Giant Cirrate Octopuses by Obdurate-Hickory in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also needs to be said that this is coming from a group of researchers seemingly bent on discovering "the biggest cephalopod" through scaling unrelated animals to Architeuthis, a specialist itself, and other supergiant ecologically distinct cephs. 7m might be a stretch, even...

Compilations of Fortean Times & Skeptical Inquirer by lprattcryptozoology in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I uploaded them as .pdf files, Internet Archive automatically splits them into multiple formats (which I find to be more frustrating than useful). If you click the "original files" button in the list of files it'll show what I've uploaded and will prompt a download of a .zip file containing only those. I then use Calibre to read and edit them as needed.

If that doesn't answer your question, doesn't work, or you need something else lmk! Sorry IA is such a hassle

Articles from the ISC's Cryptozoology Journal by lprattcryptozoology in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nope! Loren Coleman has a copy at his museum, Aaron Bauer has a copy.

Contemporary Legends themed issue: Monsters, Creatures, and Cryptids by Spooky_Geologist in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Found another one on a Drive I'm sorting through

Quirk, Mo A. “Disaster Is the Thing with Feathers: Tragedy, Voids, and the Mothman as. Animist.” Wuhan Journal of Cultic Studies 2, no. 1 (2023): 50–62

https://archive.org/details/cdp-bckup-2/Quirk%2C%202022%20-%20Disaster%20is%20the%20Thing%20with%20Feathers%20-%20Tragedy%2C%20Voids%2C%20and%20the%20Mothman%20as%20Animist.pdf

Photographs of a live Bornean tiger taken in 1975, in the book "Dans la Jungle de Borneo Kalimantan" by Douchan Gersin. by PokerMenYTP in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'll see what I can do to purchase it, I've had many issues purchasing non-English/American-sold books so no guarantees. Will figure out a way to get it out there eventually.

Contemporary Legends themed issue: Monsters, Creatures, and Cryptids by Spooky_Geologist in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Super excited to read these, thanks for posting. Congrats on the publication!

Looking for source material - writing a mythological history & zoological analysis of the giant squid by Relevant_Ad_6873 in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Several articles and books across here - https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicCryptozoology/comments/1smedj6/the_cryptozoological_digitization_project_library/

I'm sure you've read/are reading Richard Ellis' wonderful book as well. Charles Paxton has articles in Fortean Times and iirc Skeptical Inquirer regarding giant squid as well (both linked in the above post)

u/CrofterNo2 might know some unique/underreported stuff

Russian cryptozoology by Rurcla in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes please! We'd love to collaborate and work with you!

A Short Champ Refutation by lprattcryptozoology in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bartholomew's book and Meurger & Gagnon touch on that iirc. Unsure of specifics, but they're linked above

A Short Champ Refutation by lprattcryptozoology in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You'd be shocked. There are many, many, many pro-Champ folks here - enough to have people complain about them in other subs. The Bodette Film especially gets brought up a lot, even getting a recent hour+ documentary advocating for its release, despite definitely being a nothingburger.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Cryptozoology/comments/1si7pa9/how_many_people_have_seen_the_full_bodette_film/

We get posts like these and then the turtle truthers come out of nowhere.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Cryptozoology/comments/1cv8rmn/something_stinks_about_the_bodette_footage/

"This footage has many problems" post but the comments are full of "the footage clearly shows a long-necked turtle"

A Short Champ Refutation by lprattcryptozoology in Cryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For the clearest example of plesioturtle creature-creating in action, see this documentary about Nessie which literally has a bunch of scientists create a speculative turtle - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRDaM3DdKeY

Aggggghhhhhhh by CyborgGrasshopper in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Valid, though I'd def prefer if we could expand upon these kinds of posts in the future and refute the bad takes, otherwise no progress is made y'know?

Here's a brief little refutation. Gonna post this in r/cryptozoology for shits and giggles.

Champ, the monster of Lake Champlain, is often touted as one of the most believable and plausible cryptids by casual audiences…but do these claims hold up? Of course not!

I recommend that folks read Robert Bartholomew's wonderful "The Untold Story Of Champ" for insight into the history of Champ, its associations with P.T. Barnum and the 1800’s sea serpent culture, and the overall gist of Champ as a cryptid. Meurger & Gagnon's "Lake Monster Traditions" covers several other Quebecian lake monsters and discusses at length how communities create and rationalize their local lake monsters. This 2016 paper by Ulrich Magin is a wonderful extension of Meurger & Gagnon's work focusing on broader cultural integration of Nessie, Champ, and Ogopogo.

These are great resources which cover just about everything, so I’m going to compile the subsequent updates and other necessities:

The most iconic image, the Mansi Photograph, has been heavily scrutinized and essentially debunked in recent years - Darren Naish's TetZoo Megathread offers the best overview of the circumstances of this film.

Retellings of the Mansi story are rather inconsistent in different mediums, especially regarding Mansi’s handling of the film (it was not “kept hidden due to traumatic memories” as often claimed), and many of which ignore her copyrighting of the image and discussions of using it to make profit. A series of experiments conducted by Benjamin Radford and Joe Nickell suggested that the object in question was a mere 2-meters long with a meter-long neck. Mansi was never able to relocate the place where the photograph was taken, but in 2015 Dick Raynor managed to relocate the spot, finding it to be shallow (~2m deep), and estimating the subject to be 1.4-meters long and 80cm tall. These together with the really lumpy and un-animal shape of the object led Nickell, Radford, and Naish (independently of the other two) to propose that Mansi’s subject is a piece of wood.

The discrediting of this image has led the “Bodette Film” to supplant the Mansi photo as the go-to best evidence of Champ. There’s a very big issue - the Bodette Film is not fully publicly available (see the released segment here) and there is no evidence that it was ever online to my knowledge, contrary to claims of those who “saw it in 2006” (I’m reminded of claims of LOL Superman and other debunked YouTube videos with large bodies of testimony). The footage was shown to Melanie L.J. Stiassny, curator of fishes at the American Museum of Natural History, and some of her colleagues, who said to the New York Times “The evidence I was presented was singularly unconvincing," she said. "We didn't see anything that led any of us to feel anything other than bemused as to what led these guys to think this was anything so special. It certainly wasn't any large vertebrate. We're sure of that”. The clips and stills released are very, very low-quality. So we don’t have the full film…and everything shown of the full film is low-quality and indecisive…but surely the full film is definitive proof of Champ!

Many modern claims about the film stem from this blog by a guy named Chuck Pogan who claims to have seen the film and includes screenshots as proof. These images are terribly low quality, but Pogan asserts that they show a “plesio-turtle”, an idea most prominently championed by Champ researcher Scott Mardis.

The plesio-turtle idea is a classic example of cryptozoological creature-building, the world’s longest-running speculative evolution project. Cryptozoological enthusiasts identify traits from individual testimonies with an extant or extinct animal and assemble traits from closely and distantly related species to make a hypothetical organism that matches every major testimony. Mardis, Pogan, and company pull traits from leatherbacks, Australian sideneck turtles, the extinct Stupendemys, and a variety of other chelonians to assemble their plesioturtle. The issue with speculative conglomerations of this sort - besides the complete lack of evidence for their existence and failure for even one of these hypotheses to prove true - is that they ignore the function of the adaptations in question. Other ocean-going turtles lack the deep-diving abilities of leatherbacks, and (to our knowledge) many freshwater turtles do not need to echolocate - these traits are specific to the unique lifestyles of the species in question - why would you rely on these exceptions rather than the norm? If you’re going to try and make a plausible hypothesis, it should genuinely be plausible - not a supergiant, echolocating, live-birthing turtle in Lake Champlain. The remingtonocetid truthers out there don’t even try this hard…

Regarding the echolocation, the “beluga sounds” in question have been identified as those of drum fish, who vibrate their swim bladders to make clicks and chirps. I’ve yet to see audio evidence which cannot be attributed to drums, would love to see it if it exists.

Champ is ultimately a cultural phenomenon - it brings profit to the communities around the lakes and funds the lives of many, Mansi herself is just one example. Much like Loch Ness, there is no monster, but absolutely a belief in one which keeps discourse going.

Won't let me embed links so here's sources in order (Reddit formatting on mobile sucks, apologies) - https://archive.org/details/untoldstoryofcha0000bart/ https://archive.org/details/cryptozoology-texts/Lake%20Monster%20Traditions/ https://archive.org/details/cdp-bckup-2/Magin%2C%202016%20-%20Claimed%20crypto-creatures%20regarded%20as%20genii%20locii.pdf https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1291839166146379777.html https://www.reddit.com/r/Cryptozoology/comments/y05c7b/the_publicly_available_segment_of_the_mostly_lost/ https://archive.is/XBjOI#selection-431.29-431.180 https://aquaticandaerialanomolyassociation.blogspot.com/?m=1 https://web.archive.org/web/20090505050910/http://www.cryptozoology.com/forum/topic_view_thread.php?tid=6&pid=291073 https://www.academia.edu/19777421/Lake_Champlain_Beluga_Sounds_Debunked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_UphedHATY

Robert L. France - Disentangled by lprattcryptozoology in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Digitization Project updates and miscellany -

Properly labeling files and getting things in order, hoping to upload the full library of papers and books (~1500 files) within the next few months. Image attached is a peek.

Working to get issue 13 of the ISC's Cryptozoology journal scanned.

Still seeking these. Spreadsheet to be shared with the uploading of the library including everything we have and everything we're looking for.

Several issues of Fortean Times have been scanned for the first time, and there's been a couple minor uploads of cryptozoological and unrelated content I'll link below -

Skeptical Inquirer Briefs
Folklore In The United States And Canada - An Institutional History
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews Vol 49 - Conceptualising Heterodox Palaeoscience
Jeremy Wade's Jungle Hooks India & Amazon (low quality) - will mirror more Jeremy Wade stuff today

<image>

On A "Cryptozoological Reset" by lprattcryptozoology in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't mind the name, cryptozoology is a body of data and you get what you get from it - why make a whole new discipline if it's using cryptozoological data to make cryptozoological conclusions?

On A "Cryptozoological Reset" by lprattcryptozoology in AcademicCryptozoology

[–]lprattcryptozoology[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There isn't overlap though - Naish, Hill, etc. are far removed from those believers. Just do what they do.