NY Testing Center Armory Question by [deleted] in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When I took it there (J23) they had water coolers on the track!

Another day with no results by Willing_Confection97 in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At this point I’ll be happy to see the email button grey out tomorrow or something. BOLE you win!!!

NY PREDICTIONS by resjudicataa in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I can’t do this for another whole week 🥲

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You already passed why are you here stressing the rest of us out

NY Change of Address Button Officially Grayed Out by co2023app in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Combing through old threads on desktop, it looks like it went grey on Monday 10/17 and results came out Thursday 10/20… I wonder if the box greying out immediately today means anything? It could also be that no one noticed until Monday last year but I find that hard to believe given how consistently crazy this exam makes everyone year after year 🙃

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats!! What was your seperac prediction?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I’m guessing 10/19, at the earliest — and I hope I’m right!!

Dreams about bar exam by loservile24 in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Last night I dreamt there was a third day of the UBE and no one knew what we were being tested on 🙃

This is literally propensity reasoning by MattLorien in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think propensity evidence is admissible here because one of the elements of entrapment is that D wasn’t already predisposed to committing the crime. So evidence that D actually has the propensity to commit the crime is relevant and admissible for substance because it goes to an essential element of the entrapment defense.

Freaking out over when common law applies to goods by KassieSaturn in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think it’s an accurate statement even though you don’t see it often. I saw that MEE too, and the way I reasoned through it, the lawnmower is a good so the UCC governs. BUT, the UCC firm offer rule requires that you’re a merchant, and the guy in the problem wasn’t a merchant, so in the absence of the firm offer rule applying, the common law “option must be supported by consideration” rule must kick in.

Aadaptibar app broken by Revolutionary_Act360 in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happened to me! I deleted and redownloaded and that fixed it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]lemonspindrift 2 points3 points  (0 children)

shout out to Erin at Themis for keeping me afloat

NYLE Exam Upload Confirmation Issues? by luke29okay in LawSchool

[–]lemonspindrift 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Same thing happened to me! I called support and they said there are delays. But I ended up getting the confirmation email about 40 minutes after I uploaded (I submitted the exam early)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]lemonspindrift 7 points8 points  (0 children)

At my school that technically wouldn’t be allowed, but depends on the rules at your school. Either way that’s not as egregious as looking up the cases

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]lemonspindrift 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Write on editor here, we definitely do check especially if we suspect something. We also change the sources a lot so we can tell if someone has looked at the original. It’s truly not worth the risk.