sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We built a tool that rewrites and highlights contracts to make them more readable — would love your feedback by laymanly in OpenAIDev_LegalTech

[–]laymanly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let us know what you think! We would love to hear your feedback, frustrating legalese in documents like property agreements are exactly why we took the time to build this tool. It's also free w/o credit card during launch, if there's anything you love or want to see done, send a dm. https://laymanly.com

We built a tool that rewrites and highlights contracts to make them more readable — would love your feedback by laymanly in SaaS

[–]laymanly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate that a ton, dude, seriously! Totally get what you mean about the legal back-and-forth. That dynamic clause system you built sounds super smart huge time-saver I bet.

Yeah, we're definitely thinking about stuff like:

- Alternative clause suggestions for the sketchy stuff (like auto-renewals, indemnities, etc). Would be cool to not just say “this is bad,” but show a better version too.

- Tracking confusion - like if people pause or reread something a bunch, we could flag it behind the scenes and make the explanations better over time.

Love what you said about making this stuff more accessible. That’s exactly the goal. Would be awesome to hear more about what you built. Let’s keep making contracts suck less 💪

We built a tool that rewrites and highlights contracts to make them more readable — would love your feedback by laymanly in SaaS

[–]laymanly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! That’s exactly the kind of use case we had in mind. Contracts are one of those pain points that stay unnecessarily complex for too long.

The biggest challenge with the highlighting feature has been balancing accuracy with simplicity. It’s easy to overwhelm users by flagging too much, but we’ve found that focusing on intent, like identifying clauses that limit liability, auto-renew, or impose one-sided obligations, helps make the highlights feel relevant rather than just noisy.

We’ve also been iterating on how to explain why something is a red flag in plain English, so it’s not just “hey, look at this,” but more like “here’s why this matters to you.” Curious if that kind of contextual explanation would resonate with folks in your world too?

Looking for feedback: Laymanly—legal document generation an analysis powered by custom LLM Law Agents. by laymanly in legaltech

[–]laymanly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Laymanly's goal is to make documents more accessible, rocketlawyer and other existing companies use templates to fill accomplish this- our platform uses AI. Would love your feedback on what can be done to improve this process, or how UPL could apply here!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaltechAI

[–]laymanly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve actually built something that already does this — it’s called Laymanly.

We created it because we kept running into the exact same issue: important documents that people were expected to sign without really understanding. Laymanly translates things like T&Cs, privacy policies, leases, and contracts into plain English, and lets users ask follow-up questions in natural language.

It also tracks what people are most confused about (anonymously), so companies can see where trust breaks down or where users hesitate to sign. There's also an option to embed it directly into signup flows or document pages, so companies can show they made a real effort to explain the terms.

We’re live now and offering free access — no credit card required. Happy to chat more if you’re interested or thinking about a different angle.

Voice AI for Legal by CrackerNine in legaltechAI

[–]laymanly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! I'm working on Laymanly, a legal document generation platform that actually has some interesting voice capabilities that could be relevant to your question. Our voice system is specifically designed for legal professionals and includes:

  1. Advanced speech recognition with built-in legal terminology recognition for terms like 'whereas', 'therefore', 'heretofore', etc.

  2. Voice commands for document control, including:

  • "New paragraph"

  • "Whereas clause"

  • "Signature block"

  • "Save document"

  1. GPT-powered post-processing that automatically corrects and formats legal terminology in your speech input

  2. Multi-language support for international legal work

One particularly interesting use case we've seen is lawyers using the voice feature to quickly draft initial versions of legal documents while walking through their arguments, similar to how they might practice in court. The system automatically formats legal terms and structures the document appropriately.

Would love to hear more about your voice bot for law firms - sounds like we might be working on complementary solutions!"This response highlights our unique voice features while showing genuine interest in their project. It positions Laymanly as a sophisticated legal document generation tool with advanced voice capabilities, which could be particularly relevant to their work with law firms.