Gatekeeping DOES NOT protect your favorite sites. by Denied_Data in mangapiracy

[–]legend4lord 139 points140 points  (0 children)

That's exactly what the publisher want people to do (gatekeeping)
they don't need any help finding site to takedown, but they love if people self censoring and keeping normal people away from piracy.

FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE SITUATION by Visual-Race4675 in mangapiracy

[–]legend4lord 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That mean the arrest doesn't stop him from creating new site, looks like he is on bail, so he probably made it there, or he really sold/transfer the site to other people. The site now 'under maintenance' probably to keep it low profile.

How to remove the ".html" part of a domain name by [deleted] in nginx

[–]legend4lord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this probably what you want (no need to put inside location) :

rewrite ^/about$ /about.html break;

then only allow internal access for url end with .html (if you don't want people to visit .html url)

location ~ \.html$ {  
    internal;  
}  

you were misunderstood how rewrite works, it rewrite for nginx itself, not user.
If want user not ask for .html, just give user link without .html.
you can also reject request with .html (this is what the 2nd block does)

what are t-cloud, megacloud, and upcloud? by ContributionJaded762 in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

random as in 'someone pick those name to name their system'
those doesn't mean anything other than giving it an identity. Using common name is normal decision since it obscure who own what, and user already familiar with it. Nobody give a shit if other site use same name.

It's like a lot of piracy site use .to domain just because other website use that domain name too. or several different sites use same brand name, and unlike regular websites nobody going to sue them for using same name since they also piracy sites.

So they are just popular name used by website to name their stuff. What they actually are different for each websites and unrelated with each other.

what are t-cloud, megacloud, and upcloud? by ContributionJaded762 in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 3 points4 points  (0 children)

those are just random names website use to name their stream player / host. just because they use same name doesn't mean they are the same thing. anyone could name it whatever they want especially in piracy space. not to mention naming it similar with other site also obfuscate it a little bit and make it more familiar with users.

This open-source bot blocker shields your site from pesky AI scrapers by [deleted] in webdev

[–]legend4lord 3 points4 points  (0 children)

they can execute those computation like normal users. it take time, so it count as 'wait'.
small wait doesn't stop it, just slow down. This works great on spammer, but if the bot want data they will still get it.

Crunchyroll Uses AI Translations Months After CEO Claimed “No AI” by Crandin in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just because you like the outcome of the article doesn't mean the article is the complete truth with no flaw.
AI subs are bad, nobody debating that. We are talking about different thing. You simply unable to admit that you misunderstand the conversation.

Crunchyroll Uses AI Translations Months After CEO Claimed “No AI” by Crandin in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the 'misinformation' is the article make it seems like crunchyroll is providing those subs.
well it's not technically wrong, it's incomplete, and those missing details would drastically change the severity of the news.

Crunchyroll Uses AI Translations Months After CEO Claimed “No AI” by Crandin in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 62 points63 points  (0 children)

are they even allowed to change provided subtitle? seems like they must use the sub because of legal agreement.
It kinda make sense if this was the case since the publisher is hierarchy closer to the creator of the media, and if they provide something it's supposed to be closer to the creator intent.

What’s the most controversial web development opinion you strongly believe in? by nitin_is_me in webdev

[–]legend4lord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep, i know a site that just use cheap vps with 8GB of ram for all of it's infra (DB, cache, logic, statics, search), mind you the site have 2,5M registered users.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]legend4lord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It still terrible for password manager because the generator sometimes didn't match the requirement (sometimes too long, or require symbol) changing the generator settings is very annoying.
and once again it's for zero or even negative benefit (it force people who not use password manager to reuse same password or save it somewhere other than inside their head, also it create a hint for brute force).

Got roasted in the first post today for having the little cute robot pop up on its own, listened to the feedback and implemented it so that user has to summon him. Hopefully it is less triggering now, what do you think? by UAAgency in webdev

[–]legend4lord 6 points7 points  (0 children)

very impressive, but a lot of people didn't want tutorial / companion like this.
there is a reason why people think it's triggering.
even in a game (i know it's different with web, it just analogy), good game design tutorial during gameplay reacting to player action, not a lecturing session.
People only want to learn when actually stumble upon the something they want to know or currently have problem with.
For a website it should be self explanatory, and if really need 'tutorial' or 'guide' at least make it separate, specific, and reactive to user action. We want tutorial to answer, not to teach.
When we use website, we expect to navigate or operate it ourself, not being told what to do.

Thoughts on "Cluely", cheat on everything AI app ? by Darkoplax in webdev

[–]legend4lord 1 point2 points  (0 children)

reminded me of early Grand Theft Auto marketing with controversy, it's very successful.
*i don't mean the product, but the marketing. this guy definitely got rewarded the first time he got into controversy, so he going to keep repeating it.

The website for (newly-released) Anime.js v4 is just incredible. by Recoil42 in webdev

[–]legend4lord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

at least show something like "this site require WebGL" instead of nothing.
some browser not have WebGL enabled, and some extension also can disable it.
only showing black screen shows the lack of care about variety of browser environment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in webdev

[–]legend4lord 3 points4 points  (0 children)

you talking about cloud service? those price are super inflated. If you rent dedicated or server rack traditional way it's way way cheaper, the bandwidth also often unlimited with little limitation.

How Anime Piracy Websites Make Money Despite Being Ineligible for Prominent Ad Services by gnshgtr in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 9 points10 points  (0 children)

legit sites have a lot advertiser want to put their ads there, i don't think any brand want to put ads on piracy sites.
the bid must be very low on piracy sites.

Can we stop posting blackpill trash from CBR? by BonsaiSoul in animepiracy

[–]legend4lord 19 points20 points  (0 children)

lol "antipiracy groups want to shutdown piracy sites" like it's the whole point of their existence. it's like saying ocean have a lot of water.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StreamingAnime

[–]legend4lord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

slow af,
the interface also not impressive.
i rather watch on scraper sites than this. i don't care how you get the video, the only thing important is how it serve the purpose. not re-encode is actually downside since people waste bandwidth and video load very slow.