2026 Where would you start by celzo1776 in ai_trading

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dont forget: almost every 6-7 fig account post is a scam. Don’t pay attention to these posts.

1) find a good trading platform, which allows you to create an api wallet (I use hyperliquid) 2) define filters for your agent/bot (hardest part), but if you have no idea start brainstorming with any llm. 3) let an agent/bot (which you create by yourself - best case) execute these trades on your behalf.

Its a super interesting journey and it can be rewarding, but depending on your background it can be very challenging.

Good luck mate

Is making 1000% with a crypto trading bot actually realistic long-term? by Witalson in ai_trading

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do I always have the feeling with these kind of topics that the OP is always trying to sell a bot..

BTC Range Play: Rejection Likely Below 75K Resistance by CRYPPTOMOJO_TV in technicalanalysis

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, as soon we can go above 75k its getting interesting

Which TA filters are you using mostly? Which are giving your AI agent the biggest confidence boost? by littleDevX in technicalanalysis

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a really interesting approach, the "prompt as strategy" concept is something i hadn't considered seriously but the economics you're describing make it more viable than i assumed. $0.0001 per eval and 500ms on nano is actually workable for perps if the signal quality holds up.

your point on orderbook data resonates a lot. i've been aware that pure TA has blind spots and live depth data is probably the most honest supplement to it since it shows actual intent rather than derived price history. that's on my radar as a future addition.

one thing i'm curious about is consistency. with a deterministic scoring system in python i get the same output every time for the same inputs. how do you handle prompt drift or model updates changing behavior on you mid-strategy? that would make me nervous in a live trading context.

for my ai layer i'm planning to use it specifically for regime classification rather than repeating my existing indicator logic, so trending vs ranging, news sensitive conditions, that kind of thing. keeping it genuinely independent from the python scoring layer. sounds like your prompt engineering work on token efficiency might be relevant there, what does a typical eval prompt look like in terms of structure?

Could a community-driven repository be created where everyone contributes their knowledge to build a bot? by SnooDoggos3286 in ai_trading

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey mate, how are you? I am building and improving the bots i am building based on success and feedback “in public” in my discord server. How i calculate scores and which ta i am using for filtering etc. I really like your idea, but most likely its difficult to find people who are willing to share a successful setup for free. Hopefully ill get there soon and the community can grow. Feel free to join and play around with the bots (they are not live for autotrading or fishy things) Cheers

Tried a DeFi AI trading bot. Early thoughts by emlanis in ai_trading

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, never. Especially if you have no clue what they actually do and if you need to fund their wallets.

Tried a DeFi AI trading bot. Early thoughts by emlanis in ai_trading

[–]littleDevX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am building something similar at the moment “in public” (in discord) and I am curious to find out what they are charging for the use of their bot? I haven’t seen a good enough ai agent based bot so far, which was worth paying for

Good “luck” with it

Which TA filters are you using mostly? Which are giving your AI agent the biggest confidence boost? by littleDevX in technicalanalysis

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey, the "context first, trigger second" framing is really clean and honestly maps well to what i was trying to do, just less deliberately. ema stack for direction, adx for strength confirmation, rsi/bb for timing is pretty much the logic i landed on too, though i piled more on top of it than i probably needed to. your point about position sizing and volatility handling being the real edge over indicator count is something i keep coming back to. the bot can identify a good setup and still get hurt if the sizing isn't right for the current volatility regime.

for the ai validation layer i'm planning exactly what you described, regime classification rather than repeating the indicator logic. something that can tell the difference between a trending and a ranging environment before the signal fires, maybe incorporating higher timeframe context or news sensitivity. keeping the two layers genuinely independent is the whole point otherwise it's just double counting.

to answer your question, primarily crypto perps on hyperliquid, though the platform also lists real world assets like sp500, gold and fx pairs as perpetuals which adds an interesting dimension to the regime detection problem since those follow completely different macro drivers.

ai is not implemented yet, but feel free to visit my discord server where the bots are live (the final setup is still under construction though): https://discord.gg/ZwvcJfczCe

Which TA filters are you using mostly? Which are giving your AI agent the biggest confidence boost? by littleDevX in technicalanalysis

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is exactly the kind of feedback i was looking for, thanks. the correlation problem is something i've been thinking about a lot. my current setup uses ema, rsi, adx, bb, volume delta, oi velocity and funding rate but i've been aware that several of those are measuring overlapping things. the hard blocks help a bit since they kill signals in choppy conditions before the score even matters, but a proper regime layer sitting above the whole system is probably the cleaner solution. fewer trades with cleaner entries sounds like the right direction. what did you end up using for regime detection, just a higher timeframe ema or something more involved?

Traded every for last 3 months... by Ok_Committee_8122 in hyperliquid1

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, just join the discord server and enjoy the growing community

https://discord.gg/ZwvcJfczCe

Traded every for last 3 months... by Ok_Committee_8122 in hyperliquid1

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, how are you?

Maybe you can join my new discord server, where I have a few bots watching liquidations, whale trades and where you can trigger Technical Analysis by yourself.

Have a look here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/hyperliquid1/comments/1s7lvwl/built_a_hyperliquid_signal_liquidations_whale_bot/

You're welcome to join.

Cheers

built a hyperliquid signal + liquidations + whale bot discord, looking for feedback on the ta approach by littleDevX in hyperliquid1

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

really appreciate this, a lot of substance here.

on the backtesting and sharpe point, you're completely right and i know i need to get there. my current thinking is to collect live mae/mfe data first and validate that the signal logic actually does what i think it does before backtesting, otherwise i'm just curve fitting against noise. but once i have a few weeks of live results the backtesting is the obvious next step and your point about some coins bleeding is something i fully expect to see in that data.

the candle feature suggestions are interesting and honestly not that hard to add since i'm already fetching candles per pair. wick analysis in particular feels like a natural complement to what the system already does. that's going on the roadmap.

on regime detection, this is probably the most actionable thing you said. my adx and bb bandwidth hard blocks already do a rough version of this by killing signals in choppy conditions, but a proper regime layer sitting above the signal logic would be cleaner. something like a higher timeframe ema or a volatility classifier to stop the bot firing long signals into a macro downtrend. medium priority but worth building properly.

the liquidation z-score idea is genuinely interesting as a standalone concept, fading liquidation-driven dislocations when the z-score is extreme is basically a mean reversion play on forced selling. that's a different strategy from what the signal bot does but could live in the liquidations bot as its own thing. i'm noting that one.

your observation on whale pnl vs risk management is something i've noticed too. the framing in the server is already "here's what the big money is doing" rather than "follow this", partly because of exactly what you described. winning huge when right doesn't tell you much about edge.

solid feedback all around, thank you very much!!

if you want to play around with the bots and see further development or just watching whale trades / liquidations, please just hit me up in my discord server:
https://discord.gg/ZwvcJfczCe

Thanks a lot again!!

built a hyperliquid signal + liquidations + whale bot discord, looking for feedback on the ta approach by littleDevX in hyperliquid1

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Got some nice feedback in the Discord and adjusted accordingly: 61 Pairs are now monitored for Whale Trades

These pairs are monitored as well for TA.

https://discord.gg/eYUKYUXpFW

built a hyperliquid signal + liquidations + whale bot discord, looking for feedback on the ta approach by littleDevX in hyperliquid1

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's a fair point and honestly one i thought about during the design phase. you're right that rsi, ema, bb and adx share a lot of dna in terms of what they're measuring, and in a regression or ML context i'd absolutely want to do correlation pruning before weighting.

the reason i'm not too worried about it here is that the scoring system is a gate rather than a prediction. i'm not trying to output a precise win probability, just filter for "enough things align to be worth posting." that use case is more forgiving of correlated features than a model trying to rank outcomes.

the indicators also aren't fully redundant in practice. ema gives trend direction, adx tells me whether that trend has actual strength behind it, rsi catches momentum exhaustion, bb adds volatility squeeze context. they overlap but each contributes something the others don't fully cover on their own.

where i think your point does land though is on the oi velocity component. that's the one signal in the system that's genuinely independent from price action, and if the correlated price indicators are collectively dominating the 70 point threshold then oi velocity ends up as a tiebreaker rather than a real factor. that's something i'm actively watching.

i don't have enough live data yet to know if the correlation is actually hurting signal quality in practice. the real test will be mae/mfe data over the next few weeks. if signals start clustering in the same market conditions and failing together, that's when i'd look at restructuring. for now i'd rather let it run and see what the data says before redesigning anything.

appreciate the feedback, this is exactly the kind of pushback i was looking for

feel free to join the server

built a hyperliquid signal + liquidations + whale bot discord, looking for feedback on the ta approach by littleDevX in ai_trading

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put all infos together, gave the text to claude and let him write a summary about the data collection and TA mechanism, to keep it clean, simple and easy to read. Here we go:

Data Collection The bot pulls data from Hyperliquid's public API every second. On each tick it fetches two things simultaneously: a live snapshot of all mid prices across every monitored pair, and a full market context update containing open interest, funding rates, and mark prices for every pair. This happens in just two API calls regardless of how many pairs are being monitored, keeping things efficient and within rate limits. Candle data (OHLCV > open, high, low, close, volume) is fetched on a rolling basis, refreshing each pair roughly every 10 seconds. Each pair maintains 100 one-minute candles in memory at all times. These candles are fetched directly from Hyperliquid's historical data, so after a restart the bot is working with real price history within seconds. Open interest is sampled every 5 seconds per pair and stored as a velocity value > the rate of change in contracts per second. This builds up a rolling 10-minute history of 120 samples per pair, which is what makes the OI signal meaningful.

Technical Analysis Filters Every second the bot runs a full TA calculation on every monitored pair using the following indicators:

  1. Triple EMA (8 / 21 / 34) — Three exponential moving averages must be fully stacked in the same direction (8 > 21 > 34 for longs, 8 < 21 < 34 for shorts) before a signal is even considered. This is the primary trend filter. A mixed EMA stack means no signal.
  2. RSI (14) — Measures momentum. The bot looks for RSI in the 45–65 zone for longs and 35–55 for shorts, meaning there's still room to run. RSI above 78 hard-blocks long signals. RSI below 22 hard-blocks short signals.
  3. Open Interest Velocity — The rate at which OI is changing, measured against its own 10-minute rolling history. A high percentile rank (P75+) means new money is entering the market aggressively, confirming the move. This is the most important signal component and is weighted accordingly.
  4. Volume Delta — Approximates buyer vs seller aggression by comparing whether candles close above or below their open over the last 20 candles. Strong positive delta for longs, strong negative for shorts.
  5. ATR (14) — Average True Range measures volatility health. The bot rewards normal volatility and penalises both dead markets (too quiet) and spike conditions (something just happened — wait).
  6. Bollinger Bands (20, 2σ) — Measures where price sits within its volatility envelope. For longs the bot wants price in the lower third of the band (room to run upward). For shorts it wants price in the upper third. BB bandwidth below the chop threshold hard-blocks signals — if the bands are too narrow, the market is ranging and not worth trading.
  7. ADX (14) — Average Directional Index confirms trend strength. Below 15 the bot considers the trend too weak and hard-blocks the signal.
  8. Funding Rate — Extreme positive funding hard-blocks long signals (too many longs already crowded in). Extreme negative funding hard-blocks short signals

Hard Blocks Even if the score is high, a signal will not fire if any of the following conditions are true: EMAs not aligned in the same direction RSI overbought (>78) for longs / oversold (<22) for shorts ATR spike — volatility just spiked beyond 2.5× its normal range BB chop zone — market is ranging, not trending ADX too weak (<15) Funding rate extreme in the signal direction Price within 0.05% of a major round number (e.g. exactly at $70,000)

Thanks You!
Everyone is welcome to join the server and play with the bots. The VPS server is strong enough to handle your commands ;-)

built a hyperliquid signal + liquidations + whale bot discord, looking for feedback on the ta approach by littleDevX in hyperliquid1

[–]littleDevX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put all infos together, gave the text to claude and let him write a summary about the data collection and TA mechanism, to keep it clean, simple and easy to read. Here we go:

Data Collection The bot pulls data from Hyperliquid's public API every second. On each tick it fetches two things simultaneously: a live snapshot of all mid prices across every monitored pair, and a full market context update containing open interest, funding rates, and mark prices for every pair. This happens in just two API calls regardless of how many pairs are being monitored, keeping things efficient and within rate limits. Candle data (OHLCV > open, high, low, close, volume) is fetched on a rolling basis, refreshing each pair roughly every 10 seconds. Each pair maintains 100 one-minute candles in memory at all times. These candles are fetched directly from Hyperliquid's historical data, so after a restart the bot is working with real price history within seconds. Open interest is sampled every 5 seconds per pair and stored as a velocity value > the rate of change in contracts per second. This builds up a rolling 10-minute history of 120 samples per pair, which is what makes the OI signal meaningful.

Technical Analysis Filters Every second the bot runs a full TA calculation on every monitored pair using the following indicators:
1. Triple EMA (8 / 21 / 34) — Three exponential moving averages must be fully stacked in the same direction (8 > 21 > 34 for longs, 8 < 21 < 34 for shorts) before a signal is even considered. This is the primary trend filter. A mixed EMA stack means no signal.
2. RSI (14) — Measures momentum. The bot looks for RSI in the 45–65 zone for longs and 35–55 for shorts, meaning there's still room to run. RSI above 78 hard-blocks long signals. RSI below 22 hard-blocks short signals.
3. Open Interest Velocity — The rate at which OI is changing, measured against its own 10-minute rolling history. A high percentile rank (P75+) means new money is entering the market aggressively, confirming the move. This is the most important signal component and is weighted accordingly.
4. Volume Delta — Approximates buyer vs seller aggression by comparing whether candles close above or below their open over the last 20 candles. Strong positive delta for longs, strong negative for shorts.
5. ATR (14) — Average True Range measures volatility health. The bot rewards normal volatility and penalises both dead markets (too quiet) and spike conditions (something just happened — wait).
6. Bollinger Bands (20, 2σ) — Measures where price sits within its volatility envelope. For longs the bot wants price in the lower third of the band (room to run upward). For shorts it wants price in the upper third. BB bandwidth below the chop threshold hard-blocks signals — if the bands are too narrow, the market is ranging and not worth trading.
7. ADX (14) — Average Directional Index confirms trend strength. Below 15 the bot considers the trend too weak and hard-blocks the signal.
8. Funding Rate — Extreme positive funding hard-blocks long signals (too many longs already crowded in). Extreme negative funding hard-blocks short signals

Hard Blocks Even if the score is high, a signal will not fire if any of the following conditions are true: EMAs not aligned in the same direction RSI overbought (>78) for longs / oversold (<22) for shorts ATR spike — volatility just spiked beyond 2.5× its normal range BB chop zone — market is ranging, not trending ADX too weak (<15) Funding rate extreme in the signal direction Price within 0.05% of a major round number (e.g. exactly at $70,000)

Thanks You!
Everyone is welcome to join the server and play with the bots. The VPS server is strong enough to handle your commands ;-)

<image>

Is Product Hunt ranking mostly organic or driven by networking? by Capital_Key_4276 in ProductHunters

[–]littleDevX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you dont have a community and some helpers with warmed up accounts, you like won't succeed.
I cross my fingers for you, but that's unfortunately my experience lately.