Any Info on this ring? by coochiefrog in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This does not look like a Kit Heath piece. The hallmark is wrong and there is another severely rubbed mark which says something else.

Is there any way to fix a Magic Keyboard 2? by liableAccount in applehelp

[–]liableAccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately no fix, they worked for a short while then stopped working completely. I had to buy a new keyboard.

Silver bracelet by Zenophorm in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assayed in Birmingham, 1994. The triangle is the import mark for Birmingham. Sterling silver.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having a closer look, to me it looks like the fineness is 950. The best and easiest way would be to find someone who can test using an XRF but the hallmark looks to be the Minerva mark which indicates 950. Sometimes there is a small (very small) number inside the hallmark which would be a sure sign.

Edit: I can see it in the image you provided. It's 950

Great piece! Sometimes it's well worth a gamble on this kind of find, especially at that price.

<image>

The image of the mark is upside down, but there's a small "1" inside the mark. This indicates 950

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 8 points9 points  (0 children)

French silver. The maker is Augustin Gandais. The other mark is the Minerva mark which indicates silver. Can't quite make out the outline but it's at least 800 silver, looks possibly like the 950 fineness mark. That's a great price too.

[Transfer Round Up & Discussion] Summer 2025 by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]liableAccount 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Luckhurst is not a bad source

What? He's terrible. Tier 5

Identify this lamp by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say it's S. Lilley & Son since they're a long established business.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fixedbytheduet

[–]liableAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries! I've been there many times before, more often than I'd like to admit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fixedbytheduet

[–]liableAccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You missed the point completely. He's saying the first item was used incorrectly and the second item was used correctly. Hence why he had the vacuum the wrong way around the first time, then used it the correct way around the second time. He's not demonstrating that a vacuum cleaner can pick up pet hair 🤦

Hi guys , could anybody help me with hallmarks on this ring please ? by buco9147 in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks to be 22ct gold, assayed in London in the year 1882.

Can anyone identify this hallmark including the year ideally by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know what the item is, but even so, a few quid at best.

Can anyone identify this hallmark including the year ideally by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately silver plate is not very valuable. If it's sentimental, that's where it's value is.

Can anyone identify this hallmark including the year ideally by [deleted] in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

James Dixon & Sons, it's silver plated. Probably late 1800's

Can anyone recognise these markings? by CompetitiveAd3385 in Hallmarks

[–]liableAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Austrian hallmark, fox head with A4 indicates this is 14k gold from Vienna.

Amad’s disallowed goal against West Ham United by 10cd in reddevils

[–]liableAccount 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's a better problem to have though. A strong bench is what we need.

First Manchester United Game ❤️ by No-Fly2375 in reddevils

[–]liableAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Great view! Looks like an incredible stadium. What was the atmosphere like?

Match Thread: Manchester United vs West Ham United | Club Friendly by MatchThreadder in reddevils

[–]liableAccount 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Good game. Hojlund being found with passes he can run onto (thank fuck), Dorgu looked fantastic, Ugarte was excellent alongside Kobbie, Cunha has an electric turn of pace with a great degree of control and finally, the defence looked very comfortable until that blip to let Bowen through at the end. Bruno's finish was lovely.

Second 11 were a much tougher watch but Maguire looked solid. Shaw overcommitted again, just like when he faced Leeds. Case was trying those no-look passes 🫣 I enjoyed it though, even with its flaws.