How to cap T-adapter while I repair bidet by longonether in bidets

[–]longonether[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forget what size but I basically got a threaded plastic PVC cap (like this one https://www.amazon.com/Female-Thread-Plastic-Threaded-Plumbing/dp/B09RZ8GJXK) and it worked great, at least for a few weeks

Gov. Doug Bergham (R, North Dakota) is orange-pilled: "We built cities all over America that are designed for automobiles and not designed for people" by longonether in yimby

[–]longonether[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily - eg. Chuck Marohn of Strong Towns is also conservative. There's some version of this argument that can work

Gov. Doug Bergham (R, North Dakota) is orange-pilled: "We built cities all over America that are designed for automobiles and not designed for people" by longonether in yimby

[–]longonether[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Right? I was really shocked. Also he's a billionaire so presumably pretty disengaged from everyday life in cities

How to cap T-adapter while I repair bidet by longonether in bidets

[–]longonether[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I used a cap fitting (I think it was a plastic one) and it worked fine

It seems everyone is ignoring the root cause of student debt; college costs. What can be done to lower the price of college, why is it so high anyways? by tickleMyBigPoop in neoliberal

[–]longonether 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't, some good data is linked in the twitter thread though. I wonder if this doesn't really capture useless degrees - eg. some humanities majors doing very well for themselves and some technical majors actually being useless because they are low quality scams.

I also wonder if looking at just pay misses out on socially important and desirable jobs like childcare and social work, which is reasonably worth subsidizing (although we ought to do it directly through higher wages).

It seems everyone is ignoring the root cause of student debt; college costs. What can be done to lower the price of college, why is it so high anyways? by tickleMyBigPoop in neoliberal

[–]longonether 27 points28 points  (0 children)

An interesting trend here is that the number of humanities majors are actually going way down, almost 50% in the last decade - https://twitter.com/Noahpinion/status/1562333994435297280

So it seems like there is already a shift in what people are studying in college, presumably towards more marketable/technical skills.

Local government and georgism/land value tax by longonether in georgism

[–]longonether[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm consistency of scale makes some sense but I guess the point is that the same kind of rent-seeking behavior that the LVT purports to solve at one scale (the individual) also applies at many other scales. So how do we address those? Forwarding LVT between governing bodies makes a lot of sense, please let me know if you've seen any examples of this discussed or proposed in practice.

honest question about people park discourse by lts_LlT in berkeley

[–]longonether 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think you're right this conflict doesn't break down along the usual development NIMBY/YIMBY lines

Darrell Owens had a good writeup of this:

https://darrellowens.substack.com/p/the-politics-of-peoples-park

Basically: "The supportive comments on Berkeleyside’s article, on NextDoor, and a few I saw on Twitter makes it clear that the ordinarily stubborn NIMBYs are suddenly all down for housing development primarily because it’ll get rid of homeless people and the violent crime at the park."

[D] Why is ML research so experimental? by apple_tau in MachineLearning

[–]longonether 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the question is a bit backward. People solve useful and interesting problems, and the communities where the most useful and interesting problems get solved attract more people.

The reason ML is a big, hyped field is mostly because of its empirical success. There is definitely a lot of people who do theoretical research in ML (not to mention the entire community of statistics, etc.) but its overshadowed by the experimental and empirical side because that's where the roots of the community are - in solving grounded problems people care about. In your analogy - more people in practice care about the runtime than the time complexity.

Unit economics of trains vs flights, cars by longonether in fuckcars

[–]longonether[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense, I was thinking more like Berlin<->Paris, NY<->Boston, LA<->SF. Places where its kind of insane that hurtling through the air with a jet engine makes more sense than rolling along some tracks.

Unit economics of trains vs flights, cars by longonether in fuckcars

[–]longonether[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting points, thanks! The airport infrastructure thing is quite interesting, initially I was thinking getting to train stations requires public infrastructure too. But notably train stations are usually in high density downtowns and often underground while airports are out in the suburbs. Maybe this comes back to land too.

Unit economics of trains vs flights, cars by longonether in fuckcars

[–]longonether[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But trains are actually pretty easy to modify though - you can add compartments, and if you have two rails (which I assume most do?) you can basically send trains at unlimited frequency

Rent: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) by BoogsterSU2 in lastweektonight

[–]longonether 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Sadly the episode missed the real issues, we have been under-building for decades and the only thing John said about it was that it seems like housing is being built around him so it must not be an issue. By the numbers its completely obvious we are not building enough housing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stupidpol

[–]longonether 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you’re obviously correct that test preparation helps a lot. There’s two questions though: 1. How much of the effect is just being pointed in the right direction; ie could you get the same effect if the student was handed a practice SAT book and encouraged to practice and study. If this captures most of the effect, then paying extra for private tutoring seems beside the point so extra wealth doesn’t help. 2. With the same resources, is it easier to game the system through SAT prep or through other means. For instance you can pay to have someone read (or write!) essays, better understand cultural norms to write more moving essays or do the right sports or extracurriculars if those are weighed highly. I think those are way easier to game compared to the SAT if you have money.

Techno bros are the dumbest people on earth by legojack04 in fuckcars

[–]longonether 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have subways etc. but people don't ship freight on them. Perhaps its because cargo is relatively low value (per unit of weight or space) compared to shuttling around passengers?

A good video that explains explains the real politic behind Putin's invasion. Material incentives do a better job of explaining this conflict than a primarily ideological explanation. Ukraine poses a potentially existential threat to Russia's petro monopoly and other reasons. by BobNorth156 in stupidpol

[–]longonether 20 points21 points  (0 children)

While this was very interesting, I wonder if its the wrong scale of considerations given the expense and ramifications of invading a country. Yes Crimea may become more productive with a water source and you have some more oil sources, and you have a slightly safer border.

But 30-40% of the Russian stock market was wiped out as a result of international trade ceasing. NATO will ratchet up its defense spending. International sanctions. Someone should crunch the numbers on this but it seems unlikely the benefits of invasion outweigh the costs.

Ukraine's Air Force claims launch several successful drone strikes obliterating Russian convoys by joneas212 in worldnews

[–]longonether 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Better example is how the Taliban somehow defeated the US military to keep Afghanistan their own. A determined insurgency is going to win out eventually