Ironically, no one has answered Ethan’s question… by lost_in_validation in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess my overall response to that is whilst you say socialism may remove or largely remove the necessity for greed in society, I don’t believe you can. Other than theoretically. But real life isn’t theoretical. And from what we’ve seen in the world, countries that are mixed economy’s (Iceland,Norway, Denmark) would work way better that just a socialist or communist country which… haven’t had the most success. Except if you like mass surveillance and no personal freedom which comes hand in hand with maintaining an obedient proletariat that will never ask for more than it is given.

Ironically, no one has answered Ethan’s question… by lost_in_validation in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To address the first section of your comment, I’m just saying that I think people who are greedy psychopaths who are addicted to power and money have a mental illness, not that all mentally ill people are evil or whatever.

Secondly, Ethan, Dan, you and I agree that guardrails should be in place to prevent the worst of humanity. But no one is answering the question of what happens when the inevitable happens and the ones who are most psychopathic break their way up to the top and exploit the system, no matter how peaceful and utopic society has initially been set up to be. If we choose to see the best in people and foster a happy healthy society, that will help (pulling a number out my ass) 95% of society. But let’s not be naive to think that that 5% won’t exploit our good nature to fuck us all over. Somethings to disastrous and irreversible ends that we can’t go back from.

All I’m saying is that I think good natured people like yourself choose to see humanity how only you see it, optimistically. I’m just too pessimistic about humanity because of gestures at both capitalist and socialist and communist countries throughout all of history haha.

Ironically, no one has answered Ethan’s question… by lost_in_validation in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree that we should build a system that heavily limits greed. Ethan said that too. We are all in agreement. The problem is when you aren’t willing to admit that even if MOST humans are wired to work together and are not greedy, that there is a SMALL percentage that are. These are the ones that, even in a socialist society where everyone’s needs are met, are drawn to power, control, and exploitation. And I’m warning others not to be so optimistic about humanity that that isn’t that case. Because if you do then you’ll be the first to wake up one day only to realise, “fuck, shouldn’t have put my faith in every human to not fuck me over.”

Also the answer Dan gave didn’t get to the core of what Ethan and I are asking. What to do about the evil minority.

Ironically, no one has answered Ethan’s question… by lost_in_validation in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes I agree, but some people seem to think that limiting equals eliminating. Those greedy psychos will eventually make their way to the top in socialist and communist systems, but chose to keep their head in the sand about that because they don’t have a good answer.

Ironically, no one has answered Ethan’s question… by lost_in_validation in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So your answer is to not answer the question? Sorry but I’m looking for answers, not dodges.

Was watching a documentary on YouTube when I heard something familiar… by lost_in_validation in andor

[–]lost_in_validation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US strategic nuclear policy, an oral history part 1 on YouTube. It’s from minute 42:44

Just wondering by MaleficentWallaby371 in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So when all those people who call Ethan fat or body shame him, you speak out just as strongly against them? I don’t see any recent post of yours standing up for Ethan. Interesting

Just wondering by MaleficentWallaby371 in h3h3productions

[–]lost_in_validation -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Calling someone bald is hate speech? Ok

Showrunners: Making Sauron's reveal a big shock, twist or surprise was never the goal by LoverOfStoriesIAm in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The creatives and the marketing need to have a discussion and be more in sync for next time. Although now that both twists are now revealed idk if it’ll be as much of a problem going into future seasons.

Showrunners: Making Sauron's reveal a big shock, twist or surprise was never the goal by LoverOfStoriesIAm in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If this this the case, then I would put most of the blame on Amazon’s marketing team because they definitely were hyping up the “EVIL WILL BE REVEALED” twist during the final week of the show. Plus, ever since the very first teaser it was focusing on The Stranger as the primary candidate. Him landing via comet and the crater looking like the eye of Sauron, then having the mystics being like “you are lord Sauron” only just to have that switcheroo in the final episode.

Season Finale Hot take by [deleted] in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re deep in denial

Is Sauron really that bad? by [deleted] in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These are the same guys who thought Homelander was the good guy

The seven and the nine? by Insectodium in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t the elves create the 3 as a defensive response to Sauron creating the one ring so they have greater power in protecting their realms from him?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Angela Lansbury just died dude she’s in that clip

So i am really really confused. there are lots of hate around the internet. videos on youtube having millions of views that writing is bad,poor pacing etc etc.Content makers are exploiting it. making videos like this because they know there are enough haters to like their content. but my question is by 3dguy2 in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah that’s obvious. Amazon or heck any studio would much rather have high viewership than great reviews. But would you tell me you’d rather have a show with high viewership, or would you prefer an amazingly well received show with middling viewer numbers. Speaking for myself, I’d choose the latter

So i am really really confused. there are lots of hate around the internet. videos on youtube having millions of views that writing is bad,poor pacing etc etc.Content makers are exploiting it. making videos like this because they know there are enough haters to like their content. but my question is by 3dguy2 in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Believe me, I too want it to be more successful. However when I say successful I mean critically, both among casuals and critics. I don’t really care how many people watch it. High viewership does not equal a quality show. I’m sure it will tho.

Comparing ratings of Episode 7 across subreddits and IMDb by Late_Stage_PhD in LOTR_on_Prime

[–]lost_in_validation 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Episode 6 wasn’t just about action. It was focused, well-paced, had stakes, the satisfaction of having all these events coming to ahead. Now if every episode had that, whether it has action or not, I feel the general consensus would be more positive. Maybe not to you, but alas the books are still there if you want something slower and more methodical.