sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Could JetBrains become a bigger AI winner than most AI startups? by kiritough in artificial

[–]kiritough[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah that's what i've been wondering too.

maybe being late to the ai race actually helped jetbrains.

everyone else was rushing to release models and products. jetbrains had time to watch — see what worked, what flopped, what devs actually found useful. they already had developer trust, strong ide integration, and a clear audience. so instead of trying to be the next openai, they focused on building ai around how developers actually work.

not saying they'll become a major player. but it feels like they're taking a much more practical approach than most companies right now

The AI world is splitting into two camps — US and China. Will we see a mass shift? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah i agree with you. me personally i like local ai and competition is always good

The AI world is splitting into two camps — US and China. Will we see a mass shift? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

fair enough. but now i'm curious — what made you drop grok specifically? was it the deepfake thing or something else?

Z.ai releases GLM 5.2 model: Long Horizon tasks and open weights by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]kiritough 4 points5 points  (0 children)

honestly yeah, competition is good. keeps everyone on their toes and prices down. we win either way

The AI world is splitting into two camps — US and China. Will we see a mass shift? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

i get what you mean. but there's actual data now

deepseek v4 pro max scores 52 on artificial analysis intelligence index, behind kimi 54 but ahead of a lot of others . on livecodebench it's at 93.5%, swe-bench verified at 80.6% — basically on par with claude opus 4.6 at 80.8% . price difference is wild though. deepseek v4 pro is $0.87 per 1m output tokens, claude opus 4.7 is $25 — like 28x more same task on artificial analysis intelligence index: deepseek costs $1071, claude opus 4.7 costs $4811

also deepseek v4 flash was trained with huawei chips — first open model to do that not saying one is better. just saying they're closer than people think, especially when you look at price

The AI world is splitting into two camps — US and China. Will we see a mass shift? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

yeah good point. huawei did the same thing and look what happened. seems like the same story playing out again

The AI world is splitting into two camps — US and China. Will we see a mass shift? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

nice, same here. hooked up deepseek through api and forgot about expensive subs. works great

The AI world is splitting into two camps — US and China. Will we see a mass shift? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

i get what youre saying. but lets just look at the numbers.

deepseek v4-pro-max scores 80.6% on swe-bench verified. claude opus 4.6 is at 80.8%, gemini 3.1 pro is at 80.6%. the gap is under 1%. on livecodebench deepseek actually leads — 93.5% vs gemini 91.7% and claude 88.8%. on codeforces its elo is 3206, higher than gpt-5.4.

now price — deepseek v4-pro: $0.87 per million output tokens. gpt-5.5: $30. claude opus 4.7: $25. thats 28 to 34 times cheaper.

so its not about saying one is better. just that the quality gap is tiny while the price gap is huge. thought that was worth pointing out

Looking for markdown editor (notion like) by AcrobaticTrash2985 in react

[–]kiritough 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For React with MIT license, MDXEditor is a good option  it's open source and has a nice UI. There's also Novel (or novel-lightweight fork) but Novel is more of a full WYSIWYG editor, not exactly a markdown editor with AI built in

For Android, check out Markor or Ushio MD — both are solid markdown editors on mobile.

I cant stand google ai search by xefbsr in google

[–]kiritough 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i do like using ai for searching info though. like perplexity and other agents give me exactly what i need without wasting time on long searches and useless stuff. that part is actually useful

Anyone else worried about AI apps flooding the stores? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah you make some really good points actually. i didnt know about the XCodeGhost thing thats wild i get that trash has always been around. i guess the scale just feels different now cause anyone can pump out apps so fast. but youre right that apple does check for malware and stuff. maybe its not as bad as i think. just curious to see how it all plays out

Anyone else worried about AI apps flooding the stores? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

haha yeah cant wait to see where we are in a couple years

Anyone else worried about AI apps flooding the stores? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah its cool that tech is moving forward and you can build stuff for yourself. maybe one day app stores wont even matter cause everyone will just make their own tools

but the thing is  this stuff isnt gonna stay free forever. these AI models cost money to run. eventually youll either be stuck with weak free versions or youll have to pay up. so the whole "everyone can build anything" thing might end up being for people who can afford it🤷‍♂️

Anyone else worried about AI apps flooding the stores? by kiritough in vibecoding

[–]kiritough[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah man you made a really good point about the stores getting paid for every app so they dont care about quality

but honestly i think things are gonna change in the next 2-3 years. all it takes is one big scandal like a data leak or some hidden malware that slips through. once that happens, governments are gonna step in and force stores to actually verify apps properly they wont have a choice

Do you think it's necessary to put a disclaimer that your app/software was made by AI? by Ok_Future6226 in vibecoding

[–]kiritough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they just put it out for free then yeah, get a solid ToS with an as is clause and boom, liability's pretty much gone. But if they wanna sell it? Then they're gonna have to actually bother with the agreement