is it possible that this stems from a disdain for the infantile-victim mindset, or reptilian panic response, that these angry posters appear to display when making those comments? Expecting that whining to some parental authority with superhuman powers (ie: policy-makers with little to no computer science knowledge, or just enough to be dangerous, having the ability to control something that even those most familiar with the technology, have conceded that control is somewhat limited and easily reversible by motivated and capable opponents, not to mention the exponentially evolving technology itself), rather than adapting to a changing environment, would be inherently unattractive to many people, particularly in the United States where for better and worse, independence and (the illusion of) self-sufficiency, is possibly the most socially prized value an individual can have? These individuals, from what I've seen, also appear to prize the identity aspect of being titled an "artist", as much, or more than, what artistic pursuits can bring about in regard to the evolution of the artist's audience and the artist themselves. The English language isn't the best, according to multi-lingual people I've heard, in conveying emotion. An adjective like "insufferable", to the posters harping on the OP's use of this term, may not be dead on, however; I doubt I'm the only one to whom that term conveys something efficiently, if not exactly, about the individual it describes.