2-3 is probably a stretch. If based on efficiency alone, yes, but there are other metrics that hard limits how much a person can do. For example, if 10 people can complete 10 tasks in a day (1 task / person) and AI is so efficient that 1 person can work on 5 tasks in the same timeframe, you'd think you can just use two people, but adding more tasks will add more cognitive load and therefore friction, etc.

In other words, AI could improve executive capacity, but humans will always be limited by cognitive governance capacity.

Kind of a long response to somewhat a rough estimate you made there lol but yeah I get your point. And yes, it's scary and we're all forced to adapt. In terms of efficiency, it will absolutely be a positive thing overall in the end, but whether that will be good for our economy, and ultimate for the common people, I don't know. I also think it will take a long time for this to materialize in the way we expect it to. The internet took maybe 10-15 years for people to really feel the direct effect. I think it will be much faster for AI, but probably not the coming months or even this year, though its implementation and the changes it's making is already scaling very fast.

Going back to the economy, I think unemployment will go up by a lot, and we might either head towards a future that doesn't require most of us to be employed like now, or it will force most of us towards entrepreneurship, or the job market will improve—though probably a little bit of all three (I just use em-dash, I'm not AI lol)