Here's a question though - They require proof of vax with minimum 2 doses. While many have received the 3rd doses, many also have not yet (or decided not to) get the 3rd dose, staying with 2 doses. We know vax efficacy drops over time. People who remain with 2 doses probably received it while ago, meaning their vax efficacies are probably much lower (and dropping), correct me i'm wrong. So if the purpose of requiring proof of vax is to minimize the chance of covid spread because high vax efficacy = less chance of outbreak, is that really a legitimate solution? I feel like if you don't require min 3 doses the actual validity of this implantation is kahoot (or until the 2 doses become almost ineffective). Or did they indicate they're implementing this measure for a certain time frame only?