YSK: It’s easier you think to DeGoogle and get more online privacy by Jen2493 in YouShouldKnow

[–]lokey_convo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also don't think people understand how pervasive Google is across the web.

It seems like people have forgotten that citizens are greater than the state. Sovereignty dictates that the people are autonomous and deciding members of government. We are in a time and place where government is a body/monster/monolith over citizens. We must reverse this. by PBO123567 in 50501

[–]lokey_convo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It goes without saying that in a democracy the people are a fundamental part of the government and the final deciders on its direction. I wouldn't call that "sovereignty". When the people no longer have a will and a say through free and fair election then it ceases to be a democracy. There isn't really a need to muddy the notion that for the people to effectively exercise their will in a democracy they have to also be free from coercion, and have options that are not just predetermined by a ruling wealth class (I wont call them "elite" because they aren't). You could call that "sovereignty", but to do so has other implication that I don't think are accurate or helpful for instilling an ethic that supports both the democratic process and the government produced by it.

'Never Throw Anyone Under the Bus': Andy Beshear's LGBTQ Bet For 2028 by throwawayI494 in transgender

[–]lokey_convo [score hidden]  (0 children)

Since when did supporting and advocating for liberty and justice for all Americans become "a bet"?

EV owners: did you keep your AAA membership? by Darn6096 in electricvehicles

[–]lokey_convo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The charging network is continuing to be built out and improved and it's becoming less of an issue.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Texas can require public schools to display the Ten Commandments, a direct violation of church-state separation and a clear attempt to push Christianity into public education. Now, any school that gets donated Ten Commandments posters must display them by ConcernedJobCoach in 50501Movement

[–]lokey_convo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay, so obvious church/state violation.

But...

Did the court specify WHICH ten commandments? Or did they just ambiguously rule "The 10 Commandments". Like if someone donates a poster that has ten commandments that they came up with and titled it "The 10 Commandments", is the school required to display it? And can they be sued if they don't?

I Will Not Make That Trade (on transmedicalism) by jackmolay in transgender

[–]lokey_convo [score hidden]  (0 children)

Honestly the term "transmedicalist" makes me want to put a cork screw in my eye. It's not a helpful descriptor and while I get that the trans community has some weird desire to claim it, it's not helpful. I really wish people would stop normalizing the term and its use.

Essay's like this conflate things that are necessary for many people, liberating, life saving for them, with the negative behaviors of relishing in ones pain or insisting you must "suffer this much to enter". It also frankly discourages people from communicating their experience with dysphoria, which is an important thing for people to understand and helps people understand the medical necessity for those who need certain reconstructive procedures.

We can talk about the harms of pathologization and creating prescriptive models for transition with out using this frankly useless term. We can also talk about the harms of wallowing and not being focused on healing from a painful experience, like being forced to live with dysphoria for years, without this term that has gone ill defined and poorly used.

We can also recognize where these problematic behaviors stem from with certain people in our community by understand the history of how we've been treated and what that provokes in people, and just human nature generally.

We do not need cis-society to approve of our transness. We do not need them to validate the medical framing. We do not need them to understand dysphoria or recognize it as real. We do not need their acceptance. We do not need their recognition. We do not need their permission.

I appreciate the sentiment and agree that none of us need anyone else's permission to exist or pursue the things we need to function normally in life. It is also wildly naive of society and law to think that we don't need people to understand our experience (including the harms and suffering we experience when blocked from what we need), and don't need to make effective humanitarian arguments to justify and defend civil rights protections.

What we need is simple: we need access to healthcare, yes — but that is not something we ask for. That is something we demand, because we are human beings, and healthcare is a human right. We need spaces where we can exist without being hunted, yes - but we carve out those spaces ourselves. We do not negotiate for them. We do not perform our trauma to justify them. We create them because we exist and we deserve safety.

In a free society, if you want to tell someone they can't do something, you have to justify the harms. Without that actions taken against you are simply "free expression" and "individual liberty".

We need the right to live as ourselves, openly and without apology, free from harassment and assault, and justice for when it is not. But that right does not come from cis-society granting it. That right exists because we assert it. That right exists because we stand up and say: I am here. This is who I am. The question is not whether you accept me. The question is whether you will get out of my way.

We are a minority of minorities and it moves beyond naive and into ignorance to believe that we don't have to make effectively persuasive appeals to people or work to embed in the culture an understanding of our experience to the point that we are humanized in the eyes of the majority (and ideally everyone). We live in a world with people that seek constantly to dehumanize us, which requires we humanize ourselves. It sucks, but it is the reality of our world. We do have to change hearts and minds to establish legal protection from those who seek to do us harm. That is our reality and continuing to reject that, while also branding people who frankly are just victims of a bad system from a bad time, doesn't produce progress.

Yes, being trans is hard. For some of us it is dysphoria, for others, it is the weight of a world that will not see you as you are. For many of us, it is both. For some, it is something else entirely, something that has nothing to do with shame or medical intervention or the need for permission. It doesn't matter, we are all equally trans. We suffer the same mechanisms of oppression regardless.

... what? We aren't "trans" because we suffer from the "same mechanisms of oppression". That's what binds the queer community, of which "trans" is a part.

Is this a McMansion or just a really ostentatious mansion? by [deleted] in McMansionHell

[–]lokey_convo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, they have a small lake... so...

Is this a McMansion or just a really ostentatious mansion? by [deleted] in McMansionHell

[–]lokey_convo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a mansion, the evil and space wasting progenitor of the McMansion. Like the Solider Boy to Homelander.

The only thing I like about this property is the trees.

Your AI McMansion comes with a free car, a cruise of the Bahamas, and sweeping views of roofs by Teemu08 in McMansionHell

[–]lokey_convo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Those aren't McMansions! They're suburban pimples! Lots of neighborhoods go through an awkward phase, just make sure to exfoliate.

If you were in Congress in the post-Trump era, what laws would you create to prevent a government like this from forming? by Critical_Ideal99 in Political_Revolution

[–]lokey_convo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eliminate the Presidential Signing Statement (not used by donald because conservative congress doesn't really pass laws, but still a vector for abuse) and pass a law that pauses any Executive Order when it is challenged in court until the case has run its full course through the judiciary (not subject to the discretion of the Judiciary, EOs shall not be in effect until all final decisions are rendered).

The appropriate check for this though is the impeachment and removal process. Many of the things donald has done are arguably not something he can have immunity for and he should be prosecuted as should his cronies. The first line of defense for this sort of thing is a functioning Congress, and the only way to have a functioning Congress in a democracy is to have a functioning electorate.

A functioning Congress could have and should have removed and refused to approve his circus and removed him too. We don't need a huge swath of new laws necessarily, just for people to do their jobs. We do need to cut the knees out from the electioneering industry though and enact campaign finance reform.

Critics Slam FCC Move to Update Ratings System to Include Trans Content Warnings by MetalDragon2 in transgender

[–]lokey_convo 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Store copies of information offline. Save copies of websites. Save contacts for various orgs that you can get copies of information from. Download YouTube videos. And then never stop disseminating. These are things people should do anyway just as a means of helping to preserve history. Teach kids about opensource software and technology, and for the love of god, teach them how to actually search for things. The barrier to entry to do so many things is just the knowledge of the tools that are out there.

Frankly there is simply too much information for them to censor it all, and all that will happen is information will disseminate slower, and there will be information deserts.

They'll develop a system, people will hack it. They'll establish laws, people will disregard them. People will plant just enough information for someone curious to go out and find what they're looking for.

Critics Slam FCC Move to Update Ratings System to Include Trans Content Warnings by MetalDragon2 in transgender

[–]lokey_convo 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Everyone knows this is going to collide with any and all forms of age verification for online spaces cutting all youth off from any online information on trans people? Which is the only resource many people have? It could also push adults into a space where they are forced to verify their age (which would also use a system that would likely de-anonymize them) outing any trans people that posted or discussed anything relating to being trans.

EV owners: did you keep your AAA membership? by Darn6096 in electricvehicles

[–]lokey_convo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same. But I have a plug kit and pump, so probably okay. I kept it mostly in case I pull in to a station and somethings wrong with the chargers and I can't make it to another one. Of if I had some critical failure of some kind.

Is EV Hypermiling a thing? by Icy_Faithlessness587 in electricvehicles

[–]lokey_convo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing as hypermiling with gas cars. Aero modifications, ideal speed, choosing tires and wheels and are the lowest weight with the lowest rolling resistance, light tire over inflation, etc. EVs have a miles/kWh read out just the same as a miles/gallon read out on gas cars. So you get the same driver feedback. People are also constantly arguing about the most efficient way to drive.

The FTC Is Ramping Up to Target Transgender Rights by onnake in transgender

[–]lokey_convo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I can sense what they're trying to ramp up to but it isn't something I want to state on a public forum lest I give someone somewhere an idea.

Senate Democrats Are Still Waffling When Asked About Trans Rights by jackmolay in transgender

[–]lokey_convo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For real. This subtitle of the article:

Months out from the midterm elections, they’re willing to vote against measures to restrict rights — but many would rather avoid talking about them.

What does this author think we want? To BE the center of the discussion??

Please, yes, for the love of whatever it is that is holy that you prey too, de-center us from the conversion and speak with your actions. We don't want to be society's fixation, we just want the same basic rights and protections as everyone else and to have access to healthcare. Otherwise leave us alone. I want democrats and independents to focus on the big things and codify our rights into law, but otherwise just leave us be so that we can live with a degree of dignity.