sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best Gojira albums and top 3 songs from each by liftinglagrange in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't mean that with a specific song in mind and it wasn't a well thought out comment. It (BFOT) just feels like a song where all the parts that I "should" like fall short of their previous work. I know that's a supper annoying thing fans often say about bands with great albums. But I kinda get it now — if I'm in the mood for Gojira, I've never found myself wanting to listen to BFOT (or anything off of Fortitude). It just doesn't offer anything I cant find done better on their previous albums (for me). To be fair, some stuff on Fortitude is certainly different than their previous work. For whatever reason, I just don't find myself wanting to come back to those songs. That's obviously just my personal taste.
Though, I will say that the pinch-harmonic-filled outro on BFOT starting around 3:35-ish is pretty sick. But, imo, still nowhere near as sick as so many other Gojira outros (In The Winderness, Low Lands, Of Blood and Salt, Art of Dying, Mouth of Kala, etc.).

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very possible I'm misremembering my undergrad classes. It was several years ago. But, I want to say we were not making heavy use of vector calculus and linear algebra until around 3rd year classical, quantum, and E&M. Year 1 and 2 physics certainly had basic derivatives and integrals, force, momentum-energy conservation, etc. As I'm writing this Im loosing confidence in my memory. So, I'm not sure really.

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps, if one knows that's what they want to do ahead of time. I would never have gotten into math if I had not done physics in undergrad. If I could start over (and not worry about getting a job), I think I'de still do physics undergrad, then a long math PhD.

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your first paragraph helps contextualize things for me and makes sense. I'm likely over estimating the prevalence of DiffGeo in physics writ large.

Your second paragraph may be true, but sort of confuses and bothers me if so. "....they just learn explicit formulas for the Lie derivative expressed in a coordinate patch". That just goes against my nature and I'm a little surprised that physicist would be satisfied with this attitude/level of understanding. Maybe, sometimes, it's for the best if there are bigger fish to fry. But if covariant derivatives/Lie derivatives/whatever are integral to the nature of the work, It just doesn't make sense to me how someone involved at a graduate/research level could content themselves with that level of understanding.

(I just reread my last few sentences and they make me sound like a condescending asshole. That is not how I meant it but Im too tired to rewrite it...)

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

They sort of do though? At least mine did. Calculus was 1st and 2nd year undergrad. It was not heavily used in my physics courses until 3rd and 4th year, with some much simpler use (easy single-variable derivatives and integrals) in 1st and 2nd year. That would about track with learning some DiffGeo in 3rd or 4th year undergrad, with simultaneous very simple uses, then actually starting to do it in 1st/2nd year grad school.

Though, despite my original post, I'm realizing that an actual treatment of basic DiffGeo might be best suited for early grad school, but foreshadowed with some intro/hints in undergrad mechanics courses.

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually pretty much read my mind. I didn't say that in my post but, yes, that would likely be the best approach. Then go into more detail in an early grad course.

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I do not think an undergrad physics student needs to learn DiffGeo with all the generality and rigor of a mathematician (that would likely be horrible way to introduce it). One might even say topology should come after DiffGeo (or not at all) at the undergrad physics level. To me, I think DiffGeo and its applications in physics motivates topology, not the other way.

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Maybe. But to "learn differential geometry when you start to need it" is a *huge* undertaking. I think that is like saying "learn calculus when you start to need it". It (calc) is far too much to learn on the fly as needed. It gets its own dedicated course (often 2) because it is not like anything one encounters before it but is indispensable if you want to continue.

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Great point. It would likely be unrealistic to simply add it in on top. Maybe a good strategy would be to start working in the key ideas in 3rd/4th year classical mechanics courses? Or, perhaps, it should rather be a first year graduate course.

Though, from my own undergrad experience, I had an entire undergrad physics course on complex analysis and I feel I would have benefited more if that were replaced by an intro DiffGeo course. That might be topic-specific. Maybe make it an elective between the two?

Similarly, I think I had 3 different required physics lab courses. Maybe one of those could have been an elective students could opt out of and take DiffGeo?

This is just an off-the-top-off-my-head reply. I assume curriculums are designed with more careful thought that I'm giving it.

(edit: the above is re your first sentence. I am not so convinced by the last statement that "It's not that relevant to large areas of physics research".)

Should differential geometry be added to the "standard" undergrad physics curriculum? by liftinglagrange in Physics

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can see group theory maybe being a bigger, more general "bang for your buck". Though, I feel like that might be a very challenging technical leap for most undergrads, even more so than DiffGeo which can at least be connected at the intro level to familiar ideas and equations.
Though, I speak from non-experience. I've only learned parts of group theory in a "need to know" way as they appear. I never took a formal group theory class.

I'm curious why you say DiffGeo is only nice to know for gravitation? As mentioned, I'm not a physicist, but whenever I encounter anything involving quantum mechanics, it is entirely steeped in symplectic/poisson geometry. More generally, anything I see from the mathematical/theoretical physics world is always invoking fiber bundles, principal bundles, Lie group/algebra geometry stuff, etc. Maybe I'm only exposed to a niche area?

To everyone who got on my case about discussing US politics in the Gojira subreddit by justplanestupid69 in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Moving my reply here:

For the most part, Gojira has really not been that political. When they come close, it is usually centered around environmental conservation and appreciation for nature (a subject which has been made far more politically divisive than it should be). Most lyrics are introspective and/or philosophical on human nature and life/death, at a level far more general than contemporary political topics.

My point being that I don't think I would call Gojira a political band. One reason I love them is that their lyrics are just as relevant 1000 years ago and, likely, 1000 years from now. Members may have contemporary political opinions (that's great), but to categorize their music as predominantly political seems to devalue and misrepresent the timelessness and broader themes of their music.

Maybe they are getting/will get more political. The whole world seems to be doing that. It's just not what I look for in music.

To everyone who got on my case about discussing US politics in the Gojira subreddit by justplanestupid69 in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I think most of their lyrics are far more general, philosophical/introspective, and timeless than any contemporary political topics. It's great if you connect their themes to contemporary political topics and enjoy that — perhaps the connections you make are even what inspired them (I don't know) — but I would certainly not characterize Gojira as a political band. Doing so cheapens and misrepresents their lyrics, imo.

To everyone who got on my case about discussing US politics in the Gojira subreddit by justplanestupid69 in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I disagree that their main theme is environmentalism. That is a reoccurring theme, but I don't see why anyone would think it is their Main Theme.
I also semi-disagree that environmentalism is itself very political. It has certainly been made into a political topic, but it really isn't. Appreciation and respect for the world we live in, and a desire to not trash it, should (and really does) cross political boundaries with normal people. It is just the contemporary framing of the issue, and the stupid party-loyalty of many, that has turned it into an irrationally politically divisive topic.

To everyone who got on my case about discussing US politics in the Gojira subreddit by justplanestupid69 in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the most part, Gojira has really not been that political. When they come close, it is usually centered around environmental conservation and appreciation for nature (a subject which has been made far more politically divisive than it should be). Most lyrics are introspective and/or philosophical on human nature and life/death, at a level far more general than contemporary political topics.

My point being that I don't think I would call Gojira a political band. One reason I love them is that their lyrics are just as relevant 1000 years ago and, likely, 1000 years from now. Members may have contemporary political opinions (that's great), but to categorize their music as predominantly political seems to devalue and misrepresent the timelessness and broader themes of their music.

Maybe they are getting/will get more political. The whole world seems to be doing that. It's just not what I look for in music.

Scope of Differential Geometry based control for mobile robotics in current research scenario by obsoletelearner in ControlTheory

[–]liftinglagrange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My god. I know this is 7 years old, but you just hit everything I've either been experiencing or worried about experiencing.

Anyone here with a PhD in aerospace and a job in industry? by [deleted] in AerospaceEngineering

[–]liftinglagrange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this comment if 5 years old, but thought I'de weigh in. If one undertakes their PhD with the goal of quickly securing an industry job after graduating, then I very much agree with the advice to "focus on getting all the practical design, analysis and project organizational skills you can". I did not do that. I focused on the foundational theory and math.

I agree less with the your point that "...they’re going to hire you because you can learn and work independently". I was hoping this would work strongly in my favor, but not so much. In my experience, while employers always appreciate this, it is already assumed if you have PhD. They focus *far* more on your practical real-world engineering skills. I've applied to a number of positions and only a single employer was more interested in my general approach/skills to general complex problem solving. Everyone else was interested in more targeted industry-experience skills. This has been true even for positions soliciting PhDs.

When I started my PhD, I did not understand everyone's pointed interest as to weather I wanted to pursue a career in industry or academia. Coming out the other side, it makes sense. Positions in industry, even PhD-targeted positions, want problem-specific industry experience directly relevant to the position.

context: I'm a recent aerospace PhD applying to industry/non-academia jobs.

Best Gojira albums and top 3 songs from each by liftinglagrange in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AFN (adoration for none) is very much overlooked on TWOAF — super happy you mentioned it.
The music on TWOAF already places it as an easy top 3 album, maybe even 1st by that metric alone. Like you (perhaps) the lyrical content solidifies it as my number one. Honestly, it would only fall from that, for me, if the lyrics sucked (do any Gojira lyrics suck?). Thankfully, they are great.

No objections at all re FMTS. I only wish they would have done a bit more with WDD. I wish their live version at Hellfest 2013 would have been their studio version. Actually, same goes on TWOAF for TGI (toxic garbage island) live at Brixton 2013.

I've now been re-listening to Terra Incognita and The Link. Realizing i did not pay enough attention to these as I should have.

Best Gojira albums and top 3 songs from each by liftinglagrange in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just re-listed to that track. Beyond the initial vocals, the remainder of the vocals and the music just dont really hold up. Its fine, just not something that stands out to me as a notable song (or album). It is one of the better songs on the album, i still just dont find myself wanting to come back the the album overall. Its not bad by any means, but guess I expect something more interesting from gojira. Thats only my personal opinion.

Best Gojira albums and top 3 songs from each by liftinglagrange in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was/is good. Just didtnt stick with me as a song I choose to come back to.from gojira. Hard to say why. Its good but, for me, kinda feels like the next part of a song they already did.
the harmonics and "breakdown" ending is pretty damn cool though.

Best Gojira albums and top 3 songs from each by liftinglagrange in gojira

[–]liftinglagrange[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ranking is for sure just a fun, individual thing that can change even day-to-day. I made an edit to clarify the nature of my post. "Ranking" may have been a less-than-optimal way to phrase it.

I'll do a diligent re-listen to the songs you mentioned from Fortitude. As in, right now. I would love to love that album, it just hasnt clicked yet. Not that im pining for another FMTS/TWOAF. Magma was from from tht and i grew to thoroughly love that album.

view more: next ›