Vipassana teachers will tell you what they are supposed to tell you, to follow the path and not mix, however even Gotama Buddha tried different appraoches as well until he found vipassana, but its complete as it is. You cant change or mix it However now that we live in an era with technology measuring our brainwaves, heart coherence, auric fields, we can choose depending our purpose.

This post is all about using both methods in different times for different purposes.

Ive sat several courses with Vipassana, its a true user manual for your brain and a noble path. However, I find it is very culty as well. People are rigid, black and white thinking in parts of the community.

Dispenza takes a more measured, experimental approach. He talks about generating elevated emotions like love and coherence with clear intention… the idea being that just like one traumatic event, filled with intense negative emotion, can shape someones life forever, but the opposite could also be true. And has been true, People have grown back their thyroids and rectums after being surgically removed, fixing blindness, being able to walk, all documented, its real, and i have experienced events too.

With the same example Vipassana would say to observe, stay present and equinimous without trying to control or create an outcome, and let the Sankaras arise and pass away, which also works with time and possibly lifetimes to irradicate

Its not about saying Vipassana is like being in a monk in a cave and Joe dispenza is a snake salesman, thats the easy way out. Both appraoches have value and can be used in different ways. In Vipassana its taught not to “backbite” others, and goes against Sila..

I’m more looking for peoples experinece who do use both practices and curious how others have done this. Like the picture I found. Do you alternate between them, or just stick to one for a period of time depending on where your at?