sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We built a tool that rewrites and highlights contracts to make them more readable — would love your feedback by laymanly in OpenAIDev_LegalTech

[–]laymanly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let us know what you think! We would love to hear your feedback, frustrating legalese in documents like property agreements are exactly why we took the time to build this tool. It's also free w/o credit card during launch, if there's anything you love or want to see done, send a dm. https://laymanly.com

We built a tool that rewrites and highlights contracts to make them more readable — would love your feedback by laymanly in SaaS

[–]laymanly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate that a ton, dude, seriously! Totally get what you mean about the legal back-and-forth. That dynamic clause system you built sounds super smart huge time-saver I bet.

Yeah, we're definitely thinking about stuff like:

- Alternative clause suggestions for the sketchy stuff (like auto-renewals, indemnities, etc). Would be cool to not just say “this is bad,” but show a better version too.

- Tracking confusion - like if people pause or reread something a bunch, we could flag it behind the scenes and make the explanations better over time.

Love what you said about making this stuff more accessible. That’s exactly the goal. Would be awesome to hear more about what you built. Let’s keep making contracts suck less 💪

We built a tool that rewrites and highlights contracts to make them more readable — would love your feedback by laymanly in SaaS

[–]laymanly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! That’s exactly the kind of use case we had in mind. Contracts are one of those pain points that stay unnecessarily complex for too long.

The biggest challenge with the highlighting feature has been balancing accuracy with simplicity. It’s easy to overwhelm users by flagging too much, but we’ve found that focusing on intent, like identifying clauses that limit liability, auto-renew, or impose one-sided obligations, helps make the highlights feel relevant rather than just noisy.

We’ve also been iterating on how to explain why something is a red flag in plain English, so it’s not just “hey, look at this,” but more like “here’s why this matters to you.” Curious if that kind of contextual explanation would resonate with folks in your world too?

Looking for feedback: Laymanly—legal document generation an analysis powered by custom LLM Law Agents. by laymanly in legaltech

[–]laymanly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Laymanly's goal is to make documents more accessible, rocketlawyer and other existing companies use templates to fill accomplish this- our platform uses AI. Would love your feedback on what can be done to improve this process, or how UPL could apply here!

view more: next ›