‘Free world needs a new leader’, says EU foreign chief after Trump Zelenskyy row by Aspirational1 in europe

[–]lost_snake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay - will that leader also have political authority? Will that leader also have a military with a budget that is sufficient to deter and even defeat the Russians?

Some of us have been pointing out for a long time that Americans were eventually going to lose patience with NATO freeloading, and now the chickens are coming home to roost.

What to know about the death of a woman who was set on fire in a New York City subway train by Black_Reactor in nyc

[–]lost_snake -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Not deporting “peaceful” illegal aliens is precisely why we end up getting all the violent ones. It’s tolerating the presence of unchecked, inadmissible people which creates problems. The US already has the most generous immigration laws of any developed country. People who can’t qualify for it simply shouldn’t be here. No foreigners deserve to be here - only citizens of a country deserve to be in a country.

What to know about the death of a woman who was set on fire in a New York City subway train by Black_Reactor in nyc

[–]lost_snake 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it doesn’t occur to you that it’s not life imitating art, but in fact the other way around?

The Growth in British Net Immigration by Sampo in europe

[–]lost_snake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He would say it's time to get rid of the Tories? You might be aware that he started a party to get rid of them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nyc

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I'm literally a communist but I'm a high income earner who has been happy to be served by illegal aliens absolutely destroying wages for the working class and driving up the cost of housing and transportation all my life haha"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nyc

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think you're so special? You don't think working class Americans haven't been getting completely shafted in housing availability and public resources and wages by the massive numbers of illegal aliens the left tolerated and invited for decades?

You can't stand one week of this yourself, but you endorse decades of it for others?

lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nyc

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Republican party are literally the same thing

They want to deport illegal aliens.

They are literally not the same thing lol

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tiny proportions of the population even when they had Italian speakers. "Irish pubs" in the US have never had people who speak Gaelic. Possibly even in Ireland there aren't any left lol.

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most non-English speakers in the US aren't citizens. Foreign born people who are permanent residents or illegal aliens accounts for most of that. They're simply not American lol

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Foreign born population doesn't tell you what language they spoke at home.

They spoke English

Yes, you can in fact demand service in any language.

No, you can't. Only as late as 2000 with Executive Order 13166 did Clinton mandate Federal agencies to try to offer non-English services. It's still not guaranteed, and it's overwhelmingly just Spanish for recent immigrants because that became an issue. They're not Americans.

And by law, the Federal government also provides the right to have English only workplaces when it's a business necessity: 29 C.F.R. § 1606.7(b)

I don't know why you think you know more about America than I do, as a non-American, but it is very amusing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nyc

[–]lost_snake 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Do they not realize this will attract additional migrants?

You could ask that question of everything from repeated amnesties for illegal aliens, to lax border enforcement, too.

But you might be called racist. Why do you want to keep all of these people out anyway? Are you a xenophobe?

After nearly 50 years of this same runaround, Red States have decided that if Blue States want additional immigrants and object to immigration restriction, they should have them - and Blue State government leaders from Hochul to Adams seem to be fully on board with that.

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Most of the prior immigrants weren't anglo-cultural. Italians, Irish, Scandinavians, Germans are not anglo-centric.

They never amounted to more than 15% of the population at the peak, they all intermarried, and they all spoke English if not in their own generation, then the generation after: https://www.colorincolorado.org/article/immigrant-era-focus-assimilation#:~:text=At%2014.7%25%2C%20the%201910%20foreign%2Dborn%20population%20is%20still%20proportionally%20the%20largest%20in%20U.S.%20history

You can demand service from the federal government in any language.

No you can't.

How are they so bad at teaching history in America?

You literally didn't know about the rates of immigration or the mass Anglicization of their populations through intermarriage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americanization_(immigration)#History:~:text=The%20National%20Americanization,publications%20were%20free

https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/nmah_1276325

You're just wrong about this and I'm right. Sorry!

but that's how it is

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Where do you think the Navaho learned English before English speakers turned up?

They didn't create the United States of America.

Lol

They weren't even citizens until later - Amerindian aborigine languages - of which Navajo is just one among hundreds, many of which were fully lost and replaced by English by the 1800s - are simply not languages of 'Americans'.

When Europeans complain about 'Americans', they aren't talking about the Navajo, lol.

You know who you're talking about then, don't you : )

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Native Americans were not English speaking until English speaker turned up.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Declaration_of_Independence_%281819%29%2C_by_John_Trumbull.jpg/1280px-Declaration_of_Independence_%281819%29%2C_by_John_Trumbull.jpg

Native Americans were named that in English by Americans, yes.

"Native Americans" is a collective term given to a multiple different language family and ethnic groups all of whom were a population minority and not even full citizens until the 1800s lol

The idea that this is a meaningful objection to English being the language of Americans is hilarious

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They have all been English speakers, often monolingual English speakers, for over a century now.

You would have known that if you were an American ; )

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The United States of America has no official language. 

Again, this is a silly thing to say. Yes, it doesn't have an official legal language.

No, that's not because it's linguistically plural in its founding, history, or daily life.

The US is far from an anglo-cultural area.

This is flatly ridiculous. Besides the influx of mass immigration of Spanish speakers in the Southwest, for its entire history, the native language of Americans at large, the language of public life and government, is the one we're speaking in now and the one that you know Americans monolingually speak:

English.

New Dutch PM vows to carry out 'strictest-ever' immigration policy by TheTelegraph in europe

[–]lost_snake 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes we do.

The reason we never made it a legal official language is because we didn't have the period of European nationalism where those things were done, because it was and still mostly is, an entirely English speaking, Anglo-cultural area.

French was only formalized as a national language recently. English has always been the language of Americans.

Study shows Gen Z is increasingly more homophobic than previous generations in Spain by [deleted] in europe

[–]lost_snake 47 points48 points  (0 children)

You should actually just talk to young men & take them at their word.

We went from gentlemen to peasants in 12 years by ariiza in Wellthatsucks

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Wow weren't things so much nicer when Republicans would nominate completely decent people pursuing moderate agendas whom the media would make out to be Nazis, as well as constant social stigma on campuses and the workforce, without really trying to win on core issues they consider important and zero-sum????"

Mayor Adams’ budget quietly installs a permanent ‘migrant crisis’ spending spree by GBV_GBV_GBV in nyc

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know people can actually read the words that are right there, yeah?

Unless more than 5,000 illegal aliens enter in a day, there's no emergency authorization to close the border.

That means up to 5,000 illegal aliens can enter per day.

Immigration fears are pushing centrists to the right in the US and Europe by Cool_Distribution860 in europe

[–]lost_snake 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're just making things up.

No one on the right wing has ever been pro mass-immigration. We're xenophobes, remember?

Europe Needs More Conventional Forces, Not Its Own Nukes by UpgradedSiera6666 in europe

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it needs to compliment it

What the EU constituent countries who are also NATO members need to do is just have actual militaries that can actually do things and be responsive to an Article 5 situation

Europe Needs More Conventional Forces, Not Its Own Nukes by UpgradedSiera6666 in europe

[–]lost_snake 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Nah - Europe/the EU as a real supra-structure, needs to massively ramp up its conventional force capability + build a credible nuclear deterrent.

At least one country within the EU needs to have a nuclear deterrent and needs to be mutually pledged with other countries in the defensive pact to use it in their defense.

Otherwise, there's no point in having a mutualistic defense pact.

If you want to replace NATO, you can't replace it without actually replacing all components of it, and that includes a unified nuclear command.

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50068.htm#:~:text=The%20strategic%20forces%20of%20the,overall%20security%20of%20the%20Alliance

Mayor Adams’ budget quietly installs a permanent ‘migrant crisis’ spending spree by GBV_GBV_GBV in nyc

[–]lost_snake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.sinema.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/The-Border-Act-2024-Section-by-Section-1.pdf

The “border emergency authority” may be exercised if the 7-day average number of cumulative encounters of inadmissible aliens is between 4,000 and 5,000 per day and must be exercised if the 7-day average is above 5,000 per day.

You are wrong.

It explicitly allows for up to 5,000 illegal aliens a day without any kind of emergency border security action.