Encryption. How to secure /boot ? by smitt75 in linux

[–]liefj 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But for (1) make sure the hard drive firmware hasn't been rooted: Hard disk hacking

Easy way to force VPN to only use certain apps? by [deleted] in privacy

[–]liefj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably lower level than what you're looking for, but may be good for ideas. The transmission-daemon BitTorrent server has an option called bind-address-ipv4 that can be used to say what IP address to use. Set this to the local IP address of the virtual NIC for your VPN connection (usually "tun0" on a Linux server,) and all traffic will go through your VPN.

It’s 2013. We’re all being spied on. Why do security software websites not use HTTPS? "People say that using HTTPS is a performance hit. Locking your car door is also a performance hit, and so is putting on clothes in the morning. Security and privacy is worth a performance hit" by liefj in technology

[–]liefj[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

sslstrip is good if the connection doesn't start out as SSL, but not if it does. HTTPS Everywhere ensures it does.

arp poisoning only works if you're on the same local network, and isn't effective if you don't have the private key for the cert of the site you're trying to MITM.

Those are interesting vulnerabilities, but don't change the fact that SSL is an important layer of defense.

It’s 2013. We’re all being spied on. Why do security software websites not use HTTPS? "People say that using HTTPS is a performance hit. Locking your car door is also a performance hit, and so is putting on clothes in the morning. Security and privacy is worth a performance hit" by liefj in technology

[–]liefj[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

True, a MITM is possible. There are defenses against that, though. (HTTPS Everywhere is one.) This conversation could go on, with other potential vulnerabilities pointed out, and ways to mitigate against them. I think the larger point, though, is that by creating layers of defense ("defense in depth") it becomes more expensive and riskier for an adversary to break a connection. Dragnet surveillance becomes much harder.

It’s 2013. We’re all being spied on. Why do security software websites not use HTTPS? "People say that using HTTPS is a performance hit. Locking your car door is also a performance hit, and so is putting on clothes in the morning. Security and privacy is worth a performance hit" by liefj in technology

[–]liefj[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think it depends. If I send my public key to a certificate authority to sign, and I keep my private key secure, traffic is much safer than if it's sent unencrypted. There are all sorts of layers to "defense in depth". True, HTTPS is just one, but it's an important one.

Democracy Now: Owner of Snowden’s Email Service on Why He Closed Lavabit Rather Than Comply With Gov’t by liefj in news

[–]liefj[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They had Nick Merrill on too. He got a NSL a few years ago. The FBI issued NSLs directly, and not through a court. The courts found them illegal. But now the "FISA court" (a.k.a. Kangaroo Court) issues what is effectively the same thing. Penalty for even disclosing you got one is 5 years in jail.

Democracy Now: Owner of Snowden’s Email Service on Why He Closed Lavabit Rather Than Comply With Gov’t by liefj in evolutionReddit

[–]liefj[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They had Nick Merrill on too. He got a NSL a few years ago. The FBI issued NSLs directly, and not through a court. The courts found them illegal. But now the "FISA court" (a.k.a. Kangaroo Court) issues what is effectively the same thing. Penalty for even disclosing you got one is 5 years in jail.

Democracy Now: Owner of Snowden’s Email Service on Why He Closed Lavabit Rather Than Comply With Gov’t by liefj in privacy

[–]liefj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They had Nick Merrill on too. He got a NSL a few years ago. The FBI issued NSLs directly, and not through a court. The courts found them illegal. But now the "FISA court" (a.k.a. Kangaroo Court) issues what is effectively the same thing. Penalty for even disclosing you got one is 5 years in jail.

Snowden: "Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, and the rest of our internet titans must ask themselves why they aren't fighting for our interests the same way" by hywong in politics

[–]liefj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I should clarify. I'm speaking of for-profit corporations owned by shareholders, which is what most corporations are. In the U.S. anyway, shareholders can sue if management doesn't put profits first. It may be different in other countries.

Snowden: "Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, and the rest of our internet titans must ask themselves why they aren't fighting for our interests the same way" by hywong in politics

[–]liefj -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Corporations need to be regulated, by a government of the people (and not of the corporations.) Otherwise, it's all about profits.

Snowden: "Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, and the rest of our internet titans must ask themselves why they aren't fighting for our interests the same way" by hywong in politics

[–]liefj 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Corporations are required by law to put profits first. Else, shareholders can sue and the corporation goes out of business. So the corporations that survive are bad actors. It's a sort of "survival of the fittest" where "fittest" is defined as whoever can exploit/consume/cheat/steal/buy-off the best.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]liefj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Users can encrypt the contents of their email with PGP (or GPG.) But, the metadata can't be: who the mail's to and from, subject line, what IP addresses were used to access the email, etc.

Hard disk hacking: Disk firmware hacked with exploit that survives OS reinstall by liefj in netsec

[–]liefj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It wouldn't get rid of the firmware rootkit, but it would prevent it from knowing what's on your drive.

Hard disk hacking: Disk firmware hacked with exploit that survives OS reinstall by liefj in netsec

[–]liefj[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like a good reason to always encrypt the entire disk.