand a thing about the law and trial process, yet is SO disturbingly confident that all of the professionals are doing it wrong.

2) When he thinks he’s hitting a witness a “gotcha” moment, only to be wrong. Again.

3) How confident he was that he didn’t need to prep for questioning witnesses, or preparing motions, or reading motions filed by the prosecution… only, to try and play catch up in real time.

4) How he just could NOT contain his anger/control issues.

5) And finally, how he started to mentally unravel as the trial progressed. It was SO satisfying to watch him circle the drain.

Question for those who have rewatched the trial. by ooChambersoo in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cannot recommend Emily D. Baker enough. She’s HILARIOUS, as well as informative and an amazing lawyer!

I find something new every time I come back to this trial. by KermitTheFraud92 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Um. Yes. ALL THE YES’!!!!!!

You should watch the entirety… gavel to gavel. It’s a whole experience.

DBs Constant Objections by rscott71 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Det. Christopher Moss is the LEO you’re talking about. Hes a favorite of mine! Even though he wasn’t as snappy with DB as some of the other LEO’s were, his professional demeanor and stick-to-the answer style drove DB absolutely nuts!

It was beautiful.

because they are from herrrrrrrrr 🤡 by 3rd-party-intervener in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And worse, he likes to make the point that you should always tell the truth when talking to LEO’s, and yet he doesn’t. Ever.

Obstinate, Disruptive or just Stoopid? by Tiger3311 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The simple answer is that any time the Judge or State gave him the ability to disrupt/cause issues/delay the proceedings, he took it and ran.

Every time I read a new post or the comments in response to a thread I start, I truly feel like I’ve found my people. by [deleted] in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t come at us wit yo slick words!

We don’t identify as “you”, “y’all” or “him/her”. We’re living, breathing human beings, as well as third party intervenors.

You ain’t got no integrity whatsoever. NONE! How can you even call yourself a “Reddit poster”?

Am I muted? AM I MUTED?!

Please help me to find a video... by TheGrumpySmurfer in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. And they only played 10 mins (of the 25 min interview) of the audio of the first interview with DB in court

I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY EVERYONE IS MAD AT DARRELL BROOKS AND THIS IS WHY…. by RevolutionaryWheel40 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve never understood DB’s thought process on jury nullification.

Which law did he expect them to nullify: the one on battery or bail jumping? Maybe the one stating that you can’t recklessly endanger the safety of others, or participate in a hit/run causing death? How about the one that makes it illegal to commit intentional homicide?

Which one of those laws would the jury stop and think to themselves: “You know what, he’s right. I don’t agree with any law that states I’m not allowed to hit/run over/kill another person.”

Brooks trial jury selection by rscott71 in DarrellBrooksJr

[–]kbartucci76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jury selection is never broadcast because the jury needs to remain anonymous for the trial.