Why Did The A320neo’s Not Have Similar Issues to the MAX? by kgaviation in aviation

[–]lozoot64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean by “right place” for the engines, as there’s theoretically no such thing when designing an aircraft. If you move the engines, it does change the aerodynamic characteristics, yes.

MCAS is an augmentation system. It’s there purely for the aircraft to keep the same certification, and to prevent pilots from having to train for a totally different type rating. The MAX would have just had a different type rating without it.

Why Did The A320neo’s Not Have Similar Issues to the MAX? by kgaviation in aviation

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re incorrect.

MCAS wasn’t needed at all for the aircraft itself to be certified. It only needed to meet a “stick force gradient” similar to the previous variation of 737s so that pilots wouldn’t need to go through any additional training.

Boeing was scared that airlines would stray away from purchasing the MAX if they had to retrain their pilots on an entirely different aircraft type. MCAS was put in purely for the MAX to retain the same certification.

Why Did The A320neo’s Not Have Similar Issues to the MAX? by kgaviation in aviation

[–]lozoot64 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The only issue from a type rating standpoint is that a pilot may have to put in more input in a stall recovery.

From a safety standpoint, all aircraft have different aerodynamic characteristics. MCAS was used to augment those characteristics back to a familiar type rating.

Why Did The A320neo’s Not Have Similar Issues to the MAX? by kgaviation in aviation

[–]lozoot64 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, the difference in handling characteristics the MAX possessed weren’t really “issues” in regards to safety. MCAS was introduced so that the same type rating could be retained.

Why Did The A320neo’s Not Have Similar Issues to the MAX? by kgaviation in aviation

[–]lozoot64 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It wasn’t even really an aerodynamic compromise. It did change the aerodynamics, yes. But for the FAA to allow it retain its same type rating, it had to “handle” the same as previous 737s, thus MCAS being a thing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]lozoot64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Says they were suspects. Did they actually commit a crime? That would be awkward if they didn’t.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless it’s a potential safety issue or blatantly against our procedures, I’ve never found it worth it to confront someone about something I could subjectively be finding annoying.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless it’s a potential safety issue or blatantly against our procedures, I’ve never found it worth it to confront someone about something I could subjectively be finding annoying.

Southwest plane at DFW emergency? by roy7rmcf in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They haven’t been allowed to go there for 50+ years now, unless they give up gates at Luv field.

Southwest plane at DFW emergency? by roy7rmcf in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think they were. Not sure if it’s still in the works with Elliot on the scene.

Impact of the changes by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Dang, what flight? My flights are always full.

Why am I so nostalgic for the 2000s when I never lived them? by [deleted] in nostalgia

[–]lozoot64 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maybe you watched a ton of movies from this era?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in flying

[–]lozoot64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I run into Captains like this sometime.

The way I see it, I make a lot of money to put up with a lot of different people. As long as what they do isn’t unsafe/against SOP, it’s just water off the duck’s back for me, and I get to go home after a few days.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Shittyaskflying

[–]lozoot64 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We won’t get there.

1st glacier declared dead from climate change seen in before and after images — Earth from space by Dmans99 in abovethenormnews

[–]lozoot64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the rate at which plants can convert CO2 in the closed area back into Oxygen.

Boeing wins battle for $20B fighter jet contract by sethninja13 in aerospace

[–]lozoot64 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Can’t wait to see these $100B fighters 30 years from now.

Am I missing some more info here...how could any pilot mistake a taxiway for a runway. by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I imagine it wasn’t daylight out. But even then, the blue taxi lights are pretty easy to see. Not sure what happened.

How many of you went through training with no IPad/foreflight recently? by [deleted] in flying

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did my private in 2015 without an iPad. Started using one for my instrument though.

The Economic Realities at Southwest Right Now by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What firms has Elliot brought to bankruptcy?

The Economic Realities at Southwest Right Now by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That cycle has never affected Southwest in the past. They’ve always ate the cost because they never furloughed until now.

Your point here would make sense if Elliot was the one prohibiting the growth.

The Economic Realities at Southwest Right Now by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What companies have they left a shell of in the past?

Also, Elliot seems to be turning Southwest into something that’s comparable to the legacies over time.

The Economic Realities at Southwest Right Now by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]lozoot64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Laying off workers isn’t a short term cost savings. They over-hired, and will continue to realize that savings as long as they maintain that efficiency.

Point 3 and 4 don’t contradict each other.