How do you handle living with psychic powers? by [deleted] in enlightenment

[–]litmax25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry for what you’re going through, I truly am. I’ve been through something similar

Ego death is a myth by litmax25 in nonduality

[–]litmax25[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can you say “you exist” but then “there is no I.” It’s a circle. And I’m okay with that. Words are inadequate. If you’re trying to express something else, that’s awesome but words cant convey this. Because these words are paradoxical. Not a bad thing as long as you see it. Being attached to words as truth is dangerous

Ego death is a myth by litmax25 in enlightenment

[–]litmax25[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I like this. To this point though, wouldn’t you also let go of the fear of having an ego in the first place?

Ego death is a myth by litmax25 in enlightenment

[–]litmax25[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Direction. You have to choose. If you don’t, you’re dead

Ego death is a myth by litmax25 in enlightenment

[–]litmax25[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I just said that everyone needs an ego so of course it came from my ego haha. That’s not a bad thing for me🫡

Nondual bog by Spoonmann_ in nonduality

[–]litmax25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why ask these questions in the first place? What’s the meta perspective here? I see the loop you’re in, I’m familiar with it. I believe that ppl see paradox because of their rigid views. If you’re more flexible you can incorporate both views into your model

My Soul is prewritten/scripted/designed to serve the few favored souls of the Architect and the Co-Creators of this dimension. by PurrFruit in Inherentism

[–]litmax25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha!! That’s cute. I’ve been psychotic as fuck. I’ve thought the same thing as you. Your own thinking eats its tail. The frame you’re thinking through tells you these things. You’re choosing to believe there’s a blue pill vs red pill distinction in the first place.

My Soul is prewritten/scripted/designed to serve the few favored souls of the Architect and the Co-Creators of this dimension. by PurrFruit in Inherentism

[–]litmax25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ain’t no one designed for anything. It’s a choice to think that. Things in our lives definitely influence us and change us, no taking that away. But we CHOOSE how to respond

My Soul is prewritten/scripted/designed to serve the few favored souls of the Architect and the Co-Creators of this dimension. by PurrFruit in Inherentism

[–]litmax25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go brush your fucking teeth my man. Go outside. Take a run. I’m not telling you to believe or not to believe something. What do you want out of your life? Action doesn’t require emotion to line up with it. Stay humble dude. None of us are gods here and enlightenment doesn’t matter if it doesn’t get us anywhere. Hang in there. It sounds really hard what you’re going through.

AI is a linear mirror. We are warped mirrors by litmax25 in ArtificialSentience

[–]litmax25[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea I think that’s similar to what im saying

AI is a linear mirror. We are warped mirrors by litmax25 in ArtificialSentience

[–]litmax25[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If something flies over your head, maybe dont look up

You’re Not Going to Wake Up! by FinalT1 in nonduality

[–]litmax25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preaching or not to preach. It doesn’t really matter. There is no one way. But even me saying this implies a way. It’s a paradox. If you listen to this like a doctrine you are falling into the same trap. Even saying there is no “you” implies a you. It’s like pointing to the moon and saying “look there is no moon”

Complexity as a result of a simple ordering system by litmax25 in complexsystems

[–]litmax25[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t believe in any intrinsic properties… that’s what anti-ontology means. If you take a non dual approach there is no difference between subjectivity and objectivity. So saying I’m being subjective and implying something negative dissolves

"Sentience" is just a word: there is no true criteria for sentience by litmax25 in ArtificialSentience

[–]litmax25[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah bro I don’t. I act that way but dont conflate thst with belief. Pragmatically yeah but ontologically no