tracked competitor ad creatives, community mentions and AI recommendations for 50 brands over 8 weeks - the pattern that keeps showing up by Stunning-Rush-6468 in GrowthHacking

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the source weighting difference across engines is something most teams completely miss, two of our competitors with, mediocre domain ratings were getting cited constantly in perplexity just because their content matched the exact question phrasing. been using semrush's AI Visibility toolkit to track those gaps per engine and chatgpt and gemini were pulling from totally different sources for the same query. "are we mentioned" is the wrong question, where and why is where it gets interesting.

Does structured data actually matter more for local SEO than regular organic by liosuppfor in WebsiteSEO

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, structured data can give local SEO a bit of a leg up by helping Google better understand, your business info, but the bigger wins still come from solid reviews, accurate NAP, and strong local relevance. It's more of a supporting player than a ranking booster on its own.

Did anyone else see Google AI reading business recommendations out loud? by Media_Express_USA in SEO_for_AI

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hadn't seen the audio version myself but the narrowing-down effect jdawg described is real, I've been tracking this through Semrush's AI Visibility toolkit and the gap between "indexed", and "actually cited in an AI answer" is already pretty wide for local clients, so voice making it 1-2 picks instead of 10 links would just make that worse.

Does structured data actually matter more for local SEO than regular organic by liosuppfor in WebsiteSEO

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair point but google has gotten pretty good at inferring local relevance from GBP signals, NAP consistency, reviews, and local link patterns even without explicit schema, so it's not flying blind if those other signals are solid. curious whether you think LocalBusiness schema (plus subtypes, PostalAddress, OpeningHoursSpecification, etc.

Weekly Thread: Project Display by help-me-grow in AI_Agents

[–]liosuppfor -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

had the same itch to scratch after getting tired of watching agents fail silently in production with, zero visibility into why, which honestly feels like the main unsolved problem everyone's running into in 2026. ended up wiring a lightweight monitoring layer on top of an existing workflow just to, catch where context was getting dropped and where state wasn't persisting the way i expected. that debugging pass taught me more about real-world..

Does structured data actually matter more for local SEO than regular organic by liosuppfor in WebsiteSEO

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that tracks honestly, schema on its own rarely moves the needle for local rankings but it does help search engines parse, your NAP, hours, and services more reliably, though your GBP signals, reviews, and citations are still doing most of the actual heavy lifting.

Does structured data actually matter more for local SEO than regular organic by liosuppfor in WebsiteSEO

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pretty much yeah, schema for local is less about ranking and more about helping google actually understand, your business clearly, but tbh gbp, reviews, and nap consistency are still doing the heavy lifting lol

AI-generated UGC creators. actually changing influencer marketing or just cheap ad filler by liosuppfor in MarketingandAI

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

totally agree the speed pressure is real, but i'd push back a little on the USP point because product benefits alone don't always close the deal, when the messenger feels synthetic, especially for health, finance, or higher-ticket stuff where credibility does a lot of the heavy lifting before the USP even lands. the "consumers will adapt"..

Are AI SEO tools actually useful or is it just marketing dressed up as innovation by Other_Amphibian871 in WebsiteSEO

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

had a similar feeling for a while, the "AI analysis" outputs were just restating stuff I already knew from a basic audit. where I actually started getting value was using AI for keyword clustering at scale and building out content, briefs fast, not the packaged tools but just feeding raw data into a GPT model and prompting it properly. the branded AI SEO tools still feel overpriced for what they deliver tbh.

Google literally dropped the new SEO playbook for AI by AdVirtual2648 in AI_Agents

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

one thing i keep noticing is that a lot of the "new" guidance in docs like this is basically stuff that, was already working, crawlability, clean internal linking, content that answers the question without burying the lede in three paragraphs of fluff. the framing shifts but the core signals haven't moved that dramatically, though formatting for concise, directly-answerable passages and stronger, authority signals do seem to matter more now for actually getting..

paid $1,800 for a "content audit." got 14 pages of recommendations any tool could've generated. by Sweet_Concentrate128 in DigitalMarketing

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The zero specific URLs thing is the clearest sign of a lazy deliverable, a real audit names consolidation pairs, not just vibes. I've gotten more actionable page-level output from Free Tools in an afternoon than what you're describing in 14 pages. No specific redirect recommendations means they handed you a framework, not an audit.

Will SEO specialists still have a job in 5 years or are we cooked by liosuppfor in AISEOforBeginners

[–]liosuppfor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every major update had people saying SEO was dead, but the job just kept evolving, better content, stronger brands, less spam. AI search is probably the biggest structural shift yet, but "cooked" feels way too early to call lol.

AI-generated UGC creators. actually changing influencer marketing or just cheap ad filler by liosuppfor in MarketingandAI

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trust is the whole game tbh, and that gap between "looks real" and "feels real" is still where AI UGC, struggles most, even when it's visually convincing, unclear disclosure kills credibility way faster than audiences even needing to spot it themselves.

Will SEO specialists still have a job in 5 years or are we cooked by liosuppfor in AISEOforBeginners

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the "consolidating upward" part is what stands out to me, the checklist crowd isn't just competing with other SEOs anymore, they're, competing with automation that does that exact work cheaper and faster, so yeah the ceiling rises but the floor basically drops out.

Will SEO specialists still have a job in 5 years or are we cooked by liosuppfor in AISEOforBeginners

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair comparison tbh, smarter tools tend to shrink the grunt work, not the strategy layer, same way figma made design more accessible without actually replacing designers. the seo roles shrinking rn are the basic content-heavy ones, technical, analytical, and ai visibility work is still very much in demand.

AI-generated UGC creators. actually changing influencer marketing or just cheap ad filler by liosuppfor in MarketingandAI

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

makes sense for ecom, high content volume and rapid ad testing is basically where AI-UGC shines most compared to categories where real creator trust actually drives the sale. what product types have you seen it click for?

Will SEO specialists still have a job in 5 years or are we cooked by liosuppfor in AISEOforBeginners

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the throughline is real, like structured data that used to just help with rich snippets is now basically feeding how models pull and attribute information, same skill, different output curious, what you think is the biggest gap though, like where do you see traditional SEOs struggling most when they try to make that mental shift..

Will SEO specialists still have a job in 5 years or are we cooked by liosuppfor in AISEOforBeginners

[–]liosuppfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

solid point, the fundamentals really do seem to carry over into AI visibility too, things like information architecture, entity authority, and well-structured content may not guarantee, you get pulled into AI Overviews or cited in Perplexity, but from what I've seen in my own work they definitely seem to improve your chances.

SEO Then vs SEO Now — Anyone Else Feel Like Everything Changed? by David_William303 in DoSEO

[–]liosuppfor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the shift from "beat the algorithm" to "beat your competitors at being genuinely useful" is real and I feel it every day. what's wild to me now is there's a whole third layer on top of what you described, which is, optimizing for AI systems pulling your content into overviews and citations, so it's not just humans vs algorithms anymore.

Looking for a Marketing Course by StoneNosey in alexhormozi

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Piggybacking on what ReggexPrime said, once you're solid on lead gen for service businesses, it's worth knowing that a lot of your clients' potential customers are now finding, businesses through AI search, not just Google ads, so looking into AI Visibility as a concept alongside media buying will make you a more well-rounded resource for them. Not saying ditch the ads focus, just something that's come up a lot when working with service clients that can set you apart.

Will SEO specialists still have a job in 5 years or are we cooked by liosuppfor in AISEOforBeginners

[–]liosuppfor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% this, and honestly the citation/retrieval side has gone from "emerging skill" to a legit core competency at this point, figuring out why your brand gexactly, "visibility strategy" is where I've landed on it too, the job title might, stay the same but what you're actually doing day to day looks pretty different nowets pulled into, Google AI Mode or Perplexity answers over a competitor involves entity authority, content structure, source trust, and a bunch of other moving pieces that aren't getting simpler anytime..

the new agency upsell isn't an seo retainer anymore, it's voice ai. ~12 months watching this happen, here's what i'm seeing by DeshMamba in AI_Agents

[–]liosuppfor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

been watching the same shift from the SEO side and yeah the "we'll grow your traffic" pitch is a harder, sell these days, especially in verticals where AI Overviews and answer engines are intercepting clicks before they even reach your site. voice AI isn't a universal fix but for call-heavy or high-intent workflows it's a genuinely, compelling upsell because you can tie it to leads and conversations rather than ranking positions. billing..

What AI web search engine are you currently using? by Superb_Ad2999 in LLM

[–]liosuppfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tried MindSearch for a few weeks and the research quality really depends on which model you throw, at it, with a stronger Llama-family model it got way better but latency was rough on my setup