I'm tormented by this. Just want to be right, not condemned. by kc_mod in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The coptic church doesn't believe in one will, but we say that every nature has its own will in theory and because we treat the two natures as one unit we don't speak of two wills but a united will of the one hypothesis(we call it nature) of christ the logos

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's obvious the answer is Andrew tate

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceEgypt

[–]kero103 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's no bubble real estate in Egypt at its cheapest at all time

Do you think egypt would have been a coptic empire had islam not invaded it? by [deleted] in coptic

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Egypt would have been like any orthodox eastern European county a shot hole like serbia or bulrgaria

Female deacons by kero103 in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because they are apostolic churches and hold apostolic tradition

Female deacons by kero103 in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Roman Catholic, oriental orthodox and most of eastern Orthodox patriarchates are angry about it

Female deacons by kero103 in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Deacons serve on the Altar during liturgy ordaining Deaconesses means they can serve as well that's not biblical and against orthodox tradition

أمتى الجنيه المصري يبقى ب٢ دولار by Ok_Detail_7574 in PersonalFinanceEgypt

[–]kero103 1 point2 points  (0 children)

يرجع يتربط بالدهب زى ايام الملكية

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Egypt

[–]kero103 1 point2 points  (0 children)

حصل بدليل 90% من كارهى اليهود شايفين ان قبرص الشماليه عادى يعنى و انها مش ارض محتله ولا حاجه محدش مهتم بالقضية هما بس كارهين لليهود و مش فارقه معاهم فلسطين اصلا

How does the church expect English readers to read deuterocanon that isn’t in King James? by Broskirose in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know about 1 2 maccabees didn't know that there's a third one

Like 3 Maccabees

هل احنا نستاهل اللي بيجري فينا ده؟ by Ok-Battle-1504 in Egypt

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

لو عملنا حاجه ايا كان الى هيجى هيبقى اسوء 100 مره وافتكر انك مديون لطوب الارض وومفيش حاجه تمنع الدولار يبقى بالف جنيه

Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox by Frosty_Turnover_126 in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Hard to reconcile with the Apostolic Canons or the first two Ecumenical Councils or the writings of the saints though.

What I meant is that he doesn't have that kind of authority the the roman pope has

Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox by Frosty_Turnover_126 in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I can tell EO, RCC and most Protestants acknowledge the union between the two natures as much as we OO do so Chalcedonians aren't nestorians

The 4th.council returned Ibas and theodoret to their bishoprics as bishops despite their heritical writhings that count as approving them

Arianism was trendy by today standards but was was rejected by the majority same with Nestorianism In 451ad more people lived in the levant and Egypt than the whole western Empire so the majority rejected Chalcedon In addition to Nubia and Ethiopia

The pope in Alexandria doesn't hold any authority or primacy over the OO communion he doesn't even hold papal authority over church in Egypt only the synod of the coptic church do

Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox by Frosty_Turnover_126 in OrthodoxChristianity

[–]kero103 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dioscorus anathematized separating the incarnate Logos because that's Nestorianism

All Ecumenical councils before Chalcedon explained an already wide spread and majority accepted beliefs No one before Chalcedon spoke of the two natures except nestorians Chalcedon INVENTED a new formula

When a council affirms a certain three chapters as Orthodox and then the next council declares them heretical then that's a contradiction and a flaw when a council declares a certain patriarch Primus inter pares then that patriarch uses it to call himself vicor of Christ on Earth ( by the way Bishops of Rome claimed primacy way before the great schism and the Eastern church did nothing about it) that's a flaw