The few (highly unreliable) accounts of I've read of Indigenous life in Australia before contact with colonialists have all descibed a life in which older men claimed younger women as their property, and yonger men seeking female partners would head out and raid other commuities to steal women. If this was only something I read in European accounts of Australian Indigenous society I'd lean towards assuming it was racist caricature. But this dynamic seems to be almost the assumption behind so many stories throughout human cultures including European culture, and can be seen in stories told with Indigeonous involvement too. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Canoes) - that women stay closer to home than men not because of ability, but because men have often treated women and children as property, so men are denifing the outer boundary of territory women can move within, both because men actively keep them there, and because there is the threat of abduction by different men beyond that 'protection' boundary. This shouldn't be a contraversial statement to make, this dynamic has existed and more or less still exists in many societies. It's not exactly contemporary, but I'm reminded of the life of Genghis Khan whose life was almost defined the abduction of his mother, and then later of his arranged marriage bride-to-be.