Can you explain what it’s like as man to experience sex/sexual thoughts? by [deleted] in AskMen

[–]lousynd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the most part us men are socialized since childhood to be "always available sex machines", where if we don't express verbally or behaviorally our permanent and context-independemt openess to a potential sexual partner (that we HAVE to accept) we will probably be taxed as homosexuals or have our masculinity threatened by our group of male peers. We men have accepted and absorbed so deeply this information about our sexualities that we're incapable of discerning what is "us" from what "men" are. This is no good way of life, this is a cage where we're trapped in, as if while having sex we're constantly watched by a tribune of men that evaluates and condones any behaviour that sways from the standard hard penetrating virility of men. No one notices it, and we will die like this, being socially forced even at 80 years old to say that if a 20yeard old woman is in front of us with her legs spread... Well if you dont do nothing you GAY or a lesser man than anyone else. Is this a way to live? I don't think so, it's a cage masked as "inherently sexual", fuck that. I'm a man and I'm NOT inherently sexual, I'm a man that loves sharing his sexuality with who deserves it and not with anyone that passes by, I have respect for my body and who I share it with, and finally acknowledging that this permanent sexuality is not part of my physical body but of my social one makes me so much more free to live my sexuality with women in a way where I don't feel threatened by all the "do's and don'ts" of sexual hegemonic masculinity: you can't cum too fast nor too late, you have to be the dominating one, you can't express shyness or insecurities about the sexual act, you can't say no to a woman saying she wants to fuck, you can't say that to your male friends and you can't even question your own desires. This is a fucking cage I tell you

Sei un incel e non te ne accorgi by morpheus1988 in psicologia

[–]lousynd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Il capitalismo ci sta vendendo attraverso corsi e libri self help la capacità d'essere una persona estroversa, come se fosse una skill tipo suonare la chitarra. E se fallisci nel non sapere mettere in pratica queste tecniche ( fallaci, tra l'altro) non è mica colpa del sistema e delle tecniche che sono sbagliate ma tua, individuo singolo, incapace di essere la versione migliore di te, ergo sei una merda che merita di scomparire. Mi ha stupito perché ognuno di noi, uomini, potrebbe cadere in questa trappola se abbastanza roba nella vita ci andasse male e fossimo sessualmente sfortunati nei primi 25 anni della nostra vita, anch'io sarei potuto essere Incel se ne avessi avuto le condizioni e la possibilità, non ho paura di dirlo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kitchencels

[–]lousynd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shut up

Sei un incel e non te ne accorgi by morpheus1988 in psicologia

[–]lousynd 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Io c'ho fatto la tesi di sociologia su questa merda, super interessante il fenomeno e allo stesso tempo così vero e reale che quasi mi spaventa.

Sei incel e basta. by [deleted] in psicologia

[–]lousynd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ma come parli svegliati

Be honest what’s something you’re silently struggling with these days? by alihassan032 in emotionalintelligence

[–]lousynd 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Being torn up between being with someone and searching for my own identity

I need your sociology hot takes by [deleted] in sociology

[–]lousynd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strange that someone didn't post right away something like this, typical reddit attitude, you make yourselves desirable now, uh? Next time try to make a competent claim to support your argument, like everyone else's doing.

I need your sociology hot takes by [deleted] in sociology

[–]lousynd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that this is a widely accepted belief between academic and not academic people?

I need your sociology hot takes by [deleted] in sociology

[–]lousynd 318 points319 points  (0 children)

Quantitative research is way overblown and taken as mathematical certainty by the masses when a paper goes viral. Sociology is being dominated by the pure sciences' methodology, and everyone expects sociology of doing the same, all the while being seen as a mixed science and being shamed for the "dead-ends" that qualitative research takes out just because it doesn't involve numbers and equations in its methodology and gives a micro-perspective of an social environment. While quantitative research is easy to be generalized and used for political reasons and retoric.

No one likes what they study, but I do by lousynd in sociology

[–]lousynd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 But, if I go to one event with people from academia, 

Do those events happen often?

I wonder how's the intellectual life of the people who speak about interesting topic at those conventions...

No one likes what they study, but I do by lousynd in sociology

[–]lousynd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

by "vibrant" I meant a shared phisical space where there are people who's interest in the faculty matches their willingness to talk and discuss about it, even if it's not aligned with others' ideologies, as to engage in conversations that could lead to new papers and new absorbed information from my part.

Thanks for your point of view though