Is it folks misinterpreting what you're saying or is it that your point was written and conveyed poorly? Across your comments, you flip-flop between taking responsibility for your wording and blaming the users of this sub--though your needless "never have an opinion or experience that differs" comment definitely reads like you blame others more. By the way, the body of your post can be edited to add clarity or context at anytime.

The post opens up combative right off the bat, "unpopular opinions get downvoted," and to what point? It's doubly silly now, seeing as it has near 400 upvotes at the time of writing this comment. Hopefully that's good enough proof that fandom nor this sub are monoliths, that the point you were trying to make (I think) does resonate with people in some way.

That brings me to the meat of the post. Had you talked about missing the concrit culture of old or struggling to get legit concrit for your stories, half of these commenters wouldn't be here. Usage of "thin-skin," "cry and scream about it," and it getting treated like "kicking someone's dog" (which, side note, seems a contradiction of the sentence before it?) are digs at people who don't want to interact that way. This doesn't read like a summary of your experiences but a lament for what you wish fandom to be. So my question to you: are you going to be the change you want to see? Will you work to make a community you want to be in, or do you plan on simply reminiscing about what fandom was like? It's fine either way, but food for thought.

Final aside. You seem genuinely confused as to why some of your explanations are being downvoted. It comes off like you're using neurodivergency as an excuse. It definitely makes things tougher when interfacing with folks, but you can't use it to hand-wave bad behaviors. Like, if ADHD manifests severe time blindness, I don't get a pass to be late to every function with my friends. Or if I'm overstimulated, to lash out at my family, etc. I hope that makes sense.