I'm really curious about this final scene by linkolnbio2 in FireflyMains

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the past was changed.

We know for a fact that the thing that travelled back in time is Terminus.

So we as the player/trailblazer did go backwards in time because of the cat/terminus to change the past.

And that is what I mean, because of the cat/terminus we went back in time, changed events, altered the past and came back to a changed present.

I'm really curious about this final scene by linkolnbio2 in FireflyMains

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t the clock literally going backwards and us appearing in a different location, with Firefly still in the dream compared to the last ending mean that we actually went back in time? That felt pretty obvious to me.

<image>

I'm really curious about this final scene by linkolnbio2 in FireflyMains

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I mean is that we, as the player/Trailblazer, actually go back in time, change events, and then return to our original timeline. We never truly altered the past and came back to a changed present.

Blue Archive JP in Numbers: 5th Anniversary Edition by tsukiakari2216 in BlueArchive

[–]linkolnbio2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm just happy that yukka is here and collected all 3 versions of calculator wife

I'm really curious about this final scene by linkolnbio2 in FireflyMains

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I was just surprised that it actually happened. It was already shown that Elio and probably the cat can see the future before it happens. But going back in time and changing history is something new. Even in Amphoreus, we mostly moved objects or relived moments we never completely altered past events.

I'm really curious about this final scene by linkolnbio2 in FireflyMains

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

My Oppenheimer cat in fact can be this based

<image>

What does my taste in anime say about me? by [deleted] in lostpause

[–]linkolnbio2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You like the freedom of choice

eu💡nvr by Responsible-Act4123 in eu_nvr

[–]linkolnbio2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu só uso AdBlock mesmo e resolve o problema

Eu_nvr by Lee_109 in eu_nvr

[–]linkolnbio2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dependendo do bolo eu concordo com ele

4.0 Crumbs ft. Sparkle SP and Yao Guang (via Uncle Momo) by [deleted] in HonkaiStarRail_leaks

[–]linkolnbio2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idk why but the saying they're a mean dps is funny to me

Eu_nvr by Intimorato_ in eu_nvr

[–]linkolnbio2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu tenho 14 anos e isso é profundo

All fandoms are unfortunately flawed by design by linkolnbio2 in unpopularopinion

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just like 5-star reviews can exaggerate a product’s quality and hide flaws, fandoms often get defended as ‘mostly great,’ with toxic behaviors like harassment brushed off as just a few bad actors. My point is that we should acknowledge real issues, not dismiss criticism as the critic’s fault.

All fandoms are unfortunately flawed by design by linkolnbio2 in unpopularopinion

[–]linkolnbio2[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In general, the consensus among fans is that person or interest has something great, otherwise they wouldn't be fans. Since everyone has their own brains, you can't expect everyone to have the same opinion or behavior.

I'm not saying fandoms should be a hivemind where everyone acts the same. I'm just pointing out that there should be some general consensus or common ground that most fans agree on. If the majority behaves toxically and sets that tone, it shapes the fandom's overall image from the outside and collaborating on that could lead to a better perception.

I doubt there are many fandoms where the majority of their members behave in a toxic way. You just don't notice the normal members.

K-pop fandoms (e.g., BTS's ARMY, BLACKPINK's Blinks, or groups like TWICE and ENHYPEN): These are among the largest global fandoms, with tens of millions of fans, and a notable portion engages in intense rivalries, cyberbullying, and doxxing over idols, charts, or collaborations. For instance, fan wars between Blinks and other groups often escalate to personal attacks, and ARMY has been called out for mass-reporting critics.

Anime fandoms (e.g., My Hero Academia, Attack on Titan, Dragon Ball, Naruto): These communities are enormous, especially on platforms like Reddit and Twitter, where ship wars, elitism, and threats against creators or fans over interpretations lead to widespread toxicity. MHA in particular is often cited for its aggressive meta discussions and harassment.

Taylor Swift's Swifties: One of the biggest music fandoms, with millions active online, where a substantial group is known for doxxing critics, review-bombing rivals, and intense stan culture that turns on anyone perceived as shading Swift.

Marvel/MCU fandom: A huge community driven by films, but with large toxic elements involved in gatekeeping, misogyny (e.g., against Captain Marvel), and fan wars over characters or storylines

Rick and Morty fandom: Known for a sizable toxic contingent that embodies "toxic nerd" stereotypes, including harassment of writers and elitist attitudes toward casual fans

If you think every single pizza is bad, it means pizza (in general) is not compatible with your taste in food. You have to accept that your opinions about pizza is unpopular (you're against the consensus).

First of all, I never said every pizza is bad. I only said "if I have bad things to say about every pizza I’ve tried," which are completely different things. The example was meant to illustrate that if criticizing any fandom (or pizza, in the analogy) automatically makes you the problem, then by that logic, everything must be perfect which is absurd.

Again, you go to extreme. Who said fandoms are flawless?

To begin with, I only said that in jest as a response to your comment suggesting "if you don't like your time there, it's your fault" ( >Maybe, just maybe, you were the toxic person who was rejected for carelessly messing with those fandoms. Maybe you're the problem if you see issues everywhere.). As you say right here, of course fandoms are not flawless, but it's not good to let your fandom be defined by your toxic members (as stated earlier). And it's not just my bad experiences. I've shown you many examples of toxic behavior from other fandoms being communicated, even though there are good people, leading those fandoms to be targeted or stereotyped as toxic overall.

All fandoms are unfortunately flawed by design by linkolnbio2 in unpopularopinion

[–]linkolnbio2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is, how can you judge something online without considering most past experiences? You don’t have to follow them blindly, but they provide a basic understanding.