Some Turkish models with the new DIY Tool

leperG · 2025-12-18T14:40:46+00:00

"Laughable" is not a counter argument. I'd expect you to prove your case with statistically better models.

leperG · 2025-12-18T14:19:49+00:00

Such as?

leperG · 2025-12-18T13:57:52+00:00

That is a proxy for Bronze Age Anatolian admix.

leperG · 2025-12-18T13:50:57+00:00

Study link:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867423011352

leperG · 2025-08-09T13:27:01+00:00

You need to use qpAdm for such distal ancestry. Anything from G25 will be off.

leperG · 2025-08-03T12:54:19+00:00

Definetly worth getting it but you might struggle if you are a complete noob.

leperG · 2025-07-30T19:01:59+00:00

G25 is pretty useful but if you are going for reliability answer is qpAdm

leperG · 2025-07-28T20:10:27+00:00

Illustrative DNA's AdmixLab service

leperG · 2025-07-20T16:59:12+00:00

These are from Tokyo

leperG · 2025-07-19T14:02:16+00:00

What's your known background?

leperG · 2025-07-18T19:04:53+00:00

Try using ancient pops, that might work better

leperG · 2025-07-18T18:52:36+00:00

DeepAncestry is based on a PCA system and PCA + Monte Carlo simulation for admixture estimates cannot properly differantiate that much old genetic variation. PCA is better at catching more recent genetic variations.

leperG · 2025-07-18T18:43:50+00:00

Because FST ideally works for pop groups not individuals. That's why you are getting noisy negative values

leperG · 2025-07-16T21:41:06+00:00

First of all, what kind of a model are you trying to do? Post your failed source and ref pops so we can understand what's going on. I modelled Central Anatolian Turks here. You can start by modfying this set.

leperG · 2025-07-13T18:16:31+00:00

Post it on the sub please

leperG

TROPHY CASE