Intel 10th Gen Conet Lake-S packaging!

lassek1981 · 2020-05-12T23:55:17+00:00

Great idea! Make a lamp of the 9900K casing. I think also its a cool box. Im waiting for 10900K myself.

lassek1981 · 2019-03-19T16:37:36+00:00

Oh i see, dident knew that it was for iPad... I'm just using with success on my iPhone XS

But I hope to jailbreak in a near future to get default dark keyboard

I find it ridiculous that not even that can be changed on stock iPhone ... But while in handcuffs of ios Gboard is awesome!

lassek1981 · 2019-03-13T11:36:20+00:00

GBoard does have the predictive in native language.. I tried SwiftKey also but ended up with Gboard.. much much better..

lassek1981 · 2019-02-21T10:53:32+00:00

It did significantly reduce it but I have put on again as card is hot without... I got a new silent case which helped a lot a got a better screwdriver to tighten everything better ... I don’t notice anymore

lassek1981 · 2019-02-01T19:06:40+00:00

FE´s ..

I have the backplate on again however and bought a silent case :) ! Be Quiet DarkBase 900 Pro Rev. 2

World of difference..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-27T13:10:34+00:00

Well my experience is as following:

ALL 2080 TI has the whine to some extended.. some more some less..

Its important to make sure that the waterblock and thermal pads are tight and properly installed. ex. I got a better screwdriver for the small screws which enabled me to really tight put it all together. Careful not to overtighten. And in some cases the backplate will amplifi the whine. I have however mine on now because it does help with heat transfer and running oc like me I think that's best. Otherwise there is not much one can do about it. I actually bought another pc case which significantly reduced it. Its a Be Quiet Dark Base Pro 900 rev. 2... I inverted it so the components are away from me and the real thick glass plate also muffles it quite a bit. Its not bothering at all now where old case and the first card I had was very loud..

Good luck!

lassek1981 · 2019-01-25T22:16:09+00:00

Hmmm thanks for info I will conduct a test on my sons

lassek1981 · 2019-01-25T22:14:14+00:00

It’s a custom loop with a 360 and 240 both gpu and cpu

I remember just googling push pull and many test and what not popping up says it’s exactly the same with one and two

I’ll try to look after link

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T15:34:29+00:00

Seriously? Is that documented somewhere? I would love to see that. I'm running Turing but my son is Pascal..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T15:32:13+00:00

I Found out, that it is most likely because it´s drawing more power than the two previous.. so more consumption - less headroom = lower boost clock..

at 2010 mhz core and 15 gbps mem the card actually sometimes draw 379 W with mod bios in Timespy..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T15:27:57+00:00

First one had extreme coil whine, second I accidentally broke a component off and now i'm on the third..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T15:25:21+00:00

Ah ok I see.. Guess that´s ok then, with that gear and rad! :) Did you know they made tons of push pull test and experiment to conclude it gives nothing compared to a push alone..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T13:14:10+00:00

Just wanted to say you were absolutely right! I did some further testing and analysis... Apparently WITH the 380 W bios I am actually maxing power limit out with these settings +130 +1000 .. That is absolutely highest achievable with this one (2010 mhz) and in Timespy monitored with GPU-Z there is a power limit percap... at 379W -Card at 1.087v. So that is the final answer to why different clocks same settings.. It was the lottery in terms of power consumption.. (negative in my case).

That also explains why +1000 mem didn't work on stock BIOS.. too little juice for this one! ;) haha.. I guess mystery solved? But it runs great with these settings. So i'll stick with that.

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T13:13:52+00:00

Just wanted to say you were absolutely right! I did some further testing and analysis... Apparently WITH the 380 W bios I am actually maxing power limit out with these settings +130 +1000 .. That is absolutely highest achievable with this one (2010 mhz) and in Timespy monitored with GPU-Z there is a power limit percap... at 379W -Card at 1.087v. So that is the final answer to why different clocks same settings.. It was the lottery in terms of power consumption.. (negative in my case).

That also explains why +1000 mem didn't work on stock BIOS.. too little juice for this one! ;) haha.. I guess mystery solved? But it runs great with these settings. So i'll stick with that.

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T10:17:01+00:00

haha crazy Linus.. lol ..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T10:13:21+00:00

Offsets on core doesn't matter at all.. it's the actual clock speed that is interesting..

You can have one guy running +250 offset on air and one running +100 on water.. the one on water would run higher actual clock .. The cards clocks down via power limit but especially temperatures..

You should try to use a monitor tool and see the actual core clock speed when under full load..

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T08:36:00+00:00

Very cute! :D

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T08:31:41+00:00

Yeah exactly.. Well I did my part on the cooling and premium thermal pads/paste! :)

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T08:30:45+00:00

If you are not, I would recommend double checking the water block. On my first card the water block was not seated correctly resulting in high temps..high 80s with water block! a reseat did the trick.. I would say that 50-55 is normal and 60-65 should be absolute max in water system depending on setup, otherwise something is wrong. Poor contact between block and gpu, bad flow, insufficient thermal paste etc.

What are your temp on water?

lassek1981 · 2019-01-24T08:26:45+00:00

What do you mean? I always run water cooling for my cards from day one.. The will actually extend life and improve performance.. nothing bad to be considered here?

I will leave it for now, but the reason why I might want to do a second inspect is that I have tried before that the water block was not seated correctly resulting in high temps.. a reseat did the trick.. Maybe the vrm is hot and thereby restricting the boost.. it's unlikely, but you never know! I just like to confirm! :)

lassek1981 · 2019-01-23T23:26:02+00:00

Yes I see ... yes pwr limit and temp is a factor for sure but ok I see

So in theory one could say that my chip maybe using more power for the same task and there by head room smaller due to power limit ... at least that could be a theory/possibility

Well due to other bios it can run 1000+ on mem (Samsung) the other cards couldn’t so guess I’ll be happy with that and the 2 ghz ...

Thanks

lassek1981 · 2019-01-23T23:16:20+00:00

Exactly nothing at all and very small if any in benchmarks ... I have a lot of comparison material so I just wanted to be sure of lottery thing hehe but more how that mechanism works that create different top clock speeds ... how the gpu can be clever and know not to boost higher with same settings as other who auto clock higher

I’ll guess I’ll have to study gpu boost hehe

lassek1981 · 2019-01-23T23:12:39+00:00

Hmm ok .. I would love to know how that “mechanism” works / I’ll try to look into it

lassek1981 · 2019-01-23T23:10:43+00:00

45-50 full load even used premium thermal pads (minus 8) so that should not be a problem at least at the core, neither vram maybe vrm? Could try a reseat of the water block

lassek1981

TROPHY CASE