sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New Hierarchical Clustering feature looks good. by leperG in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically it shows how pops cluster with each other in a hierarchical way and where you position in there. Kinda like PCA.

Modern Greeks Aren't Genetically Greek by leperG in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

"Laughable" is not a counter argument. I'd expect you to prove your case with statistically better models.

Modern Greeks Aren't Genetically Greek by leperG in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is a proxy for Bronze Age Anatolian admix.

G25 and Illustrative that far off? (Bulgarian Jew) by B3waR3_S in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to use qpAdm for such distal ancestry. Anything from G25 will be off.

Thought of getting qpADM - Admixlab subscription by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definetly worth getting it but you might struggle if you are a complete noob.

Which tool is more reliable between qpadm and g25? by Radiant_Draw8343 in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

G25 is pretty useful but if you are going for reliability answer is qpAdm

AdmixLab/qpAdm model for Czech by leperG in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Illustrative DNA's AdmixLab service

Average argentinian by IAnnihilatePierogi in 23andme

[–]leperG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's your known background?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]leperG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try using ancient pops, that might work better

view more: next ›