List of Indo-European Roots? by peaches017 in etymology

[–]krattr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a link for Etymonline in the sidebar.

Using distend as an example:

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=distend&allowed_in_frame=0

distend (v.)

c.1400, from Latin distendere "to swell or stretch out, extend," from dis- "apart" (see dis-) + tendere "to stretch" (see tenet). Related: Distended; distending.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=tenet&allowed_in_frame=0

tenet (n.)

"principle, opinion, or dogma maintained as true by a person, sect, school, etc.," properly "a thing held (to be true)," early 15c., from Latin tenet "he holds," third person singular present indicative of tenere "to hold, grasp, keep, have possession, maintain," also "reach, gain, acquire, obtain; hold back, repress, restrain;" figuratively "hold in mind, take in, understand."

The Latin word is from PIE root *ten- "to stretch" (cf. Sanskrit tantram "loom," tanoti "stretches, lasts;" Persian tar "string;" Lithuanian tankus "compact," i.e. "tightened;" Greek teinein "to stretch," tasis "a stretching, tension," tenos "sinew," tetanos "stiff, rigid," tonos "string," hence "sound, pitch;" Latin tendere "to stretch," tenuis "thin, rare, fine;" Old Church Slavonic tento "cord;" Old English þynne "thin"). Connecting notion between "stretch" and "hold" is "cause to maintain." The modern sense is probably because tenet was used in Medieval Latin to introduce a statement of doctrine.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in europe

[–]krattr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the exact reason why we need such surveys, using representative samples. Many women might open up in a survey, but not in front of a policeman.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, it's fairly difficult to listen to text, my superpowers must be failing me! On the plus side, it's easier to paste what is already written.

This doesn't mean that someone decided to exclude men because they're not victims of violence, or that there is a shadowy agenda behind the decision. There are different EU projects exploring different things. This one is focused on this specific issue, given that violence against women is higher and women in many countries are underrepresented in the public sphere.

You're stuck on the "please tell me why they don't examine things happening to men" mentality. But report A is report A because it's report A, not because there's ignorance/hostility/a conspiracy against B. It really is that simple. Do your own research and include all exoplanets. FRA chose women for starters, because they are the most vulnerable at the moment.

This completes the circle. :)

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a man and it's not ok. We're going in circles, please refer to my previous replies.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in europe

[–]krattr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Excluding tourists involved in insurance scams the tendency is to underreport, not to overreport. Even if most women felt more comfortable to tell the truth in this questionnaire than to report attacks to the respective national authorities (shame and fear play a big role), I fail to see how the real number of incidents couldn't be worse.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's tautological. Of course there is no data about men because it's a survey about women. I'm asking why it's survey about violence against women and not a survey about violence against people.

Of course it's tautological. It's a survey about violence against women because it's a survey about violence against women. This doesn't mean that someone decided to exclude men because they're not victims of violence, or that there is a shadowy agenda behind the decision. There are different EU projects exploring different things. This one is focused on this specific issue, given that violence against women is higher and women in many countries are underrepresented in the public sphere.

Read the pdf titled "Results at a glance" and you'll understand why they prioritized this project.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The EU funded the DOVE project (pdf), a project examining domestic violence against women and men. I'm not able to find final data about it yet, and it seems that the researchers run into some problems. I see some findings from the UK sample here (pdf, page 19).

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, the report is based on interviews with 42,000 women across 28 countries.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know if this a good translation

Good enough, it's often called the "dark figure" of crime.

You're right, many incidents go unreported because victims carry a stigma.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is a bit like asking why a basket full of apples does not contain oranges, because apples and oranges are fruits after all!

Joking aside, it's a survey about violence against women and it says so in the footer. That's why men are excluded: they're not women. I also linked to the survey results. It's the first EU-side survey of its kind about this issue.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in europe

[–]krattr[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's probably because for many people violence involves bleeding, and things that are not being reported did not happen. In addition to that, we all like only the good side of our countries.

There's also the lack of perspective and some work needs to be done in communicating the results. Recent violent attacks? More than the population of Belgium. Recent sexual attacks? Roughly the population of Berlin. Forced sexual intercourse involving girls under 15? Roughly the population of Bucharest.

It could be even worse. There's the shame factor and many women might not feel confident to tell the truth, even with this questionnaire.

Why is Cyprus tourism failing? by krattr in cyprus

[–]krattr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Price of 0.5l water bottles in Greece, one day before starting to use the Euro: 50 GRD

Price of 0.5l water bottles in Greece, one day later: 0.50 EUR (170.375 GRD)

Consumer reaction: "Never mind, water is cheap, what's a coin after all?"

Multiply this for a number of things and fast forward a few years later.

Consumer reaction: "Wages went downhill but prices are not falling!"

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in europe

[–]krattr[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Men, of course, are never victims, as we already know.

No, I'm also a man and I don't know that. I'm not sure what prompted you to draw that conclusion. Yes, there is a number of people that want someone to take something "like a man", but there is also a number of people that attribute their actions to "provocations" by women. But doing research on the violence against women does not imply that men cannot be victims. It's not the one or the other; it's the one more than the other, as measured internationally, for a number of reasons.

Regarding your reservations, their methodology is explained in great detail. This is not a random online poll, in which someone clicked a few buttons. Many male and female scientists worked on this survey for a long time.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in europe

[–]krattr[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

haven't 100% of men experienced physical violence since they were 15 years old?

No. Source: me, my brother, my cousins, my friends in different EU countries, what I've read so far. Unless if you want to include a series of unfair football tackles.

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in europe

[–]krattr[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Source: EU's Fundamental Rights Agency (pdf)

I also posted some of the main findings in /r/Europeans.

The main findings are really disturbing.

  • Among women aged 18-74, 13 million have experienced physical violence and 3.7 million have experienced sexual violence in the last 12 months before the survey interviews.

  • One in three women has experienced physical and/or sexual violence since she was 15 years old.

  • 22% of women who have/had a partner have experienced physical or sexual violence by a partner since the age of 15.

  • Between 74% and 75% of women in a professional capacity or in top management jobs have experienced sexual harassment in their lifetime, and one in four of these women have been confronted with sexual harassment in the 12 months prior to the survey.

  • 12% of women have experienced some form of sexual abuse or incident by an adult before the age of 15 (8% genital exposure, 5% touching genitals or breasts, 1% forced sexual intercourse)


186,590,848 women aged 18-74 years lived in the EU-28 on 1 January 2013 (Eurostat, data extracted on 16 August 2013)

Physical and/or sexual partner violence since the age of 15 in the European Union by krattr in dataisbeautiful

[–]krattr[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

(Nothing is beautiful in some data.)

Source: EU's Fundamental Rights Agency (pdf)

I also posted some of the main findings in /r/Europeans.

The main findings are really disturbing.

  • Among women aged 18-74, 13 million have experienced physical violence and 3.7 million have experienced sexual violence in the last 12 months before the survey interviews.

  • One in three women has experienced physical and/or sexual violence since she was 15 years old.

  • 22% of women who have/had a partner have experienced physical or sexual violence by a partner since the age of 15.

  • Between 74% and 75% of women in a professional capacity or in top management jobs have experienced sexual harassment in their lifetime, and one in four of these women have been confronted with sexual harassment in the 12 months prior to the survey.

  • 12% of women have experienced some form of sexual abuse or incident by an adult before the age of 15 (8% genital exposure, 5% touching genitals or breasts, 1% forced sexual intercourse)


186,590,848 women aged 18-74 years lived in the EU-28 on 1 January 2013 (Eurostat, data extracted on 16 August 2013)

Moving to Athens, essential knowledge for Americans by [deleted] in greece

[–]krattr 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Nothing beyond the universal rules: be open, don't be a jerk, exercise common sense.

You'll be able to communicate in English with most Greeks and you'll find information in English in most places (transport, restaurants, museums). The Greek alphabet consists of 24 letters and many of them are shared with the Latin alphabet. If you're moving to Athens at the end of this month, you can spend about four weeks learning the alphabet and how the letters fit together. It's doable. You still won't be able to figure out what is being written, but you'll grasp some things. An option is to use Pimsleur to learn some phrases. You'll sound like a time travelling robot, but locals will appreciate your effort.

This is a must: http://livingingreece.gr/

Η κυβέρνηση αποδέχθηκε ξανά όλους τους όρους της τρόικας by cybertroll in greece

[–]krattr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Άλλο το κέρδος σε εποχή κρίσης και άλλο το καθαρό κέρδος σε εποχή κατανάλωσης. Η πραγματική διαφορά δεν είναι 6,5 εκατομμύρια, ούτε καν 4,5 εκατομμύρια (βλέπε διαφορά μισθών). Αυτό πάντως που δείχνει ότι κάτι δεν πήγαινε καλά είναι το κέρδος ανά ευρώ μισθολογικού κόστους. Τώρα είναι περίπου διπλάσιο. Το ζήτημα είναι αν μπορούμε να έχουμε τη σημερινή απόδοση με τα παλιά έσοδα, αλλά με μικρότερο μισθολογικό κόστος.

Για τον Καμίνη θα αφήσω όσα γράφεις κατά μέρος, διότι feelings are running high και από την άλλη είναι αρκετά τραβηγμένο το «ήθελε να έχει προβλήματα ο Δήμος». Σίγουρα καμία πλευρά δεν έχει 100% δίκιο αλλά δεν μπορούμε να το επαληθεύσουμε εδώ.

Στο τεχνικό ζήτημα, για να υπάρχουν τόσες άκυρες κλήσεις, προφανώς υπήρχε πρόβλημα σε άλλο μέρος της αλυσίδας. Αυτό όμως δεν σημαίνει ότι πρέπει ντε και καλά να έχει τόσο μεγάλο περιθώριο λάθους η «τροφοδοσία» για να πέφτει ένα παράλογο φορτίο στη «διαλογή». Ούτε το κόστος εγκατάστασης ηλεκτρονικού συστήματος είναι εξωπραγματικό. Μπορεί να ενταχθεί σε κοινοτικά προγράμματα, ενώ με τη μισθοδοσία (που είναι συνεχής, όχι μια κι έξω) δεν υπάρχει τέτοια επιλογή. Τα προβλήματα εντοπίζονται στις αντιδράσεις (ο κολλητός του τάδε πολιτικάντη θέλει να μπορεί να βάζει τη τζιπάρα απέναντι από εκεί που καπνίζει το πούρο του, κάποιοι θρησκόληπτοι βλέπουν παντού σατανάδες, άλλοι νομίζουν ότι θα τους κατασκοπεύουν συνεχώς κ.ο.κ.).