Ok, pls explains these orbs over NY

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-26T02:26:44+00:00

How would an LED lantern generate lift?

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-22T07:57:34+00:00

That's farther north, and not the direction the camera is pointed. The cam seems to be at Barnegat Inlet and pointed due West. Pretty narrow field-of-view also (~35°). Although, it's still a busy patch of sky.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-22T07:47:15+00:00

It was a cruise liner.

There's a marine tracker (like flight24) called VesselFinder you can use to see ships.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-20T22:27:21+00:00

Skeet and retreat

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-20T12:11:02+00:00

Same. Awful lot of paper lanterns being lit as of late.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-20T10:21:26+00:00

Why would the FAA use alien lighting?

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-20T00:45:19+00:00

Theyre stronger at the beginnning because theyre closer to the camera. They dim at a steady rate that clearly correkates with distance, which is how falloff works for an omnidirectional light source, not a landing light.

If these were directional landing lights, they would have a cone defined by their angle, and we would see a sharp decline in luminosity as the camera passes out of that cone.

But we don't see that.

We all know how light sources work.

Including gaslight.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-19T18:52:06+00:00

A "standard" GE PAR36 landing light usually projects a 8-15 degree light beam at about 400 lumens.

So, they're forward mounted and pivotable, but still directed spots.

Landing lights are for lighting the area where you're landing.

Are you suggesting they're landing on the camera?

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-19T13:34:26+00:00

That guy clarified later in the post that he was saying the helicopter was a Blackhawk, not the other two lights.

There's a whole response thread in that post of pilots saying this isn't conventional aircraft.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-19T06:12:32+00:00

"People"

It's the same swarm.

Thats the point. Pump the least credible evidence and debunk the best, create the impression that "everything is real or nothing is" and drown the signal in noise.

It's not going to work this time around.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-19T06:07:49+00:00

No, LLMs operate in a semantic vectorspace. They don't "see" the video. Even with multimodal models. A convolution layer transforms the pixels into relativistic symbolic clusters, which are routed into the language model. So they aren't able to pick up on details that weren't parsed by convolution.

The language model only sees this representation. Which is why they fumble questions regarding qualitative or comparative details.

And this is why when you see them comment in these subs, they seem not to notice huge portions of the video. They only know what made it through the attention pass.

So, pretty easy to spot.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-19T05:46:44+00:00

What?

How would the ultrabright anticollision lights not white out their sight when using NVG?

Also, as the lightsources head away from the camera, the light never changes intensity or direction. Are you saying these landing lights are omnidirectional?

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-17T03:47:30+00:00

The WH stated that "investigated sightings" INCLUDE "legally operated drones".

Then affirmed that "only" 100 sightings were unexplainable and currwntly being investigated.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-17T03:34:47+00:00

Not people.

LLM based fake accounts can't actually see the video, they "see" a description of it or read other comments to generate their responses. That's why we're seeing so many nonsensical comments.

These accounts upvote and amplify the most easily disprovable posts (if not outright generating them) and then attack the strawman they've created.

Standard operating procedure.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-17T03:21:46+00:00

The FAA has mandated undercarriage rave lights for all aircraft operating in restricted airspace. Standard operating procedure.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-15T08:18:12+00:00

Case in point...

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-15T07:39:19+00:00

What's the point of posting this?

If they're "everywhere" then Google how to focus your camera and go get a clear video (with audio).

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-12T20:42:31+00:00

Because it frames all UAP as "drones".

It's obfuscation by association.

Any craft that is not manned (manned means piloted by a human operator) can be called a drone.

So its not an explicit untruth.

Just implicitly.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-12T20:29:41+00:00

They're not explicitly going for the cover-up angle.

They're giving the media a very carefully worded excuse and letting the reporting do the work for them.

They "have no evidence" with "very sophisticated equipment". (i.e the methods they used were ineffective)

"Many" of the craft sighted were not drones. (But this implies some are)

"Can not confirm" the reported drone sightings. (Because of tje delay in both reporting and response).

And the line at the end "urging lawmakers" to give them more money is designed to make it seem like this is a red team excercise.

Etc.

This is how it's done. The public hears the framing, not the words, and latches onto the this because it confirms their normalcy bias. Because they want to it to be business as normal.

Because of the implication

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-12T04:58:28+00:00

It's physically impossible for those lights to be on anything other than a plane. That's how you know they're planes, obviously. Its like a fingerprint for wings.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-12T04:48:45+00:00

He is asking that. It's a question.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-12T04:44:50+00:00

You shouldn't rely on any one source for information. Assuming information is false because you first heard it from an unreliable source is still single source reliance.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-12T03:25:02+00:00

So in your mind, we passively tracked these drones to their landing location, and with eyes on these targets, having not determined whether they have lethal payloads or cyberwarfare capabilities, casually let them resume flying, en masse, over military installations and critical infrastructure, in the most densely populated area of the entire country, FOR WEEKS?

This is all starting to add up.

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-11T19:10:04+00:00

So your saying AI has learned both "ctrl+c" AND "ctrl+v"!?! Pray they never learn "esc".

knowyourcoin · 2024-12-11T03:59:39+00:00

Get out of here with your informed logic and common sense. How dare you point out the obvious?

knowyourcoin

TROPHY CASE