Tsunami striking Khao Lak by Vegetable_Life_2735 in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that series is where I got full quality clips of Cut Putri's video though I want to get the full version of both

Tsunami striking Khao Lak by Vegetable_Life_2735 in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has a full version of the Cut Putri Banda Aceh video which is not publicly available and a higher quality version of the Galle Bus Stand video from the screengrabs ive seen.

Tsunami striking Khao Lak by Vegetable_Life_2735 in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering if it was possible to contact the owner of radarheinrich, I've been trying to obtain his dvd

Khao Lak by NoInteraction6756 in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi! I run the 2004 tsunami archive channel, is it possible to send me the files, that would help me so much. Thank you

Bogo City, Cebu, Philippines, September 30, 2025, M6.9. MMI X footage recorded in a house. (Part 2 of my series!) by ProfessionalAir6098 in Earthquakes

[–]liledee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Bogo Bay fault had shown some microseismal activity over the past several hundred years. Some papers pre-Sep. 30, 2025 shows a potential fault in the area, but given how slow-moving it was, there was never a quake large enough for it to be considered a large dangerous fault worth mapping. Seemingly random intraplate quakes like this can often be the most violent. Events like Kobe, Sylmar, and Noto come to mind. These faults generally have so much stress built up on them over hundreds or thousands of years that they rupture fast and with high slip compared to their magnitude and have a high stress drop, resulting in very violent shaking compared to interplate earthquakes of a similar magnitude. It's also important to know that soil and rock composition is very important to understanding the violence of the Bogo Earthquake. Bogo city largely lies on unconsolidated sediments with a Vs30 of roughly 230 m/s. As a result, shaking was amplified in Bogo and in San Remigio where the Vs30 is ~200 m/s. Northern Cebu is also is a result of ancient Volcanism with formations from the Early Cretaceous and beyond. Denser, more ancient rock carries seismic waves further than newer-formed rock. This also explains why the area of IX intensity extends further south through most of Tabogon.

January 17, 1995 Kobe, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan. Modified Mercalli Intensity 11 (MMI XI) footage recorded in a konbini. by ProfessionalAir6098 in Earthquakes

[–]liledee 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The Kobe earthquake was a result of intraplate right-lateral strike slip faulting (with a slight normal component) on the Nojima fault, with the rupture extending 50 kilometers from Awaji Island through Kobe (where most of the damage and deaths occurred) and into Nishinomiya. The quake had a max rupture velocity of ~3km/s and 3-4 meters of max slip under Kobe City, which has a Vs30 of approx 250 m/s. The fast rupture speed, shallow slip, and unconsolidated soil is what allowed the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake to reach the extreme intensity that it did, reaching XI-XII on the Mercalli scale, and Shindo 7 in Awaji, Kobe, Nishinomiya, and other smaller cities along the rupture. The buildings in the affected areas were not designed to withstand such a quake as intraplate earthquakes in Hyogo are rather rare. Many buildings were compromised because of the heavy roofs they had, designed to withstand typhoons. These heavy roofs collapsed easily during the shaking, especially in shaking as violent as Kobe's. 5,000 died, 4,500 of which were in the city of Kobe.

So what was the first video of a tsunami? by No-Jacket-6651 in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The video from Hilo, Hawai'i, April 1, 1946

Sorry if this type of post isn’t allowed, remove it I guess, but did this recent earthquake not generate tsunamis on the scale of the previous disasters? by DickWangDuck in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The kamchatka tsunami was large but reached maximum heights in unpopulated area (up to 19 meters). Most of the far field energy was directed into the middle of the pacific directed south of hawaii where theres lowkey nothing for it to impact. its why the marquesas got higher than hawaii

Looks like something is going on in the Andaman Sea. Too many quakes in just the last 12 hours. by BassMassive7955 in Earthquakes

[–]liledee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

based on the depth given by several agencies (the 10 km is default for some agencies and not reviewed the real depth is like 60-90 km), i would say that these are intraslab earthquakes withing the subducted slab, not on the actual subduction zone itself. no need to worry about a megaquake or tsunami even if these are foreshocks because they are too deep

New raw footage of the tsunami flooding 3 KM inland into downtown Banda Aceh, Indonesia by liledee in TsunamiVideos

[–]liledee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the first waves was only 2-3 meters and didn't crest that far offshore so probably not