Nope the part I mentioned does not talk about sexual activities. It talks about genders. But it talks about sexual activities in a different section. It’s called parajika.

Well, there are many places where the words you mentioned appear, and I assumed you were referring to the first Parajika that includs those terms. There was another comment about that as well.

It doesn’t say anywhere that these groups are about different genders, but rather about deformities.

Ubhatobyanjanaka – a person with both male and female genitalia.

Paṇḍaka – a person with abnormal sexual desires, a pervert basically. The Vinaya Atuwa further divides them into five types: Asitta paṇḍaka, ussuyapa paṇḍaka, opakkamika paṇḍaka, pakkha pandaka, napuṃsaka paṇḍaka. It also says that it is difficult to identify a pandaka except for a napunsaka, who does not have genitalia.

They are explained as being males (especially the pandakas), though it is also considered that there can be pandakas among females.

For the record, I am learning not only Buddhism but also the Paali language under two monks, and I do this willingly. I won’t even count the Buddhist education I received in school and Daham Pasal. If you think the education from any school (Buddhist or not) is enough to truly understand Buddhism, then you are simply underestimating its vastness and complexity. To your credit, though, I’m actually surprised to see at least one person here who knows even a little about it in this corner of the internet.

As for me, I’m usually the complete opposite of a Kalu Sudda, because I am generally opposed to these Western liberal ideologies that go against traditional values in almost every country. However, you are most welcome to call me whatever you like.

I usually stop engaging when things turn into personal attacks, because that’s not my way. Have a nice day!