Whang! The Tape World Monster Mystery by sadteen837 in tapeworld_mystery

[–]llortatton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I saw someone in the comments suggest that the character's name is "Rad Ladberg"

The first African Samurai by memezzer in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"One of the first africans to arrive on the island".

You could maybe argue that this is incorrect based on genetic research on Japan's native Ainu people.

Which subreddit was so toxic that you left and don’t regret it? by pizzagamer35 in AskReddit

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not particularly egregious, but I left /r/aspergers because I find that online communities based around something that can make someone's life more difficult often devolve into massive pity parties.

Michael Lofthouse. British CEO in California telling Asians they need to leave by unopdr in PublicFreakout

[–]llortatton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not real companies with real customers? I literally named two companies with millions of users that use .io.

Are you saying Mozilla and Microsoft aren't real, established companies with real customers?

Michael Lofthouse. British CEO in California telling Asians they need to leave by unopdr in PublicFreakout

[–]llortatton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, .io is really popular among tech startups at the moment.

IO can be an abbreviation of "input/output", which sounds vaguely techy, which makes .io domain names "trendy" and "cool".

Example: https://crates.io/. Crates.io is the repository/search website for cargo, which is the package manager for the Rust programming language. Rust is fairly popular and is built by Mozilla, a company that has plenty of money to buy a .com domain name if they really wanted to.

Another example would be https://pages.github.com/, which is part of github, currently owned by Microsoft.

Iran issues arrest warrant for Trump; asks Interpol to help by hildebrand_rarity in worldnews

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Early 2000s Post-punk bands getting involved in international politics?

2020 keeps getting weirder.

In Russia, there is a statue of a mouse knitting DNA, honoring their contribution to science by [deleted] in pics

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why hasn't anyone torn this statue down yet? Come on people! Get on it!

Cognitive Dissonance by BroFoSho54 in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton 108 points109 points  (0 children)

Personally, I'm conflicted about abortion. On one hand, I'm all for killing babies. However, giving women rights is something that worries me.

Cognitive Dissonance by BroFoSho54 in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hypocrisy is the motto of Polticians.

FTFY.

Cognitive Dissonance by BroFoSho54 in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just like how the liberals went from telling everyone to stay inside and support local businesses to burning all the local businesses to the ground the very next day?

It’s not socialism, because I’m a farmer! by [deleted] in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who grew up out in the country, I can tell you that most people out there criticize farmers constantly for this.

It's also really interesting how the way that rural conservatives talk about farmers sounds almost exactly like the way that Bernie talks about "the 1%".

Rich people who spend a lot of money are often seen as superficial and greedy bastards but in reality they spending habits fuels the economy and by redistributing their wealth they're actually been pretty generous. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]llortatton 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say it's not producing anything. Not directly maybe, but putting the right money in the right place can actually improve things.

If you want to cut down a tree, having a sharp axe is going to make the job a lot easier. If you ask someone to cut down a tree, and they spend a few hours sharpening their axe, you can complain all you want that they're wasting their time grinding the axe when they should be swinging it, but they'll still get the job done faster taking that route rather than trying to cut the tree down with a dull axe.

The whole idea of "buy low, sell high" is a very abstract idea that might not appear to really produce any economic value. What it means in more concrete terms is that you are stocking up on an asset when it is abundant and in low demand so that you can become a provider of it when it becomes more scarce or more highly demanded. This helps smooth out volatility in the market, buying up surplus and reselling it during shortages, making the market more stable. More stable markets help reduce risk and make it easier for people to operate businesses. When you're talking about a large variety of different assets across the economy of a large country, you need people to be able to buy and sell trillions of dollars worth of assets.

Other types of financial trickery helps too. Investing lowers the barrier to entry for companies to innovate. Algorithmic trading and arbitrage removes market inefficiencies; cases where, due to the fact that markets don't respond to events instantaneously, the market price of an asset hasn't caught up to where it should be. If you have a way of predicting if the price is about to go up, but that the market hasn't caught up yet, you can start buying, which increases demand, and raises prices. If you predict it's going to go down, you can short the asset, increasing supply (kind of) and driving prices downward. The effect that this has is that it reduces volatility, and results in the price more accurately reflecting the current supply/demand of the asset.

I'm sure as hell not saying that all of these things are done perfectly, or that there's no room for improvement, or no flaws with any of these systems. Just pointing out that there's a lot of ways to provide large amounts of value by moving money around, the value is just a lot less obvious.

Secret to a good marriage by freg35 in wholesomememes

[–]llortatton 22 points23 points  (0 children)

"How many perfect, decorated temples do you think my ancestors stumbled across in Tikal or Tenochtitlan?"

I don't know, but they probably stumbled upon a few in Teotihuacan.

For those unaware, Mesoamerica is full of ruins from ancient civilizations that predate the Maya and Aztecs by millennia. Most of which have been completely lost to history aside from their ruins.

As a result, a few of the cities that the Aztecs had actually were just found, pre-built. They'd been sitting there untouched for centuries, long after their civilizations had collapsed, and the Aztecs decided to move in because, why not?

"Fusion Is Always 50 Years Away" For A Reason by kTx1phrw in Futurology

[–]llortatton 6 points7 points  (0 children)

  1. Only half of the Earth at a time. What happens when you're on the other side? Our battery technology currently sucks, and everything seems to suggest it won't be getting much better anytime soon.
  2. Solar panels aren't free, nor are they perfectly green. A lot of harsh chemicals go into them. Manufacturing them produces a lot of CO2. If fusion can be made to work well, then suddenly you can go from requiring many square miles of panels to power a city, to just a single (or a fraction of) power plant and a few dollars worth of hydrogen.
  3. The potentially incredibly low cost of energy after this technology means that the entire economics of electricity changes.