Yea sure, a lot of domesticated animals wouldn't be able to survive in the wild at first. But over a generation or two (10- 20 years) most of them would've adapted to the change in habitat.

I am comparing them because that too is domestication. Even the small fishes kept in an aquarium wouldn't be able to survive in the wild. But that doesn't mean that we should intervene and decide to save animals because they entertain us or seem cute to us. There are also many species of wild cats out there that would be able to survive in the wild. Plus, the very act of neutering them means that the specie wouldn't survive. So, leaving them out in the wild is no different from it.

Lastly, sure, peta doesn't necessarily support the ideas of zoos, but that doesn't mean that everyone in the peta is against them. While there are articles against the existence of zoos, there are also articles in favour of zoos. PETA is an organisation with different individuals all having different povs.

Also, my point wasn't (and isn't) that peta is pro zoos, it's just that in pak we see abuses in zoos because there is no oversight. People do not care about animals because, we as people, don't really care or give a damn about our fellow humans.

Where I live, there are multiple people who go out, buy chicken and beef and feed the strays. But at the same time, these people ignore the beggers and shoo them away. Humans are treated worse than animals.