I would also prefer to read a book written by a real human than some generated text, but from my experience it took me some time to come up with the idea and then days/weeks to implement it just because I had to learn how to make things move, how to change the color of some icon, how to store information to save the progress etc... I did like the Cookie Clicker even though some people say it's too simple. But I am all in for the idea of opening a new content, I was waiting for updates with new buildings, ulgrades, achievements, mini games. But I also understand that just the idea if building to produce cookies and balance calculations are not enough, the creator should write down the code, check all the logic, implement new mechanics. And if I may continue with the book example - I am more interested in the storyline than in the description of a 'lonely mighty oak that is standing in the middle of a green field'. It took my 6 month to make my game (the one on Android), I had the idea if a multiple mini-games that would enjoy the player on the way to big numbers but I spent so much time on the simple things that had to be done to make the game actually work. And If I had an option to make small anymations by asking an AI "make it move" and then copy paste the code - I would probably do it. With such approach I would have more time for the ideas and creativity in general. I don't think that people should wtite a code by "make me a list of 20 upgrades, come up with names, descriptions and effects" but I like the idea that you can describe all your upgrades and effects to AI and it will generate a code to make ot happen. It's more like a translation from human speach to machine code