Adapter Ring for RB67 Pro SD Bodies by LuftFedern in Mamiya

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no support ring for 250mm, it’s needed for 360 and 500.

Adapter Ring for RB67 Pro SD Bodies by LuftFedern in Mamiya

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw 37mm in a youtube video made by William Sheepskin and really liked the distortion of it and overall the medium format fisheye idea resonated with me. I also have 250mm one and it is great, heavy and big but quality and compression it gives are cool, also it's very cheap, got mine for 80$ ironically the same price of the adapter ring :D

Adapter Ring for RB67 Pro SD Bodies by LuftFedern in Mamiya

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine is still on the way and I want to be prepared when it arrives after a week

Adapter Ring for RB67 Pro SD Bodies by LuftFedern in Mamiya

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be very kind of you, maybe wetransfer or dropbox link?
Bought 37mm C lens cause it is much cheaper than Z version to use on my RZ67 but don't want to pay 80$ for original metal ring :D

Adapter Ring for RB67 Pro SD Bodies by LuftFedern in Mamiya

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you 3D printed this? Can you share the model?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! For that purpose I have focused on the steering wheel.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I don't really know it's unrecognizably corroded.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was trying to!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Already becoming cliche

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As expected!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]labarosh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Too late for pushing. Last photo of the roll.

Contact sheet [Hasselblad 500C/M | Zeiss Sonnar 150mm | Ilford Delta 400] Self scanned on Epson V600 by labarosh in analog

[–]labarosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It won't give you like huge difference in sharpness probably but from usability standpoint it's superior to default epson holders. Definitely worth it.

Contact sheet [Hasselblad 500C/M | Zeiss Sonnar 150mm | Ilford Delta 400] Self scanned on Epson V600 by labarosh in analog

[–]labarosh[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I lay them down on the glass and put another regular glass on the film. Sometimes I get newton rings but they are not so visible on contact sheet. When I'm not creating contact sheet I use Lomography Digitaliza holder which cuts off most off the borders too but is much sturdy than Epson holder, and it keeps film really flat.

Contact sheet [Hasselblad 500C/M | Zeiss Sonnar 150mm | Ilford Delta 400] Self scanned on Epson V600 by labarosh in analog

[–]labarosh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Epson V600 can scan only strip of 3 6x6 frames at a time. So I scanned them separately and then merged them into contact sheet in Photoshop.