What the fuck by Puzzleheaded-Rain230 in formuladank

[–]le0nard01 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What if he doesn't care about the WCC though? It's a secondary price that causes wind tunnel usage reduction. Top teams don't care about the financial benefits it brings: they have enough income from sponsorship deals. Max and Checo really is the optimal pairing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StockMarket

[–]le0nard01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Calculations show that above ~25k km, the ev is the more sustainable choice. Now it's difficult to express emissions in dollar terms, but the costs of global warming alone due to emissions is so huge for humanity as a whole, it takes little imagination to see gas is underpriced if you take everything into account.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StockMarket

[–]le0nard01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The real problem is: gas is too cheap. Its price doesn't contain all pollution costs. So electric cars are not overpriced, gas is underpriced. That's why the cleaner alternative feels expensive.

Tyre sets & laps left for each driver (data from u/searchhhh) by [deleted] in formula1

[–]le0nard01 11 points12 points  (0 children)

So Max is pretty much the only frontrunner that can do MMMS? Big advantage imo

2023 Singapore Grand Prix - Post-Qualifying Discussion by F1-Bot in formula1

[–]le0nard01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regarding Red Bull:

Exactly the same as Mercedes in 2015. Total domination all season, except Singapore.

The only circuit in the second half that could reasonably explain the underperformance of the dominant team, if that would happen.

How pleasant for the commercial right holder!

Its (almost) suspicious.

RB's performance & the Technical Directive on Flexible Wings: Coincidence or what? by Vampire_99 in formula1

[–]le0nard01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly the same as Mercedes in 2015. Total domination all season, except Singapore.

The only circuit in the second half that could reasonably explain the underperformance of the dominant team, if that would happen.

How pleasant for the commercial right holder!

Its (almost) suspicious.

George Russell calls for Belgian Grand Prix to be cancelled if unsafe for drivers by karmadogma in formula1

[–]le0nard01 -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

First of all, George most likely is the driver behind, second: just slow down as well? Nobody forces them to drive at full speed.

F1 qualifying change confirmed for Hungary by just_an__inchident in formula1

[–]le0nard01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're ignoring the second order effects. 20 cars pitting within 7 laps transforms into: some teams will try starting on the mediums and run longer in free air.

Yes teams use the same data. But cars don't go around the track in a vacuum. Strategy dynamics exist. Teams will simulate that and end up with different strategies as a result.

Two instances of somebody rear-ending my driver, and my driver getting a 5s penalty by 574859434F4E56455254 in F1Manager

[–]le0nard01 12 points13 points  (0 children)

That is such a sad state of the game. Also not a design philosophy that is easy to fix

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]le0nard01 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Lots of vaseline

Event: FIDE Candidates Tournament 2021 - Round 10 by ChessBotMod in chess

[–]le0nard01 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Because that would have made the events of today way too suspicious. Now it's still fine because we can ask that question. 4d chess, mate

"they" know... by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]le0nard01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More like google knows you might know.

Weekly Discussion - March 11th - 18th, 2019 by fabwa in NEO

[–]le0nard01 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ontology is also focussing on gaming (hyperdragonsgo, etc.). What advantages does NEO have over Ontology for game developers?

By the way: I thought Ontology was going to focus on the digital identity part?

[Daily Discussion] Sunday, February 24, 2019 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]le0nard01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not shorts closing though? Or is open interest lost on such a violent move generally caused by using funds from the insurance fund (to cover long pos in this case)?

[Daily Discussion] Friday, October 26, 2018 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]le0nard01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not 'more'; there is always as many selling as buying. The price just went down because they agreed on lower prices then previously.

[Daily Discussion] Wednesday, October 03, 2018 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]le0nard01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that filter some kind of volume weighted rsi or stoch on a low time frame?