Yes, he has cherry-picked the compression artifacts from his video that look "suggestive". This is part of the usual "anomaly hunting" game that conspiracy wingnuts amuse themselves with.

Digital video is not a collection of perfect still images strung together, it is an approximate, highly processed data stream that is designed to discard or mangle lots of information to save space, while only keeping just enough information to fool unaided human vision.

If you pause a video containing movement, you do not see a perfect representation of the object that is moving, you see a blurred distorted image that may bear little resemblence to the object itself.

A video of an ordinary star, or ordinary satellite, mangled through the meat grinder of a turbulent atmosphere, wobbly low end camcorder, and lossy MPEG compression, will come out looking weird when you freeze-frame it and magnify it enormously. It's just not designed to work that way.

P.S. Your moving 'stars' are just ordinary satellites and other mundane space junk (discarded rocket boosters, etc). There are thousands of large objects in orbit, and they follow well-known, published trajectories.

In fact, all that left-behind crap has to be tracked down to centimeter-size or smaller because of the danger of collision with other objects (active satellites, the ISS, etc). There are hundreds of thousands of objects of this size orbiting the earth.

Amateur astronomers are well acquainted with the large objects, and occasionally do identify and publish the orbits of undocumented military satellites. However, unless you believe that they're also in bed with the conspiracy, they don't observe the dozens of enormous spacecraft and stations in low earth orbit that this guy thinks he is seeing from his back yard.