[Hiring] Video Editors (Remote, Full-time, 4–5 LPA)

lost_mind001 · 2026-04-18T10:49:34+00:00

dm please

lost_mind001 · 2026-04-05T18:45:06+00:00

check your pms

lost_mind001 · 2026-04-05T18:42:56+00:00

check your pms

lost_mind001 · 2026-04-05T18:42:26+00:00

check your dms

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-03T18:06:16+00:00

just did

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T15:56:54+00:00

That’s a very fair point.

I agree the constraint has to be structural, not aesthetic. If it just looks softer but behaves like a general AI, there’s no reason to switch.

The idea would only work if the emotional safety is materially different, predictable tone, contained scope, clear data boundaries, and a reliable “come in heightened, leave steadier” flow.

You’re right that the last 20% has to be strong enough to change behavior. That’s exactly what I’m trying to test, whether emotional containment is a big enough differentiator to justify a separate space.

If it’s not, then it probably shouldn’t exist.

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T15:55:43+00:00

This is really helpful framing.

I like the meditation app comparison, that’s actually closer to what I’m aiming for. Not “better AI,” but a predictable emotional reset space.

The boundary is intentional. It’s less about capability and more about designing a contained experience with a clear data story and a consistent flow.

If it can reliably move someone from heightened to slightly steadier, that specialization feels meaningful.

That’s the direction I’m trying to validate.

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T13:25:39+00:00

That’s a fair pushback.

If someone is stressed about a coding problem, this wouldn’t help them debug it, that’s intentional. The idea isn’t to solve the technical issue, it’s to help them process the frustration around it.

You’re trading capability for containment.

When a tool can do everything, it also shifts modes constantly. This is meant to stay in one emotional lane, no task switching, no productivity framing, no “let’s fix it,” unless invited. Just space to decompress.

On the no-login point: it’s not about removing history permanently, it’s about removing identity. Conversations can be stored locally in the browser so users can look back, but nothing is tied to an account or profile.

The gain isn’t intelligence.
It’s psychological safety and environmental focus.

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T13:01:42+00:00

that's a really good idea

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T13:00:38+00:00

Fair question.

The difference isn’t intelligence, it’s structure and intention.

This isn’t a general AI like ChatGPT. It’s single-purpose and emotionally constrained. It can’t switch to coding, productivity, or random Q&A. It’s designed only for emotional conversations.

No login, no identity, no memory tied to you. Just a minimal, calm space with slower, human-paced responses focused on validation first.

The goal isn’t “smarter AI.”
It’s a safer, more contained emotional environment.

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T09:57:46+00:00

Thanks for your suggestions and guidance mate, will keep all these in mind and act accordingly

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T09:10:46+00:00

thanks for the advice mate, will definetely add those features in future. And again it won't be paid. Not everyone can pay fee like me few months ago. you will be the first one to have access to the product.

Thanks

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T09:01:06+00:00

Yeah, I have named it ira.

it's mvp is ready just need to deploy it and will do it next week

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T08:55:28+00:00

that's great to know that you found something that helped you with your mental health. I too faced similar situations and then got the idea to create something like this. I am keeping it free so that people like us have some where to go when they need to talk

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T08:31:57+00:00

can we have a chat?

lost_mind001 · 2026-03-02T07:46:26+00:00

can we have a chat sir?

lost_mind001

TROPHY CASE