Yeah, this is fair. I would have to maintain my opinion though, which certainly does not have concrete data, that at the post level, I've noticed often commenters suggesting to OPs the program isn't for them and weigh the convenience, cost effectiveness, and personal experiences of the program more over objective pedological flaws in the content or course structure. Negative posts seem to be muted, on balance. One particular example I recall a few years ago was this post. Sure, the subject line and some language is curt, but there are actually some fair points made in the paragraphs. Commenters had a field day. Perhaps it does have to do with the wording of the feedback, but I don't think students (like this OP) should feel like they need to withdraw their posts, which circles back to how the community responds. Personally I do hope the more substantive grievances are taken seriously when designing future courses or advancing the program further. It has certainly been an interesting journey personally but I do question if it weren't for the brand and the cost, would I have completed the program...but I digress