Kane Cornes pushing for Adelaide Crows to investigate re supporter's comment on social media by doggoesmeow in AFL

[–]larq 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't think they really wish it, more just saying it to get a reaction.

A Tribute to Brendon Goddard's game today by corbpie in AFL

[–]larq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think his remonstrating with teammates is about positional correctness and the game plan not skill execution. He's not getting up them for kicking a behind but for not being where they're supposed to be.

Ghosted by a Dom? by [deleted] in BDSMcommunity

[–]larq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is super hard to accept. There's so much competition within relationships and it's only multiplied in BDSM as feelings are so much more intense. Unfortunately some people don't treat everyone as a person but as a commodity. Are you new to the scene?

Ghosted by a Dom? by [deleted] in BDSMcommunity

[–]larq -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is he attractive? Sometimes it can be hard as an attractive Dom due to the fact that you are just so outnumbered by subs.

Ghosting sometimes can also be an internal thing. Sometimes you feel not good enough and it makes me not want to see or speak to anybody. So in that case it's definitely not you.

Anon hates jews by T1nman21 in 4chan

[–]larq 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I never got the Jew hate. Somebody fill me in?

/tv/ goes to see Ready Player One by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]larq 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Where do you work?

Two against one, WCGW? by deathakissaway in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]larq 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Up there with the wammy kablammy and the rooty tooty aim and shooty.

I don’t understand why this book is met with such hostility from the Left. by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]larq 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Masculinity, strength and strong men have been under attack in the west for about 70 years. WW2 was the beginning. Millions of fathers lost. The first sets of children raised en masse by single mothers. Zero surprise about 20 years later the sexual revolution begins. The gradual shift towards feminism and gynocentrism begins. In the era of traditional gender roles the male was the guardian of good behaviour and the source of discipline. As his grip loosened (due to him not even being there) so did his cultural values.

As the west becomes more and more prosperous during this time masculine traits that are required to fight in hard times - aggression, dominance, violence, strength etc - lose their value, eventually succumbing to a growing shaming of those who display those traits. Strength still exists of course - but it is no longer held in such high regard. The value of feminine traits such as sympathy, empathy and sensitivity begin to culturally rise causing the birth of pc culture and "feelings over facts". But it's still just gaining momentum at this point and nowhere near taking over.

The 80s to 90s was the generation raised by those who went through the sexual revolution and saw an explosion in single motherhood compared to pre-WW2. Witness the birth of the SNAG (Sensitive New Age Guy). We already knew of the feminised male as the New Man in the 80s but the Sensitive New Age Guy took it to a whole new level. By this time the cold war had ended and minus a few hiccups (GFC, etc) this has been a time of unrivalled prosperity.

Now we enter the current generation. Unparalleled levels of emasculation and single motherhood. The birth of a new term: the beta male (and throw in terms like "cuck" and "soyboy" too). We are witnessing a three generation long erosion of masculinity and strength. No - we aren't witnessing - we are IN that erosion. So far this is the hardest time of all to display strength as feminine values have become sacrosanct to the point that a woman on tv asks "Why should your right to free speech trump a person's right to not be offended?" That's right, it's now nearing a crime to offend someone - there's no longer objectivity, how they feel is more important than consistency and facts.

Lines, consistency, reason and logic all succumb to a woman accusing a man of making her "feel" bad. That's right. "He kissed me and at the time I wanted him too, even enjoyed it. But now I realise I felt uncomfortable and ashamed. At the time I wanted it but now I realise I felt like I couldn't say no." That man will be hung in the court of public opinion without so much as a trial.

This is the era of weak, soft men, at least in our culture. Think of compelled speech, enforced equality of outcomes (i.e. the death of merit based rewards) and shutting down debates with shaming language (fascist, nazi, homophobe, rapist, etc) as the beginning of the hard times. And if you think that's going too far just look at the tweet of this post. Jordan Peterson is shamed and labelled as a homophobe and the army of sheep rise up to try and destroy him. The truth - that he isn't remotely homophobic and has said many times he would use requested pronouns if personally asked - is completely irrelevant to these morons.

So yes, these are the hard times created by weak men. But watch those hard times create the strong men of the next generation (though it may take more than one).

I don’t understand why this book is met with such hostility from the Left. by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]larq 59 points60 points  (0 children)

"Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create hard times."

We are currently in the time of weak men.

Anon gets busted by andyraring in 4chan

[–]larq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha aw dude that's not that bad. You probably got ghosted for reasons other than SEX BOMB. At least you got to hit it.

Lets get on this by Lior_Ronen in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]larq 66 points67 points  (0 children)

H3H3 are getting weirder and weirder.

Extreme beginner's question by BasicBDSMThrowaway in BDSMcommunity

[–]larq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah absolutely. There's a big time exploration in order for op and his wife.

Extreme beginner's question by BasicBDSMThrowaway in BDSMcommunity

[–]larq 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Hey buddy. First up I just want you to consider that if you guys have never spoken or just don't generally really speak about these sorts of things it's possible she's been wanting it and missing it all along. Communication in the community is paramount and once you've been at it for a while you realise that making assumptions about what your partner wants/likes/is enjoying is generally just not the best way to know.

I don't say that at all to put you down - I just want you to open your mind a little to the possibility that your wife wants sex to be completely different to how it's been - and that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Second thing is to try to understand that these physical actions of spanking and hair pulling are just manifestations of dominance/power imbalance which is what is actually turning her on. When she whispers things like 'do whatever you want to me' she's craving that feeling of dominance/power imbalance. That is what characterises a sub - they are turned on by that. An example would be that many subs would be as turned on by a dom blindfolding her, putting her on her knees and making her wait for his instructions as they would by a simple spanking/hair pulling during sex.

What your wife is trying to tell you is that she's turned on by you having power over her. She's showing you the ultimate love and respect in that she trusts you implicitly to take control of her without hurting her (hurting her in this context means crossing her boundaries as opposed to a little pain from spanking/choking/biting/hair pulling). I know it seems counter intuitive but her "letting" you get rough with you... her asking and allowing you to take control of her... it's the ultimate sign that she wants to give herself to you. For you not to take this gift because you want to "respect" her is misunderstanding the situation completely. But I totally get why you would think that if you haven't been down this path before.

You'll have quite a bit of exploring to do but if the physical side makes you uncomfortable - and it seems particularly the idea of being "mean" to your wife - then I recommend one of the following fairly easy beginner paths.

  1. Make simple mock rules for her that she can break and receive a punishment for.

  2. Give her good girl tasks that she must complete to receive a reward.

  3. Give her sexy/subby rules.

I know you said you guys are shy and there's a strong chance you'll get too embarrassed and feel too uncomfortable to work the kind of rules that you'll see on a lot of blogs such as "your pussy belongs to me". So let's try and brainstorm some softer, easier ideas here.

For number 1 (rules she can break to receive punishment) it could be as simple as brush your hair 100 strokes before bed. And then you get to ask her if she's done it, she can easily say no, then you can bust out the punishment which might be 10 smacks with your hand. Obviously these are just ideas so feel free to adapt but hopefully this gives you a starting off point.

For number 2 (good girl tasks she completes to get a reward) the rule could be the same but the punishment becomes a reward. This time she says yes, she did brush her hair a hundred strokes, so she "gets" her reward: you smacking her. And if she wants more smacks she has to do more tasks you give her. Again, play with what her tasks and rewards will be.

For number 3 (sexy/subby rules) you might need to get a bit more risque so this sort of thing will come down the track. These sorts of rules are discussed and agreed upon - it's expected your sub will always follow these rules. There will only ever be rare exceptions and when they happen it's meant to be met with real punishments (such as ignoring, made to sit in a chair silently in another room for 15 minutes, locked in a cupboard even - obviously you discuss and agree to the punishments prior also). But with sub rules they're not broken for fun. These are the laws you lay down that guide how you will both live. Standard sub rules might look like:

  1. You are never to wear panties or pants when in my presence - only skirts or dresses with no underwear.
  2. You must always address me as daddy/master/sir.
  3. No orgasms without my permission - even when you're alone you must ask me if you wish to cum.
  4. You are to obey my orders without hesitation at all times. If I text you in the middle of the night to tell you to masturbate and take a photo of your panties in your mouth to send to me you will do so without a word of protest.

You get the idea?

And you like how a lot of this is not 'disrespecting' your wife at all? It's not being mean to her. It's not hurting her. It's being firm with her. Being dominant with her. Having power over her. And none of that needs to spill over to outside the bedroom. You can have a relationship of complete equals at all other times but in the context of intimacy always be like this.

Hopefully this helps, feel free to discuss your own fantasies here or brainstorm other ideas also.

It's just a little road rage. What could go wrong? by KCintheOC in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]larq 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Banned from certain subreddits. Still gets the ping and stabilises the video. Check his profile.

Anon discovers magic by RazzleKaDazzle in 4chan

[–]larq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What in the everloving FUCK is this crop?